Combining Dual Biologics Therapy for Severe Asthma: A Series of Ten Cases.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2025-04-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S507008
Yan Chen, Lu Wang, Jiaxing Xie
{"title":"Combining Dual Biologics Therapy for Severe Asthma: A Series of Ten Cases.","authors":"Yan Chen, Lu Wang, Jiaxing Xie","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S507008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologic therapy has revolutionized the management of severe asthma, but a subset of patients with severe asthma exhibits symptoms inadequately controlled by monotherapy, potentially due to the involvement of multi-type 2 pathways. Dual biologic therapy has emerged as a promising strategy, but its efficacy and safety are not yet fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the characteristics, endotyping features, decision-making process and therapeutic response of patients with severe asthma on dual biologic therapy in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present ten patients on dual biologics for severe asthma. The biologic combinations include mepolizumab+ dupilumab (n=7), benralizumab+dupilumab (n=1), omazulab+mepolizumab (n=2). Therapeutic response was assessed by type 2 inflammation biomarkers, symptom control, frequency of acute exacerbations, daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our 10 cases, six of them are women, the mean age was 56±15 years old. The mean duration of combination therapy use was 13.5 months (range from 4 to 36 months). Dual biologic therapy was initiated because of inadequate asthma control (N1, N2, N6), poor control of comorbidities (N5, N7, N8, N9) or anti-IL4/13R-induced hypereosinophilia (N3, N4, N5, N7, N10) when treated with a single biologic agent. All ten patients exhibited good tolerance to the combined biologic therapies, leading to improvements in asthma and comorbidity management, and a reduction in OCS usage. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dual biologics have been shown to be both effective and safe. However, more studies are needed to fully assess the long-term benefits and potential risks of different combinations of biologic treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"18 ","pages":"507-517"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S507008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biologic therapy has revolutionized the management of severe asthma, but a subset of patients with severe asthma exhibits symptoms inadequately controlled by monotherapy, potentially due to the involvement of multi-type 2 pathways. Dual biologic therapy has emerged as a promising strategy, but its efficacy and safety are not yet fully understood.

Objective: To describe the characteristics, endotyping features, decision-making process and therapeutic response of patients with severe asthma on dual biologic therapy in a real-world setting.

Methods: We present ten patients on dual biologics for severe asthma. The biologic combinations include mepolizumab+ dupilumab (n=7), benralizumab+dupilumab (n=1), omazulab+mepolizumab (n=2). Therapeutic response was assessed by type 2 inflammation biomarkers, symptom control, frequency of acute exacerbations, daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage and side effects.

Results: In our 10 cases, six of them are women, the mean age was 56±15 years old. The mean duration of combination therapy use was 13.5 months (range from 4 to 36 months). Dual biologic therapy was initiated because of inadequate asthma control (N1, N2, N6), poor control of comorbidities (N5, N7, N8, N9) or anti-IL4/13R-induced hypereosinophilia (N3, N4, N5, N7, N10) when treated with a single biologic agent. All ten patients exhibited good tolerance to the combined biologic therapies, leading to improvements in asthma and comorbidity management, and a reduction in OCS usage. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Dual biologics have been shown to be both effective and safe. However, more studies are needed to fully assess the long-term benefits and potential risks of different combinations of biologic treatments.

双重生物制剂联合治疗重症哮喘10例
背景:生物治疗已经彻底改变了严重哮喘的治疗,但是一部分严重哮喘患者表现出单药治疗不能充分控制症状,这可能是由于多种2型通路的参与。双重生物治疗已成为一种很有前景的治疗策略,但其有效性和安全性尚未完全了解。目的:描述现实环境中重症哮喘患者双重生物治疗的特点、内源性特征、决策过程和治疗反应。方法:对10例重症哮喘患者采用双生物制剂治疗。生物制剂组合包括mepolizumab+ dupilumab (n=7)、benralizumab+dupilumab (n=1)、omazulab+mepolizumab (n=2)。通过2型炎症生物标志物、症状控制、急性加重频率、每日口服皮质类固醇(OCS)剂量和副作用评估治疗效果。结果:10例患者中,女性6例,平均年龄56±15岁。联合治疗的平均持续时间为13.5个月(范围从4到36个月)。由于哮喘控制不足(N1, N2, N6),合共病控制不佳(N5, N7, N8, N9)或抗il / 13r诱导的嗜酸性粒细胞增多症(N3, N4, N5, N7, N10),当使用单一生物制剂治疗时,开始双生物治疗。所有10例患者对联合生物疗法均表现出良好的耐受性,从而改善了哮喘和合并症的管理,并减少了OCS的使用。无严重不良事件报告。结论:双重生物制剂是安全有效的。然而,需要更多的研究来充分评估不同生物治疗组合的长期益处和潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信