Analgesic efficacy of a quadratus lumborum block and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block in cesarean deliveries: a randomized study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Serpil Sehirlioglu, Dondu G Moralar, Gullu C Isik, Talal Cakmak, Tevfik Kacar
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy of a quadratus lumborum block and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block in cesarean deliveries: a randomized study.","authors":"Serpil Sehirlioglu, Dondu G Moralar, Gullu C Isik, Talal Cakmak, Tevfik Kacar","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18513-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve (II-IH) blocks are used as components of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain relief following cesarean delivery. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of a quadratus lumborum block and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block applied to patients who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia on total opioid analgesic consumption and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores within the first 24 hours postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy pregnant women who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were analyzed. The women were randomized into the QLB group (N.=34) and the II-IH group (N.=36). Postoperatively, bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block was applied to the QLB group and bilateral ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block was applied to the II-IH group. Tramadol consumption, NRS scores, and drug side effects were recorded at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total tramadol consumption within the first 24-hours was significantly lower in the QLB Group than in the II-IH Grup (41.2±65.7 vs. 94.4±95.5mg, respectively; P=0.013). The NRS Score was low in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. We found that 67.6% of patients in the QLB group and 41.7% of patients in the II-IH group did not require rescue analgesia within the first 24 hours (P=0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quadratus lumborum block and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric blocks applied for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery are associated with a low NRS Score in the first 24 hours. Quadratus lumborum block is associated with lower opioid consumption than an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block, suggesting that a quadratus lumborum block is preferable in cesarean delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18513-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve (II-IH) blocks are used as components of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain relief following cesarean delivery. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of a quadratus lumborum block and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block applied to patients who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia on total opioid analgesic consumption and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores within the first 24 hours postoperatively.

Methods: Seventy pregnant women who underwent cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were analyzed. The women were randomized into the QLB group (N.=34) and the II-IH group (N.=36). Postoperatively, bilateral anterior quadratus lumborum block was applied to the QLB group and bilateral ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block was applied to the II-IH group. Tramadol consumption, NRS scores, and drug side effects were recorded at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.

Results: Total tramadol consumption within the first 24-hours was significantly lower in the QLB Group than in the II-IH Grup (41.2±65.7 vs. 94.4±95.5mg, respectively; P=0.013). The NRS Score was low in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. We found that 67.6% of patients in the QLB group and 41.7% of patients in the II-IH group did not require rescue analgesia within the first 24 hours (P=0.029).

Conclusions: Quadratus lumborum block and ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric blocks applied for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery are associated with a low NRS Score in the first 24 hours. Quadratus lumborum block is associated with lower opioid consumption than an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric block, suggesting that a quadratus lumborum block is preferable in cesarean delivery.

腰方肌阻滞和髂腹股沟-髂下胃阻滞在剖宫产中的镇痛效果:一项随机研究。
背景:腰方肌阻滞(QLB)和髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞(II-IH)是剖宫产术后多模式镇痛的组成部分。这项前瞻性、随机研究的目的是比较腰方肌阻滞和髂腹股沟-髂下胃阻滞用于腰麻下剖宫产患者术后24小时内阿片类镇痛药总用量和数值评定量表(NRS)评分的疗效。方法:对70例腰麻剖宫产孕妇进行分析。这些妇女被随机分为QLB组(n =34)和II-IH组(n =36)。术后QLB组采用双侧腰前方肌阻滞,II-IH组采用双侧髂腹股沟-髂下胃阻滞。分别于术后2、4、8、12和24小时记录曲马多用量、NRS评分和药物副作用。结果:QLB组前24小时曲马多总消耗量显著低于II-IH组(分别为41.2±65.7 mg和94.4±95.5mg);P = 0.013)。两组患者NRS评分均较低,但两组间差异无统计学意义。我们发现67.6%的QLB组患者和41.7%的II-IH组患者在24小时内不需要急救镇痛(P=0.029)。结论:剖宫产术后镇痛采用腰方肌阻滞和髂腹股沟-髂下胃阻滞与前24小时NRS评分较低相关。腰方肌阻滞比髂腹股沟-髂下胃阻滞与更低的阿片类药物消耗相关,提示腰方肌阻滞在剖宫产中更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信