Motivations to use a novel hormonal male contraceptive: Perspectives from male contraceptive clinical trial participants.

Jessica D Gipson, Marta Bornstein, Andrew Duong, Brian T Nguyen
{"title":"Motivations to use a novel hormonal male contraceptive: Perspectives from male contraceptive clinical trial participants.","authors":"Jessica D Gipson, Marta Bornstein, Andrew Duong, Brian T Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Most existing studies on men's willingness to use novel hormonal male contraceptives (HMCs) rely on survey data and focus on the hypothetical use of HMCs. The aim of this in-depth, qualitative study was to elicit the perspectives of HMC clinical trial participants - men who have actually used an HMC - to describe their motivations for using HMCs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In 2017-18 we conducted 30 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a sample of men who participated in early-stage HMC clinical trials in Los Angeles or Seattle to explore their experiences with and motivations for trialing a HMC. Using thematic analysis, we analyzed deidentified transcripts using deductive and inductive codes, summarizing key themes using a socioecological framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants averaged 35 years old (range: 22-52) and were ethnically and sociodemographically diverse. Men's motivations for using an HMC centered on societal-level factors (i.e., concerns regarding 'overpopulation' and responsible childbearing), partnership factors (concerns regarding entrapment; desire to share in contraceptive responsibility), and individual-level factors (i.e., contraceptive options that maximized pleasure and intimacy; beliefs in men's contraceptive and bodily autonomy).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides the first U.S.-based, in-depth qualitative insights from men who have used HMCs. Men's motivations for participating in HMC clinical trials and wanting to use novel male contraceptives are both numerous and multi-faceted, supporting prevailing survey data on men's willingness to use them once on the market. These data offer insights on how male contraceptives could be marketed to the general public.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Men's motivations vary with respect to participation in hormonal male clinical trials and desire to use HMCs when they become available. All of these motivations - from the broader, societal level, to the individual and partnership level - are critical to assessing the demand for and subsequent marketing of HMCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"110932"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Most existing studies on men's willingness to use novel hormonal male contraceptives (HMCs) rely on survey data and focus on the hypothetical use of HMCs. The aim of this in-depth, qualitative study was to elicit the perspectives of HMC clinical trial participants - men who have actually used an HMC - to describe their motivations for using HMCs.

Study design: In 2017-18 we conducted 30 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a sample of men who participated in early-stage HMC clinical trials in Los Angeles or Seattle to explore their experiences with and motivations for trialing a HMC. Using thematic analysis, we analyzed deidentified transcripts using deductive and inductive codes, summarizing key themes using a socioecological framework.

Results: Participants averaged 35 years old (range: 22-52) and were ethnically and sociodemographically diverse. Men's motivations for using an HMC centered on societal-level factors (i.e., concerns regarding 'overpopulation' and responsible childbearing), partnership factors (concerns regarding entrapment; desire to share in contraceptive responsibility), and individual-level factors (i.e., contraceptive options that maximized pleasure and intimacy; beliefs in men's contraceptive and bodily autonomy).

Conclusions: This study provides the first U.S.-based, in-depth qualitative insights from men who have used HMCs. Men's motivations for participating in HMC clinical trials and wanting to use novel male contraceptives are both numerous and multi-faceted, supporting prevailing survey data on men's willingness to use them once on the market. These data offer insights on how male contraceptives could be marketed to the general public.

Implications: Men's motivations vary with respect to participation in hormonal male clinical trials and desire to use HMCs when they become available. All of these motivations - from the broader, societal level, to the individual and partnership level - are critical to assessing the demand for and subsequent marketing of HMCs.

使用一种新型激素男性避孕药的动机:来自男性避孕药临床试验参与者的观点。
目的:现有关于男性使用新型激素男性避孕药意愿的研究大多依赖于调查数据,并且主要集中在假设使用激素男性避孕药。这项深入的定性研究的目的是引出HMC临床试验参与者的观点-实际使用HMC的男性-描述他们使用HMC的动机。研究设计:在2017- 2018年,我们对在洛杉矶或西雅图参加早期HMC临床试验的男性样本进行了30次深入的半结构化访谈,以探索他们试验HMC的经历和动机。通过主题分析,我们使用演绎和归纳代码分析了去识别的转录本,并使用社会生态框架总结了关键主题。结果:参与者平均年龄为35岁(范围:22-52岁),种族和社会人口统计学上各不相同。男性使用HMC的动机主要集中在社会层面的因素(即,对“人口过剩”和负责任的生育的担忧),伙伴关系因素(对陷阱的担忧;分担避孕责任的愿望),以及个人层面的因素(即,使快乐和亲密最大化的避孕选择;对男性避孕和身体自主的信仰)。结论:这项研究提供了第一个以美国为基础的,对使用过hmc的男性进行深入定性分析的研究。男性参与HMC临床试验和想要使用新型男性避孕药具的动机是多方面的,这支持了关于男性一旦进入市场就愿意使用的主流调查数据。这些数据为如何向公众推销男性避孕药提供了见解。含义:男性参与激素男性临床试验的动机不同,当hmc可用时,他们希望使用hmc。所有这些动机——从更广泛的社会层面,到个人和伙伴关系层面——对于评估对医疗保健服务的需求和随后的营销至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信