Maternity providers' moral experiences addressing maternal drug use.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Caroline K Darlington, Peggy Compton, Rebecca Clark, Connie M Ulrich
{"title":"Maternity providers' moral experiences addressing maternal drug use.","authors":"Caroline K Darlington, Peggy Compton, Rebecca Clark, Connie M Ulrich","doi":"10.1177/09697330251333368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAddressing drug use among pregnant and postpartum women is complicated by the social, ethical, and legal interplay between maternal and child needs. The moral experiences of providers as they care for this population are poorly understood. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the qualitative literature on the moral experiences of prescribing maternity providers managing the care of pregnant and postpartum women who use drugs (PPWUD), specifically focused on drug testing and child welfare reporting decisions.MethodsThe Hunt and Carnevale (2011) bioethics framework was used to define moral experience as \"a person's sense that values that he or she deem important are being realized or thwarted in everyday life.\" A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL resulted in 31 eligible articles. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research from the Joanna Briggs Institute (2015). Thematic narrative analysis was used to synthesize results and identify themes.FindingsOverall, maternity providers' experiences were characterized by ethical conflicts influenced by provider-level and policy-level factors. Even when endorsing patient autonomy and parental rights, no maternity providers endorsed continued maternal substance use that placed the fetus or child at significant risk. Structural constraints within healthcare systems and punitive laws were cited as significant barriers to providing optimal care to PPWUD. Biased drug testing protocols and some child welfare reporting policies created ethical conflict by placing maternity providers' relationship with their patients in opposition to their legal and ethical responsibility to report child maltreatment.ImplicationsMore rigorous characterization of these moral experiences is needed to support the development of provider-level interventions and policy-level changes as maternity providers care for both mothers and children impacted by drug use.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251333368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251333368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAddressing drug use among pregnant and postpartum women is complicated by the social, ethical, and legal interplay between maternal and child needs. The moral experiences of providers as they care for this population are poorly understood. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the qualitative literature on the moral experiences of prescribing maternity providers managing the care of pregnant and postpartum women who use drugs (PPWUD), specifically focused on drug testing and child welfare reporting decisions.MethodsThe Hunt and Carnevale (2011) bioethics framework was used to define moral experience as "a person's sense that values that he or she deem important are being realized or thwarted in everyday life." A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL resulted in 31 eligible articles. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research from the Joanna Briggs Institute (2015). Thematic narrative analysis was used to synthesize results and identify themes.FindingsOverall, maternity providers' experiences were characterized by ethical conflicts influenced by provider-level and policy-level factors. Even when endorsing patient autonomy and parental rights, no maternity providers endorsed continued maternal substance use that placed the fetus or child at significant risk. Structural constraints within healthcare systems and punitive laws were cited as significant barriers to providing optimal care to PPWUD. Biased drug testing protocols and some child welfare reporting policies created ethical conflict by placing maternity providers' relationship with their patients in opposition to their legal and ethical responsibility to report child maltreatment.ImplicationsMore rigorous characterization of these moral experiences is needed to support the development of provider-level interventions and policy-level changes as maternity providers care for both mothers and children impacted by drug use.

产妇服务提供者处理产妇吸毒问题的道德经验。
背景:处理孕妇和产后妇女的药物使用问题因母亲和儿童需求之间的社会、伦理和法律相互作用而变得复杂。人们对医疗服务提供者在照顾这一人群时的道德经验知之甚少。本综述的目的是综合定性文献的道德经验的处方产科医生管理谁使用药物的孕妇和产后妇女的护理(PPWUD),特别侧重于药物测试和儿童福利报告的决定。方法使用Hunt和Carnevale(2011)的生物伦理学框架将道德经验定义为“一个人对他或她认为重要的价值观在日常生活中正在实现或受挫的感觉”。系统检索PubMed、PsycINFO和CINAHL,得到31篇符合条件的文章。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(2015)的定性研究关键评估清单评估研究质量。主题叙事分析用于综合结果和识别主题。结果发现,总体而言,产科服务提供者的经验具有受提供者层面和政策层面因素影响的伦理冲突特征。即使支持病人的自主权和父母的权利,也没有产科医生支持继续使用将胎儿或儿童置于重大风险中的母体物质。医疗保健系统和惩罚性法律中的结构性限制被认为是为PPWUD提供最佳护理的重大障碍。有偏见的药物测试协议和一些儿童福利报告政策将产科医生与病人的关系与他们报告虐待儿童的法律和道德责任对立起来,从而产生了道德冲突。影响需要更严格地描述这些道德经验,以支持提供者层面的干预措施的发展和政策层面的变化,因为产科提供者同时照顾受药物使用影响的母亲和儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信