Knowledge, views, practice and self-efficacy regarding copper intrauterine contraceptive device usage among public primary care doctors in Sarawak: A cross-sectional study.

Q3 Nursing
Malaysian Family Physician Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.51866/oa.662
Yik Huang Chua, Chare Chee Kueh, Sing Seng Lee, Li Lian Lim, Kii Han Sia, Hie Ping Sii, Ishak Maziah, Chandramani Thuraisingham, Cheong Lieng Teng
{"title":"Knowledge, views, practice and self-efficacy regarding copper intrauterine contraceptive device usage among public primary care doctors in Sarawak: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yik Huang Chua, Chare Chee Kueh, Sing Seng Lee, Li Lian Lim, Kii Han Sia, Hie Ping Sii, Ishak Maziah, Chandramani Thuraisingham, Cheong Lieng Teng","doi":"10.51866/oa.662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) insertion is a reversible and effective way to reduce unplanned pregnancy. Doctors play a key role in IUCD usage. This study aimed to assess knowledge, views, practice and self-efficacy regarding copper IUCD usage among public primary care doctors in Sarawak.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in all public primary care clinics in Sarawak. A selfadministered online survey form was distributed to doctors in the eligible clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 312 doctors participated in the survey. Most of them (81.4%) worked in a clinic where IUCDs were available. The median knowledge score among the medical officers was 15 (maximum score: 20). The knowledge score was correlated with the length of primary care experience and was higher among the doctors who had prior IUCD training and ever had inserted IUCDs. The doctors were concerned about the side effects of IUCDs, especially perforation and pelvic inflammatory diseases, and were negatively influenced by the additional counselling time required when recommending IUCDs. They recognised IUCD usage as a long-term and reversible contraception method. Most (69.2%) doctors had inserted IUCDs before, but only 45.9% had inserted five or more IUCDs. The self-efficacy of the doctors regarding IUCD insertion was moderate (63% of the total score).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The knowledge and self-efficacy of the public primary care doctors in Sarawak were moderate. Although IUCDs were widely available, the number of IUCD insertions was relatively small. Further research is warranted to quantify IUCD usage and identify its barriers among nurses and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":40017,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Family Physician","volume":"20 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Family Physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51866/oa.662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) insertion is a reversible and effective way to reduce unplanned pregnancy. Doctors play a key role in IUCD usage. This study aimed to assess knowledge, views, practice and self-efficacy regarding copper IUCD usage among public primary care doctors in Sarawak.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in all public primary care clinics in Sarawak. A selfadministered online survey form was distributed to doctors in the eligible clinics.

Results: A total of 312 doctors participated in the survey. Most of them (81.4%) worked in a clinic where IUCDs were available. The median knowledge score among the medical officers was 15 (maximum score: 20). The knowledge score was correlated with the length of primary care experience and was higher among the doctors who had prior IUCD training and ever had inserted IUCDs. The doctors were concerned about the side effects of IUCDs, especially perforation and pelvic inflammatory diseases, and were negatively influenced by the additional counselling time required when recommending IUCDs. They recognised IUCD usage as a long-term and reversible contraception method. Most (69.2%) doctors had inserted IUCDs before, but only 45.9% had inserted five or more IUCDs. The self-efficacy of the doctors regarding IUCD insertion was moderate (63% of the total score).

Conclusion: The knowledge and self-efficacy of the public primary care doctors in Sarawak were moderate. Although IUCDs were widely available, the number of IUCD insertions was relatively small. Further research is warranted to quantify IUCD usage and identify its barriers among nurses and patients.

砂拉越公立初级保健医生关于铜宫内节育器使用的知识、观点、实践和自我效能:一项横断面研究。
导读:宫内节育器植入术是减少意外妊娠的一种可逆、有效的方法。医生在宫内节育器的使用中起着关键作用。本研究旨在评估砂拉越公立初级保健医生对铜宫内节育器使用的知识、观点、实践和自我效能感。方法:在沙捞越所有公立初级保健诊所进行横断面研究。向符合条件的诊所的医生分发了一份自行填写的在线调查表格。结果:共有312名医生参与调查。其中大多数(81.4%)在提供宫内节育器的诊所工作。医务人员知识得分中位数为15分,满分为20分。知识得分与初级保健经验的长度相关,并且在接受过IUCD培训和曾经植入过IUCD的医生中得分更高。医生担心宫内节育器的副作用,特别是穿孔和盆腔炎,并且在推荐宫内节育器时需要额外的咨询时间,这对医生产生了负面影响。他们认为宫内节育器的使用是一种长期可逆的避孕方法。大多数(69.2%)医生以前植入过宫内节育器,但只有45.9%的医生植入过5个或更多宫内节育器。医生对宫内节育器置入的自我效能感为中等(占总分的63%)。结论:沙捞越州公立初级保健医生的知识水平和自我效能感处于中等水平。虽然宫内节育器广泛使用,但植入宫内节育器的数量相对较少。进一步的研究需要量化宫内节育器的使用,并确定护士和患者之间的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaysian Family Physician
Malaysian Family Physician Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Family Physician is the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia. It is published three times a year. Circulation: The journal is distributed free of charge to all members of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia. Complimentary copies are also sent to other organizations that are members of the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信