Smart speakers are an acceptable and feasible speech practice tool for children with speech difficulties.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Lauren Makin, Elizabeth Smith, Craig Hedge, Petroc Sumner, Georgie Powell
{"title":"Smart speakers are an acceptable and feasible speech practice tool for children with speech difficulties.","authors":"Lauren Makin, Elizabeth Smith, Craig Hedge, Petroc Sumner, Georgie Powell","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2491636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A record number of children are experiencing speech difficulties. This study explored whether mainstream smart speakers can support speech practice, and assesses a proposed five-factor model for how these improvements occur, based on: spaced learning, immediate feedback, autonomous motivation, reduced social barriers, and increased social interactions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods feasibility study with 11 families of children with speech difficulties. Data included pre- and post-trial speech recordings (rated by 24 naïve raters), activity logs, post-trial surveys for parents and children, and parent interviews. We assessed device use, changes in speech clarity, alignment with the proposed 5-factor model, and barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children used smart speakers on average once daily for approximately 6 commands. Speech clarity ratings improved post-exposure and improvements correlated with device use. Parents noted children spoke more slowly and loudly to the device. Both parent and child reports reflected the 5-factor model, with children showing motivation, spaced engagement, and willingness to repeat commands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Naturalistic use of smart speakers is an acceptable and feasible tool to support speech practice in children with speech difficulties. Parents viewed smart speakers as a useful complement to formal therapy, though frustration when not understood remains a factor for implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2491636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A record number of children are experiencing speech difficulties. This study explored whether mainstream smart speakers can support speech practice, and assesses a proposed five-factor model for how these improvements occur, based on: spaced learning, immediate feedback, autonomous motivation, reduced social barriers, and increased social interactions.

Materials and methods: We conducted a mixed-methods feasibility study with 11 families of children with speech difficulties. Data included pre- and post-trial speech recordings (rated by 24 naïve raters), activity logs, post-trial surveys for parents and children, and parent interviews. We assessed device use, changes in speech clarity, alignment with the proposed 5-factor model, and barriers.

Results: Children used smart speakers on average once daily for approximately 6 commands. Speech clarity ratings improved post-exposure and improvements correlated with device use. Parents noted children spoke more slowly and loudly to the device. Both parent and child reports reflected the 5-factor model, with children showing motivation, spaced engagement, and willingness to repeat commands.

Conclusions: Naturalistic use of smart speakers is an acceptable and feasible tool to support speech practice in children with speech difficulties. Parents viewed smart speakers as a useful complement to formal therapy, though frustration when not understood remains a factor for implementation.

智能音箱对于有语言障碍的儿童来说是一种可接受的、可行的语言练习工具。
目的:有语言障碍的儿童人数创历史新高。本研究探讨了主流智能音箱是否能够支持语言练习,并基于间隔学习、即时反馈、自主动机、减少社会障碍和增加社会互动,评估了一个关于如何实现这些改进的五因素模型。材料和方法:我们对11个言语障碍儿童家庭进行了一项混合方法的可行性研究。数据包括审判前和审判后的语音记录(由24位naïve评分者评分)、活动日志、审判后对父母和孩子的调查以及父母访谈。我们评估了设备的使用、语音清晰度的变化、与提议的五因素模型的一致性以及障碍。结果:儿童平均每天使用一次智能扬声器,大约6个命令。语音清晰度评分在暴露后有所提高,并且与设备使用相关。家长们注意到孩子们对着手机说话更慢、更大声。家长和孩子的报告都反映了五因素模型,孩子们表现出了动力、间隔参与和重复命令的意愿。结论:自然地使用智能音箱是一种可接受和可行的工具来支持言语障碍儿童的言语练习。家长们认为智能音箱是对正式治疗的有益补充,尽管在不被理解时感到沮丧仍然是实施的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信