Current status of Asian joint registries: a review.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ben C P Shum, Lawrence C M Lau, Jason P Y Cheung, Siu-Wai Choi
{"title":"Current status of Asian joint registries: a review.","authors":"Ben C P Shum, Lawrence C M Lau, Jason P Y Cheung, Siu-Wai Choi","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2024-0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A comprehensive overview of current Asian joint arthroplasty registries, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses and providing a case for establishing registries nationwide, is given. Pertinent information required for the future establishment and improvement of Asian joint arthroplasty registries is given. Six registries in Asia were identified, with three, Indian Joint Registry, Japanese Orthopaedic Association National Registry and Pakistan National Joint Registry having developed official websites and published annual reports. The majority of both hip and knee surgeries in India and Pakistan were carried out on men, in contrary to Japan, where the majority of knee surgeries were conducted in women. Osteoarthritis was the primary indication for knee surgery, whereas osteonecrosis was the main indication for hip surgery in India and Pakistan, compared to osteoarthritis in Japan. Many countries in Asia have attempted to report data on joint arthroplasties, though little information on nationwide registries is available, with three countries - Japan, India and Pakistan - having made their joint registry data available to the public.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"10 5","pages":"250-257"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2024-0085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comprehensive overview of current Asian joint arthroplasty registries, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses and providing a case for establishing registries nationwide, is given. Pertinent information required for the future establishment and improvement of Asian joint arthroplasty registries is given. Six registries in Asia were identified, with three, Indian Joint Registry, Japanese Orthopaedic Association National Registry and Pakistan National Joint Registry having developed official websites and published annual reports. The majority of both hip and knee surgeries in India and Pakistan were carried out on men, in contrary to Japan, where the majority of knee surgeries were conducted in women. Osteoarthritis was the primary indication for knee surgery, whereas osteonecrosis was the main indication for hip surgery in India and Pakistan, compared to osteoarthritis in Japan. Many countries in Asia have attempted to report data on joint arthroplasties, though little information on nationwide registries is available, with three countries - Japan, India and Pakistan - having made their joint registry data available to the public.

亚洲联合登记的现状:综述。
全面概述当前亚洲关节置换术登记,突出其优势和劣势,并提供了一个建立全国登记的案例,给出。给出了未来建立和改进亚洲关节成形术登记所需的相关信息。确定了亚洲的六个注册中心,其中三个是印度联合注册中心、日本骨科协会国家注册中心和巴基斯坦国家联合注册中心,它们开发了官方网站并发布了年度报告。在印度和巴基斯坦,大多数髋关节和膝关节手术都是在男性身上进行的,而在日本,大多数膝关节手术都是在女性身上进行的。骨关节炎是膝关节手术的主要适应症,而在印度和巴基斯坦,骨坏死是髋关节手术的主要适应症,而在日本,骨关节炎是主要适应症。亚洲许多国家都试图报告关节置换手术的数据,尽管关于全国登记的信息很少,只有三个国家- -日本、印度和巴基斯坦- -向公众提供了它们的联合登记数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信