Definition of Response in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Sulagna Roy, Giuseppe Colacicco, Giorgia Frigeri, Fabio Tarantino, Emilia Matera, Maria Giuseppina Petruzzelli, Samuele Cortese
{"title":"Definition of Response in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sulagna Roy, Giuseppe Colacicco, Giorgia Frigeri, Fabio Tarantino, Emilia Matera, Maria Giuseppina Petruzzelli, Samuele Cortese","doi":"10.1089/cap.2025.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating medication efficacy. The absence of a universal definition of treatment response, based on the degree of symptom improvement measured by standardized rating scales in the field of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), makes it difficult to compare treatment outcomes across RCTs. Here, we aimed to assess to what extent and how \"treatment response\" is defined across RCTs of ADHD medications. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We identified eligible RCTs via the MED-ADHD database (https://med-adhd.org/), which compiles RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD, based on a comprehensive search in multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE, up to 17 January 2025, alongside additional unpublished information gathered from manufacturers/study authors. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of 167 RCTs in MED-ADHD, 88 defined treatment response based on reductions in ADHD core symptom severity using rating scale scores. The most frequently used threshold was a ≥30% reduction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-RS) scores, with other RCTs using ≥25%, ≥40%, or ≥50%. In addition, RCTs applied similar cutoff values to alternative scales, including Conner's Adult ADHD Rating Scale, SNAP-IV, Adult ADHD Investigator Rating Scale, and Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale. However, 79 studies did not specify any response threshold. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our review underscores and quantitatively defines the inconsistency in the definition of treatment response across ADHD medication trials, highlighting the urgent need for the field to reach a consensus on the use of a standardized definition of \"treatment response\" for each rating scale, based on the percentage reduction in ADHD core symptom severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2025.0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating medication efficacy. The absence of a universal definition of treatment response, based on the degree of symptom improvement measured by standardized rating scales in the field of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), makes it difficult to compare treatment outcomes across RCTs. Here, we aimed to assess to what extent and how "treatment response" is defined across RCTs of ADHD medications. Methods: We identified eligible RCTs via the MED-ADHD database (https://med-adhd.org/), which compiles RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD, based on a comprehensive search in multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE, up to 17 January 2025, alongside additional unpublished information gathered from manufacturers/study authors. Results: Out of 167 RCTs in MED-ADHD, 88 defined treatment response based on reductions in ADHD core symptom severity using rating scale scores. The most frequently used threshold was a ≥30% reduction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-RS) scores, with other RCTs using ≥25%, ≥40%, or ≥50%. In addition, RCTs applied similar cutoff values to alternative scales, including Conner's Adult ADHD Rating Scale, SNAP-IV, Adult ADHD Investigator Rating Scale, and Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale. However, 79 studies did not specify any response threshold. Conclusion: Our review underscores and quantitatively defines the inconsistency in the definition of treatment response across ADHD medication trials, highlighting the urgent need for the field to reach a consensus on the use of a standardized definition of "treatment response" for each rating scale, based on the percentage reduction in ADHD core symptom severity.

终身注意缺陷/多动障碍药物随机对照试验中反应的定义:一项系统综述。
目的:随机对照试验(rct)是评价药物疗效的金标准。在注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)领域,缺乏一个基于标准化评定量表测量的症状改善程度的治疗反应的通用定义,这使得比较不同随机对照试验的治疗结果变得困难。在这里,我们旨在评估ADHD药物随机对照试验中“治疗反应”的定义程度和方式。方法:我们通过MED-ADHD数据库(https://med-adhd.org/)确定了符合条件的随机对照试验,该数据库基于多个电子数据库的综合检索,包括PubMed、BIOSIS Previews、CINAHL、Cochrane中央对照试验登记处和EMBASE,截至2025年1月17日,以及从制造商/研究作者收集的其他未发表的信息,汇集了评估儿童、青少年和成人ADHD药物治疗有效性和安全性的随机对照试验。结果:167项关于MED-ADHD的随机对照试验中,88项根据ADHD核心症状严重程度的降低使用评定量表评分来定义治疗反应。最常用的阈值是注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD-RS)得分降低≥30%,其他rct使用≥25%,≥40%或≥50%。此外,随机对照试验对其他量表采用了类似的截止值,包括Conner's成人ADHD评定量表、SNAP-IV、成人ADHD调查员评定量表和Wender-Reimherr成人注意缺陷障碍量表。然而,79项研究没有指定任何反应阈值。结论:我们的综述强调并定量定义了ADHD药物试验中治疗反应定义的不一致性,强调了该领域迫切需要达成共识,基于ADHD核心症状严重程度降低的百分比,对每个评分量表使用标准化的“治疗反应”定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (JCAP) is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering the clinical aspects of treating this patient population with psychotropic medications including side effects and interactions, standard doses, and research on new and existing medications. The Journal includes information on related areas of medical sciences such as advances in developmental pharmacokinetics, developmental neuroscience, metabolism, nutrition, molecular genetics, and more. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology coverage includes: New drugs and treatment strategies including the use of psycho-stimulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and atypical antipsychotics New developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, along with other disorders Reports of common and rare Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) including: hyperprolactinemia, galactorrhea, weight gain/loss, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, switching phenomena, sudden death, and the potential increase of suicide. Outcomes research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信