Intervention for hospitalized people with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Melissa B Weimer, Michele J Buonora, Alexandra M Hajduk, Adam L Ackerman, Krishna R Daggula, William C Becker, Sarwat I Chaudhry, David A Fiellin
{"title":"Intervention for hospitalized people with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm: A pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Melissa B Weimer, Michele J Buonora, Alexandra M Hajduk, Adam L Ackerman, Krishna R Daggula, William C Becker, Sarwat I Chaudhry, David A Fiellin","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of analgesia in people hospitalized with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm is challenging. While opioid stewardship programs could provide guidance, their feasibility in this population has not been examined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a case identification tool and evaluate the feasibility of an electronic medical record (EMR)-delivered opioid stewardship and pain intervention among hospitalized people with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After developing and evaluating the operating characteristics of a case identification tool to identify people with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm, hospitalized adults with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm were randomized to an EMR-delivered opioid stewardship and pain intervention versus usual care. Primary outcomes were feasibility-based. Exploratory outcomes were pain-related clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The case identification tool had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 95.7%. The trial recruited 52/97 (54%) of potential participants who completed 52/52 (100%) potential assessments and of whom 45/52 (87%) were retained in the study at 4 weeks, demonstrating feasibility. On average, both treatment arms received 56% of the recommended guideline-concordant care and there was no significant difference in opioid and pain-related care in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is both feasible to develop an EMR-based tool to prospectively identify hospitalized people with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm as well as recruit these individuals to an EMR-delivered opioid stewardship and pain intervention. Additional strategies to support the provision of guideline-concordant care may be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of analgesia in people hospitalized with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm is challenging. While opioid stewardship programs could provide guidance, their feasibility in this population has not been examined.

Objectives: To develop a case identification tool and evaluate the feasibility of an electronic medical record (EMR)-delivered opioid stewardship and pain intervention among hospitalized people with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm.

Methods: After developing and evaluating the operating characteristics of a case identification tool to identify people with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm, hospitalized adults with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm were randomized to an EMR-delivered opioid stewardship and pain intervention versus usual care. Primary outcomes were feasibility-based. Exploratory outcomes were pain-related clinical outcomes.

Results: The case identification tool had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 95.7%. The trial recruited 52/97 (54%) of potential participants who completed 52/52 (100%) potential assessments and of whom 45/52 (87%) were retained in the study at 4 weeks, demonstrating feasibility. On average, both treatment arms received 56% of the recommended guideline-concordant care and there was no significant difference in opioid and pain-related care in the two groups.

Conclusion: It is both feasible to develop an EMR-based tool to prospectively identify hospitalized people with chronic pain and elevated risk for opioid-related harm as well as recruit these individuals to an EMR-delivered opioid stewardship and pain intervention. Additional strategies to support the provision of guideline-concordant care may be warranted.

慢性疼痛和阿片类药物相关伤害风险升高的住院患者的干预:一项试点随机对照试验
背景:慢性疼痛和阿片类药物相关伤害风险升高的住院患者的镇痛管理具有挑战性。虽然阿片类药物管理项目可以提供指导,但它们在这一人群中的可行性尚未得到检验。目的:开发一种病例识别工具,并评估电子病历(EMR)提供的阿片类药物管理和疼痛干预在慢性疼痛和阿片类药物相关伤害风险升高的住院患者中的可行性。方法:在开发和评估病例识别工具的操作特征以识别慢性疼痛和阿片类药物相关伤害风险升高的人群后,慢性疼痛和阿片类药物相关伤害风险升高的住院成年人被随机分配到emr提供的阿片类药物管理和疼痛干预与常规护理。主要结局以可行性为基础。探索性结果为与疼痛相关的临床结果。结果:病例鉴别工具的敏感性为88.9%,特异性为95.7%。试验招募了52/97(54%)名潜在参与者,他们完成了52/52(100%)的潜在评估,其中45/52(87%)人在4周时保留在研究中,证明了可行性。平均而言,两个治疗组接受了56%的推荐指南一致性护理,两组在阿片类药物和疼痛相关护理方面没有显着差异。结论:开发一种基于emr的工具来前瞻性地识别患有慢性疼痛和阿片类药物相关伤害风险升高的住院患者,并招募这些个体进行emr提供的阿片类药物管理和疼痛干预是可行的。可能有必要采取其他战略来支持提供符合指南的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信