Jessica D Gipson, Marta Bornstein, Andrew Duong, Brian T Nguyen
{"title":"Motivations to use a novel hormonal male contraceptive: Perspectives from male contraceptive clinical trial participants.","authors":"Jessica D Gipson, Marta Bornstein, Andrew Duong, Brian T Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Most existing studies on men's willingness to use novel hormonal male contraceptives (HMCs) rely on survey data and focus on the hypothetical use of HMCs. The aim of this in-depth, qualitative study was to elicit the perspectives of HMC clinical trial participants - men who have actually used an HMC - to describe their motivations for using HMCs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In 2017-18 we conducted 30 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a sample of men who participated in early-stage HMC clinical trials in Los Angeles or Seattle to explore their experiences with and motivations for trialing a HMC. Using thematic analysis, we analyzed deidentified transcripts using deductive and inductive codes, summarizing key themes using a socioecological framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants averaged 35 years old (range: 22-52) and were ethnically and sociodemographically diverse. Men's motivations for using an HMC centered on societal-level factors (i.e., concerns regarding 'overpopulation' and responsible childbearing), partnership factors (concerns regarding entrapment; desire to share in contraceptive responsibility), and individual-level factors (i.e., contraceptive options that maximized pleasure and intimacy; beliefs in men's contraceptive and bodily autonomy).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides the first U.S.-based, in-depth qualitative insights from men who have used HMCs. Men's motivations for participating in HMC clinical trials and wanting to use novel male contraceptives are both numerous and multi-faceted, supporting prevailing survey data on men's willingness to use them once on the market. These data offer insights on how male contraceptives could be marketed to the general public.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Men's motivations vary with respect to participation in hormonal male clinical trials and desire to use HMCs when they become available. All of these motivations - from the broader, societal level, to the individual and partnership level - are critical to assessing the demand for and subsequent marketing of HMCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"110932"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Most existing studies on men's willingness to use novel hormonal male contraceptives (HMCs) rely on survey data and focus on the hypothetical use of HMCs. The aim of this in-depth, qualitative study was to elicit the perspectives of HMC clinical trial participants - men who have actually used an HMC - to describe their motivations for using HMCs.
Study design: In 2017-18 we conducted 30 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a sample of men who participated in early-stage HMC clinical trials in Los Angeles or Seattle to explore their experiences with and motivations for trialing a HMC. Using thematic analysis, we analyzed deidentified transcripts using deductive and inductive codes, summarizing key themes using a socioecological framework.
Results: Participants averaged 35 years old (range: 22-52) and were ethnically and sociodemographically diverse. Men's motivations for using an HMC centered on societal-level factors (i.e., concerns regarding 'overpopulation' and responsible childbearing), partnership factors (concerns regarding entrapment; desire to share in contraceptive responsibility), and individual-level factors (i.e., contraceptive options that maximized pleasure and intimacy; beliefs in men's contraceptive and bodily autonomy).
Conclusions: This study provides the first U.S.-based, in-depth qualitative insights from men who have used HMCs. Men's motivations for participating in HMC clinical trials and wanting to use novel male contraceptives are both numerous and multi-faceted, supporting prevailing survey data on men's willingness to use them once on the market. These data offer insights on how male contraceptives could be marketed to the general public.
Implications: Men's motivations vary with respect to participation in hormonal male clinical trials and desire to use HMCs when they become available. All of these motivations - from the broader, societal level, to the individual and partnership level - are critical to assessing the demand for and subsequent marketing of HMCs.