Is there still a place for fast-acting neuromuscular blockade agents: fast onset or safe and prompt reversal?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001497
Radmilo Jankovic, Milena Stojanovic, Aleksandar Nikolic
{"title":"Is there still a place for fast-acting neuromuscular blockade agents: fast onset or safe and prompt reversal?","authors":"Radmilo Jankovic, Milena Stojanovic, Aleksandar Nikolic","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review is timely as it addresses the ongoing challenge of developing an ideal short-acting, nondepolarizing muscle relaxant. It emphasizes the need for agents that combine a rapid onset, brief duration of action, and a favorable safety profile-paralleling succinylcholine's speed while reducing adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent investigations have identified promising compounds such as gantacurium and its analogs (CW002 and CW001), which enable rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade via L-cysteine-mediated chemical antagonism. In addition, novel encapsulation agents such as sugammadex and calabadions have emerged, offering dose-dependent and effective recovery of neuromuscular transmission even at deeper levels of blockade, with minimal hemodynamic impact.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The emerging data suggest that these novel agents could significantly enhance clinical outcomes by improving the precision and safety of neuromuscular blockade management during surgery. Further research is warranted to optimize dosing protocols and verify long-term safety, potentially leading to refined anesthetic practices and better postoperative recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"343-348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review is timely as it addresses the ongoing challenge of developing an ideal short-acting, nondepolarizing muscle relaxant. It emphasizes the need for agents that combine a rapid onset, brief duration of action, and a favorable safety profile-paralleling succinylcholine's speed while reducing adverse effects.

Recent findings: Recent investigations have identified promising compounds such as gantacurium and its analogs (CW002 and CW001), which enable rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade via L-cysteine-mediated chemical antagonism. In addition, novel encapsulation agents such as sugammadex and calabadions have emerged, offering dose-dependent and effective recovery of neuromuscular transmission even at deeper levels of blockade, with minimal hemodynamic impact.

Summary: The emerging data suggest that these novel agents could significantly enhance clinical outcomes by improving the precision and safety of neuromuscular blockade management during surgery. Further research is warranted to optimize dosing protocols and verify long-term safety, potentially leading to refined anesthetic practices and better postoperative recovery.

速效神经肌肉阻滞剂是否仍有一席之地:快速起效还是安全迅速逆转?
综述的目的:这篇综述是及时的,因为它解决了开发理想的短效、非去极化肌肉松弛剂的持续挑战。它强调需要结合起效快、作用持续时间短和良好的安全性的药物-平行于琥珀胆碱的速度,同时减少不良反应。最近的发现:最近的研究已经确定了有前途的化合物,如甘塔库尔及其类似物(CW002和CW001),它们可以通过l -半胱氨酸介导的化学拮抗作用快速逆转神经肌肉阻滞。此外,新型包封剂如sugammadex和calabadions已经出现,即使在较深的阻断水平,也能以最小的血流动力学影响提供剂量依赖性和有效的神经肌肉传递恢复。总结:新出现的数据表明,这些新型药物可以通过提高手术期间神经肌肉阻断管理的准确性和安全性来显著提高临床结果。需要进一步的研究来优化给药方案并验证长期安全性,从而可能导致更精细的麻醉操作和更好的术后恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信