General and Treatment-Specific Outcomes with Osseointegrated Implants in Auricular, Nasal, and Orbital Prosthetic Reconstruction.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3390/cmtr18010016
Morgan M Sandelski, Deema Martini, Todd M Kubon, Greg G Gion, Amy L Pittman
{"title":"General and Treatment-Specific Outcomes with Osseointegrated Implants in Auricular, Nasal, and Orbital Prosthetic Reconstruction.","authors":"Morgan M Sandelski, Deema Martini, Todd M Kubon, Greg G Gion, Amy L Pittman","doi":"10.3390/cmtr18010016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osseointegrated implants outside of dental restoration remain an integral area of facial reconstruction in which more outcomes data is needed. We aimed to describe our 13-year experience using osseointegrated implants for orbital, nasal, and auricular reconstruction, looking at general outcomes, including radiated and surgically manipulated bone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review covered demographics and outcomes from January 2008 to August 2021 in patients who underwent an orbital exenteration, partial or total rhinectomy, and partial or total auriculectomy with subsequent osseointegrated implant placement. We hypothesized radiation would increase the failure rate of implants and prostheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 79 implants placed in 27 patients, with over half of the patients requiring implants for reconstruction because of malignancy. The success rate was 86%. Complications were uncommon. Only 2 (7.4%) patients were unable to use their prosthesis. Prior radiation and surgery to the bone were associated with an increased risk of loss of implant (<i>p</i> = 0.008 and <i>p</i> = 0.007, respectively) but not associated with other complications or prosthesis non-viability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Osseointegrated implants are a reliable, permanent option for a realistic prosthesis. Radiation and prior surgery are significantly associated with an increased risk of implant failure but not associated with the inability to use the prosthesis. Regardless of prior treatments, bone-retained implants should be considered in facial reconstruction, especially after failing autologous repair or with concerns for cosmetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"18 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18010016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osseointegrated implants outside of dental restoration remain an integral area of facial reconstruction in which more outcomes data is needed. We aimed to describe our 13-year experience using osseointegrated implants for orbital, nasal, and auricular reconstruction, looking at general outcomes, including radiated and surgically manipulated bone.

Methods: This retrospective chart review covered demographics and outcomes from January 2008 to August 2021 in patients who underwent an orbital exenteration, partial or total rhinectomy, and partial or total auriculectomy with subsequent osseointegrated implant placement. We hypothesized radiation would increase the failure rate of implants and prostheses.

Results: There were 79 implants placed in 27 patients, with over half of the patients requiring implants for reconstruction because of malignancy. The success rate was 86%. Complications were uncommon. Only 2 (7.4%) patients were unable to use their prosthesis. Prior radiation and surgery to the bone were associated with an increased risk of loss of implant (p = 0.008 and p = 0.007, respectively) but not associated with other complications or prosthesis non-viability.

Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants are a reliable, permanent option for a realistic prosthesis. Radiation and prior surgery are significantly associated with an increased risk of implant failure but not associated with the inability to use the prosthesis. Regardless of prior treatments, bone-retained implants should be considered in facial reconstruction, especially after failing autologous repair or with concerns for cosmetic outcomes.

骨整合种植体在耳、鼻、眶假体重建中的一般和治疗特异性结果。
背景:牙体修复之外的骨整合种植体仍然是面部重建的一个重要领域,需要更多的结果数据。我们的目的是描述我们13年来使用骨整合植入物进行眶、鼻和耳廓重建的经验,观察一般结果,包括放射和手术操作骨。方法:该回顾性图表回顾了2008年1月至2021年8月期间接受眶内清除术、部分或全部鼻切除术、部分或全部耳廓切除术并随后植入骨整合种植体的患者的人口统计学和结果。我们假设辐射会增加种植体和假体的失败率。结果:27例患者共植入种植体79枚,其中半数以上患者因恶性肿瘤需要种植体重建。成功率为86%。并发症不常见。仅有2例(7.4%)患者不能使用义肢。先前的骨放射和手术与植入物丢失的风险增加相关(分别为p = 0.008和p = 0.007),但与其他并发症或假体无法生存无关。结论:骨整合种植体是一种可靠的、永久性的选择。放疗和既往手术与假体失败风险增加显著相关,但与无法使用假体无关。无论先前的治疗如何,骨保留植入物在面部重建中都应被考虑,特别是在自体修复失败或考虑到美容结果后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信