Corey Peng, Josie Thomas, Mahasen Samhouri, Jennifer Babcock, Melody Boudreaux Nelson
{"title":"Expedited response to unsafe conditions: an academic health system approach.","authors":"Corey Peng, Josie Thomas, Mahasen Samhouri, Jennifer Babcock, Melody Boudreaux Nelson","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmaf001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments require nonconforming safety event identification, targeted intervention, and evaluation of interventional effectiveness. Without a standardized reporting structure, risk and safety teams will experience ongoing challenges with situational awareness and mitigation strategies in the workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 15-minute risk and safety huddle was initiated. The cadence was set to daily for the first iteration of huddle integration. A subsequent cadence was set to twice weekly, with a Microsoft Teams channel for streamlined communication across all laboratory settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Huddling resulted in an averaged time savings of 14 days (approximately 2 weeks), measured from event to safety report. An observed reduction of 17.6% in employee-reported occupational safety events was noted between quarters 1 and 2 of 2023 and between quarters 1 and 2 of 2024, with a reduction in overall event spending ($458.50 [19.2%]) noted in 4 of the 5 measured safety event categories. An annual reduction in spending ($9568.09 [49.8%]) across all 5 measured safety event categories was noted in the 2022 (preinterventional) and 2023 (postinterventional) time frame.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Laboratories should consider the establishment of a dedicated safety committee and cadenced huddles because such tools are effective for improving safety and communicating occupational hazards.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"500-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmaf001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments require nonconforming safety event identification, targeted intervention, and evaluation of interventional effectiveness. Without a standardized reporting structure, risk and safety teams will experience ongoing challenges with situational awareness and mitigation strategies in the workplace.
Methods: A 15-minute risk and safety huddle was initiated. The cadence was set to daily for the first iteration of huddle integration. A subsequent cadence was set to twice weekly, with a Microsoft Teams channel for streamlined communication across all laboratory settings.
Results: Huddling resulted in an averaged time savings of 14 days (approximately 2 weeks), measured from event to safety report. An observed reduction of 17.6% in employee-reported occupational safety events was noted between quarters 1 and 2 of 2023 and between quarters 1 and 2 of 2024, with a reduction in overall event spending ($458.50 [19.2%]) noted in 4 of the 5 measured safety event categories. An annual reduction in spending ($9568.09 [49.8%]) across all 5 measured safety event categories was noted in the 2022 (preinterventional) and 2023 (postinterventional) time frame.
Discussion: Laboratories should consider the establishment of a dedicated safety committee and cadenced huddles because such tools are effective for improving safety and communicating occupational hazards.