Therapeutic Potential and Translational Challenges for Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Nicholas H Pirolli, Jean-Pierre Raufman, Steven M Jay
{"title":"Therapeutic Potential and Translational Challenges for Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Nicholas H Pirolli, Jean-Pierre Raufman, Steven M Jay","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izaf107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the availability of numerous new immune-directed therapeutics, the major constituents of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD)-continue to afflict millions worldwide, resulting in significant morbidity and long-term health risks. IBD results from a triad of immune, environmental (eg, gut microbiome), and genetic (including epigenetic) mechanisms, and therefore has been subject to a wide variety of therapeutic strategies. Among these, the administration of probiotics, particularly Gram-positive lactic acid bacteria (LAB), targeting both immune and environmental factors, has shown promising potential for efficacy in selected populations in early clinical trials. However, knowledge gaps and inconsistent efficacy currently prevent recommendations for the use of probiotics in larger IBD patient populations. The inconsistent efficacy of probiotics is likely due to variable cell viability and potency after administration, further exacerbated by IBD patient heterogeneity. Thus, an alternative to live probiotics for IBD has emerged in the form of bacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs)-cell-secreted nanovesicles containing abundant bioactive cargo that, like live probiotics, can regulate immune and environmental factors but with fewer viability limitations and safety concerns. In this review, we summarize the work done to date establishing the potential of BEVs to provide the therapeutic benefits in IBD and discuss the hurdles BEVs must overcome to achieve clinical translation. We also consider future directions for BEV therapeutics, especially treatment potential for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), which shares similarities in pathophysiology with IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaf107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the availability of numerous new immune-directed therapeutics, the major constituents of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD)-continue to afflict millions worldwide, resulting in significant morbidity and long-term health risks. IBD results from a triad of immune, environmental (eg, gut microbiome), and genetic (including epigenetic) mechanisms, and therefore has been subject to a wide variety of therapeutic strategies. Among these, the administration of probiotics, particularly Gram-positive lactic acid bacteria (LAB), targeting both immune and environmental factors, has shown promising potential for efficacy in selected populations in early clinical trials. However, knowledge gaps and inconsistent efficacy currently prevent recommendations for the use of probiotics in larger IBD patient populations. The inconsistent efficacy of probiotics is likely due to variable cell viability and potency after administration, further exacerbated by IBD patient heterogeneity. Thus, an alternative to live probiotics for IBD has emerged in the form of bacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs)-cell-secreted nanovesicles containing abundant bioactive cargo that, like live probiotics, can regulate immune and environmental factors but with fewer viability limitations and safety concerns. In this review, we summarize the work done to date establishing the potential of BEVs to provide the therapeutic benefits in IBD and discuss the hurdles BEVs must overcome to achieve clinical translation. We also consider future directions for BEV therapeutics, especially treatment potential for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), which shares similarities in pathophysiology with IBD.

细菌性细胞外囊泡在炎症性肠病中的治疗潜力和转化挑战。
尽管有许多新的免疫定向治疗方法,但炎症性肠病(IBD)的主要成分-溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)-继续折磨着全世界数百万人,导致严重的发病率和长期健康风险。IBD是由免疫、环境(如肠道微生物组)和遗传(包括表观遗传)三种机制引起的,因此有多种治疗策略。其中,在早期临床试验中,针对免疫和环境因素给予益生菌,特别是革兰氏阳性乳酸菌(LAB),已在选定人群中显示出良好的疗效潜力。然而,知识差距和不一致的疗效目前阻碍了在更大的IBD患者群体中使用益生菌的建议。益生菌的疗效不一致可能是由于给药后细胞活力和效力不同,IBD患者的异质性进一步加剧了这一点。因此,IBD的活益生菌替代品以细菌细胞外囊泡(BEVs)的形式出现了-细胞分泌的纳米囊泡含有丰富的生物活性货物,像活益生菌一样,可以调节免疫和环境因素,但具有较少的活力限制和安全问题。在这篇综述中,我们总结了迄今为止所做的工作,以确定bev在IBD中提供治疗益处的潜力,并讨论了bev实现临床转化必须克服的障碍。我们还考虑了BEV治疗的未来方向,特别是坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的治疗潜力,这与IBD的病理生理学有相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信