{"title":"Effective Use of Laparoscopic Simulators in Gynecological Training.","authors":"Abdurrahman Hamdi İnan, Ahkam Göksel Kanmaz, Alaattin Karabulut, Sercan Kantarcı, Emrah Töz","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a haptic-enabled laparoscopic simulator in improving the surgical proficiency of residents across different experience levels.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a haptic laparoscopic simulator (LAP Mentor) for gynecological procedures among residents. Participants were divided into three groups based on experience: senior, midlevel, and junior residents, and completed simulations of bilateral tubal ligation and prophylactic oophorectomy, with performance metrics including time taken and instrument movements recorded.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>While group 1 generally scored higher, no statistically significant differences were found between groups. Major bleeding incidents were rare, occurring once in group 2 during tubal ligation and twice in group 3 during prophylactic oophorectomy. Within-group analysis revealed improvements for group 2, which showed reduced duration (<i>P</i> = .006), left-hand movements (<i>P</i> = .009), and right-hand movements (<i>P</i> = .002) and group 3 also achieved statistically significant decreases in duration (<i>P</i> = .004), left-hand movements (<i>P</i> = .001), and right-hand movements (<i>P</i> = .003), indicating skill development over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited but regular access to advanced simulators-offered two or three times annually-could empower residency programs to meet contemporary surgical training standards without incurring prohibitive costs, ensuring broader access to high-quality skills development.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a haptic-enabled laparoscopic simulator in improving the surgical proficiency of residents across different experience levels.
Design: This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a haptic laparoscopic simulator (LAP Mentor) for gynecological procedures among residents. Participants were divided into three groups based on experience: senior, midlevel, and junior residents, and completed simulations of bilateral tubal ligation and prophylactic oophorectomy, with performance metrics including time taken and instrument movements recorded.
Result: While group 1 generally scored higher, no statistically significant differences were found between groups. Major bleeding incidents were rare, occurring once in group 2 during tubal ligation and twice in group 3 during prophylactic oophorectomy. Within-group analysis revealed improvements for group 2, which showed reduced duration (P = .006), left-hand movements (P = .009), and right-hand movements (P = .002) and group 3 also achieved statistically significant decreases in duration (P = .004), left-hand movements (P = .001), and right-hand movements (P = .003), indicating skill development over time.
Conclusion: Limited but regular access to advanced simulators-offered two or three times annually-could empower residency programs to meet contemporary surgical training standards without incurring prohibitive costs, ensuring broader access to high-quality skills development.
期刊介绍:
JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.