Ying Jie Cui, Wen Xue Piao, Yong Chae Jung, Hyun Jin Cho, Min-Woong Kang
{"title":"Video-assisted thoracoscopy with two-lung ventilation and CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: propensity score matching comparison.","authors":"Ying Jie Cui, Wen Xue Piao, Yong Chae Jung, Hyun Jin Cho, Min-Woong Kang","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-1749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is commonly treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), which traditionally requires one-lung ventilation (OLV) with double-lumen endotracheal intubation to optimize the surgical field. However, OLV may be associated with complications such as airway trauma and postoperative sore throat. In contrast, two-lung ventilation (TLV) with CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation has been proposed as an alternative that may reduce airway-related complications while maintaining adequate visualization. This study assessed the feasibility of VATS with TLV and CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation for PSP compared to the conventional OLV approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 181 patients with PSP treated at our center between July 2020 and December 2023; of these, 134 underwent thoracoscopic bullectomy. Fifty-six patients received VATS with TLV and CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation. Seventy-eight patients underwent OLV via double-lumen endotracheal intubation. Patient data were categorized into groups based on the minimization of bias between those receiving TLV and those receiving OLV, following analysis matched by propensity scores. A comparative analysis across these groups was also conducted, focusing on demographic data and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TLV group demonstrated several advantages, including shorter anesthesia induction time (13.45±5.25 min, P=0.01), shorter total anesthesia time (63.18±14.45 min, P=0.003), fewer days of chest tube drainage (1.41±1.22 days, P=0.04), shorter postoperative hospital stay (2.36±0.88 days, P=0.01), lower wedge resection specimen weight (3.21±2.5 g, P=0.03), fewer instances of postoperative ipsilateral and contralateral recurrence, and lower likelihood of short-term recurrence. No significant differences were found in surgical time (P=0.17), anesthesia recovery time (P=0.48), use of endostaplers (P=0.35), number of wedge resections (P=0.21), and pleurodesis (P=0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In appropriately selected patients, TLV appears to be a viable option that does not increase recurrence risk compared to OLV while offering the benefit of a shorter anesthesia duration. Therefore, this method may be suitable for patients with PSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"17 3","pages":"1217-1227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is commonly treated with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), which traditionally requires one-lung ventilation (OLV) with double-lumen endotracheal intubation to optimize the surgical field. However, OLV may be associated with complications such as airway trauma and postoperative sore throat. In contrast, two-lung ventilation (TLV) with CO2 insufflation has been proposed as an alternative that may reduce airway-related complications while maintaining adequate visualization. This study assessed the feasibility of VATS with TLV and CO2 insufflation for PSP compared to the conventional OLV approach.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 181 patients with PSP treated at our center between July 2020 and December 2023; of these, 134 underwent thoracoscopic bullectomy. Fifty-six patients received VATS with TLV and CO2 insufflation. Seventy-eight patients underwent OLV via double-lumen endotracheal intubation. Patient data were categorized into groups based on the minimization of bias between those receiving TLV and those receiving OLV, following analysis matched by propensity scores. A comparative analysis across these groups was also conducted, focusing on demographic data and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
Results: The TLV group demonstrated several advantages, including shorter anesthesia induction time (13.45±5.25 min, P=0.01), shorter total anesthesia time (63.18±14.45 min, P=0.003), fewer days of chest tube drainage (1.41±1.22 days, P=0.04), shorter postoperative hospital stay (2.36±0.88 days, P=0.01), lower wedge resection specimen weight (3.21±2.5 g, P=0.03), fewer instances of postoperative ipsilateral and contralateral recurrence, and lower likelihood of short-term recurrence. No significant differences were found in surgical time (P=0.17), anesthesia recovery time (P=0.48), use of endostaplers (P=0.35), number of wedge resections (P=0.21), and pleurodesis (P=0.73).
Conclusions: In appropriately selected patients, TLV appears to be a viable option that does not increase recurrence risk compared to OLV while offering the benefit of a shorter anesthesia duration. Therefore, this method may be suitable for patients with PSP.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.