A Comparison of Two Different Scales in Identifying the Risk of Falls in Leukaemia and Lymphoma Patients.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70221
Erdem Açikel, Nimet Ovayolu, Hatice Güzel
{"title":"A Comparison of Two Different Scales in Identifying the Risk of Falls in Leukaemia and Lymphoma Patients.","authors":"Erdem Açikel, Nimet Ovayolu, Hatice Güzel","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the risk of falls in leukaemia and lymphoma patients using the Itaki Fall Risk Scale and the Fall Risk Assessment Scale Developed by the Delmarva Foundation and compare the data collected.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is descriptive and cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 84 patients diagnosed with leukaemia and lymphoma who were hospitalised in the haematology ward between March 2021 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>Questionnaire, Itaki Fall Risk Scale, Delmarva Foundation Developed Fall Risk Assessment Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected. Appropriate analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to both scales, the risk of falls increased as age, fatigue and pain scores increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the sensitivity of the Itaki Fall Risk Scale (79.6%) was higher than that of the Fall Risk Assessment Scale Developed by the Delmarva Foundation (63.3%) when there was fear of unassisted falling; the risk of falling also increased with increasing age, fatigue and pain scores according to both scales, and there was no difference between the two scales in terms of risk of falling.</p><p><strong>Public contribution: </strong>There is no public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 5","pages":"e70221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to assess the risk of falls in leukaemia and lymphoma patients using the Itaki Fall Risk Scale and the Fall Risk Assessment Scale Developed by the Delmarva Foundation and compare the data collected.

Design: This study is descriptive and cross-sectional.

Methods: The sample consisted of 84 patients diagnosed with leukaemia and lymphoma who were hospitalised in the haematology ward between March 2021 and December 2021.

Data: Questionnaire, Itaki Fall Risk Scale, Delmarva Foundation Developed Fall Risk Assessment Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected. Appropriate analyses were performed.

Results: According to both scales, the risk of falls increased as age, fatigue and pain scores increased.

Conclusions: This study found that the sensitivity of the Itaki Fall Risk Scale (79.6%) was higher than that of the Fall Risk Assessment Scale Developed by the Delmarva Foundation (63.3%) when there was fear of unassisted falling; the risk of falling also increased with increasing age, fatigue and pain scores according to both scales, and there was no difference between the two scales in terms of risk of falling.

Public contribution: There is no public contribution.

两种不同量表在识别白血病和淋巴瘤患者跌倒风险中的比较。
目的:本研究采用由Delmarva基金会开发的Itaki跌倒风险评估量表和跌倒风险评估量表来评估白血病和淋巴瘤患者的跌倒风险,并比较收集到的数据。设计:本研究为描述性和横断面研究。方法:样本包括2021年3月至2021年12月在血液科病房住院的84例诊断为白血病和淋巴瘤的患者。资料:收集问卷、Itaki跌倒风险量表、Delmarva基金会开发的跌倒风险评估量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。进行了适当的分析。结果:根据两种量表,随着年龄、疲劳和疼痛评分的增加,跌倒的风险增加。结论:本研究发现,当存在独立跌倒恐惧时,Itaki跌倒风险量表的敏感性(79.6%)高于Delmarva基金会制定的跌倒风险评估量表(63.3%);跌倒的风险也随着年龄、疲劳和疼痛评分的增加而增加,两种量表在跌倒风险方面没有差异。公共捐助:没有公共捐助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信