Perinatal Resources and Wildfire Smoke.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002130
Michel Boudreaux, Maranna Yoder, Evan Ellicott, Molly Passarella, Scott A Lorch
{"title":"Perinatal Resources and Wildfire Smoke.","authors":"Michel Boudreaux, Maranna Yoder, Evan Ellicott, Molly Passarella, Scott A Lorch","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnant people and infants are vulnerable to wildfire smoke. However, the availability of perinatal resources in communities impacted by smoke is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe perinatal resources in counties prone to wildfire smoke.</p><p><strong>Research study design: </strong>Smoke data came from the Hazard Mapping System and perinatal resources were gathered from various sources. Choropleth maps described the geographic distribution of smoke. Unadjusted associations and multivariable regressions compared perinatal resource levels by smoke risk. Subgroup analysis of the most rural counties was conducted.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Counties in the contiguous United States (n=3108) during the 2016-2020 period.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Relative smoke risk was defined as the bottom, middle, and top third of the average annual smoke-days distribution. Perinatal resources included driving distance to the nearest maternity care hospital and NICU, the volume and geographic isolation of the nearest maternity care hospital, and county-based measures of OB-GYN and family medicine physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average annual smoke-days ranged from 3.8 (SD=2.0) in low-risk to 15.3 (SD=5.5) in high-risk counties. Compared with low-risk counties, high-risk counties had fewer OB-GYNs per 10,000 births (-32.2, 95% CI: -45.7 to -20.6; P<0.001) and were farther to the nearest maternity hospital (10.1 miles, 95% CI: 8.7-11.5; P<0.001). High-risk counties were also farther to the nearest NICU. Associations were not explained by sociodemographics and were observed in the subset of the most rural counties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Communities prone to wildfire smoke often lack geographic access to the health care resources needed to treat pregnant people and infants in a timely manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 6","pages":"396-404"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pregnant people and infants are vulnerable to wildfire smoke. However, the availability of perinatal resources in communities impacted by smoke is unknown.

Objective: Describe perinatal resources in counties prone to wildfire smoke.

Research study design: Smoke data came from the Hazard Mapping System and perinatal resources were gathered from various sources. Choropleth maps described the geographic distribution of smoke. Unadjusted associations and multivariable regressions compared perinatal resource levels by smoke risk. Subgroup analysis of the most rural counties was conducted.

Subjects: Counties in the contiguous United States (n=3108) during the 2016-2020 period.

Measures: Relative smoke risk was defined as the bottom, middle, and top third of the average annual smoke-days distribution. Perinatal resources included driving distance to the nearest maternity care hospital and NICU, the volume and geographic isolation of the nearest maternity care hospital, and county-based measures of OB-GYN and family medicine physicians.

Results: Average annual smoke-days ranged from 3.8 (SD=2.0) in low-risk to 15.3 (SD=5.5) in high-risk counties. Compared with low-risk counties, high-risk counties had fewer OB-GYNs per 10,000 births (-32.2, 95% CI: -45.7 to -20.6; P<0.001) and were farther to the nearest maternity hospital (10.1 miles, 95% CI: 8.7-11.5; P<0.001). High-risk counties were also farther to the nearest NICU. Associations were not explained by sociodemographics and were observed in the subset of the most rural counties.

Conclusions: Communities prone to wildfire smoke often lack geographic access to the health care resources needed to treat pregnant people and infants in a timely manner.

围产期资源和野火烟雾。
背景:孕妇和婴儿容易受到野火烟雾的伤害。然而,在受烟雾影响的社区,围产期资源的可用性尚不清楚。目的:描述野火烟雾易发县的围产期资源。研究设计:烟雾数据来自危害测绘系统,围产期资源来自各种来源。Choropleth地图描述了烟雾的地理分布。未经调整的关联和多变量回归比较了围产期资源水平与吸烟风险的关系。对大多数农村县进行了亚组分析。研究对象:2016-2020年期间美国相邻县(n=3108)。测量方法:相对吸烟风险定义为年平均吸烟天数分布的底部、中间和前三分之一。围产期资源包括到最近的妇产医院和新生儿重症监护室的驾车距离,最近的妇产医院的数量和地理隔离,以及基于县的妇产科和家庭医学医生的措施。结果:低危县年平均吸烟天数为3.8 (SD=2.0),高危县为15.3 (SD=5.5)。与低风险县相比,高风险县每万名新生儿的妇产科人数较少(-32.2,95% CI: -45.7至-20.6;结论:易受野火烟雾影响的社区往往缺乏及时治疗孕妇和婴儿所需的卫生保健资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信