Othering and Marginalizing the "Queer" in Rwanda: Findings from Public Perceptions and Lived Experiences of LGBT People.

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s13178-024-01026-y
K Stojanovski, E K Igonya, L T Gutabarwa, E Otukpa, E Mutuku, B A Ushie
{"title":"Othering and Marginalizing the \"Queer\" in Rwanda: Findings from Public Perceptions and Lived Experiences of LGBT People.","authors":"K Stojanovski, E K Igonya, L T Gutabarwa, E Otukpa, E Mutuku, B A Ushie","doi":"10.1007/s13178-024-01026-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The multidimensionality of stigma that LGBT people experience globally necessitates research to explore the processes at work. The study aimed to quantify the level of othering and explore the process of LGBT othering in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a sequential cross-sectional mixed-methods study of LGBT lived experiences in Rwanda. We recruited 499 participants to complete the LGBT-specific survey and 1254 for the non-LGBT survey. We conducted 16 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with non-LGBT participants. For LGBT participants, we completed six focus groups with 59 participants, six in-depth interviews, and three digital storytelling interviews. For the quantitative surveys, we conducted multivariable linear regressions and reported beta coefficients and 95% confidence interval estimates examining LGBT discrimination (LGBT survey) and attitudes toward LGBT (non-LGBT survey). We used deductive and inductive thematic and narrative analysis to analyze the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adjusted analyses of the non-LGBT survey, as compared to those who knew zero LGBT persons, persons who knew more than five had lower negative attitude scores (β =  - 1.3, 95% CI - 2.2, - 0.5), while the score was lower for those that knew one to five (- 0.2), it was not significant (95% CI - 0.8, 0.5). In the LGBT survey, adjusted analyses indicated that there was no significant difference found in discrimination between bisexual, gay, or lesbian participants. However, as compared to cisgender participants, transgender participants had discrimination scores that were 2.1 points higher (95% CI 1.1, 3.0), and gender non-confirming individuals had scores that were one point higher (95% CI 0.2, 1.9). The qualitative findings showcased how societal \"othering\" occurs in the everyday life of LGBT Rwandans, with large ramifications in creating feelings of isolation and hampering one's capacity to live authentically and with dignity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from our study indicate a high level of othering of the LGBT community across multiple domains, including housing, employment, healthcare, education, religion, and family within Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Policy implications: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of social education campaigns about LGBT people, particularly among vital societal role-holders, including healthcare providers and educators. Integrating the rich historical and indigenous culture related to LGBT could be successful in combating anti-West rhetoric.</p>","PeriodicalId":47654,"journal":{"name":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","volume":"22 1","pages":"108-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-024-01026-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The multidimensionality of stigma that LGBT people experience globally necessitates research to explore the processes at work. The study aimed to quantify the level of othering and explore the process of LGBT othering in Rwanda.

Methods: We conducted a sequential cross-sectional mixed-methods study of LGBT lived experiences in Rwanda. We recruited 499 participants to complete the LGBT-specific survey and 1254 for the non-LGBT survey. We conducted 16 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with non-LGBT participants. For LGBT participants, we completed six focus groups with 59 participants, six in-depth interviews, and three digital storytelling interviews. For the quantitative surveys, we conducted multivariable linear regressions and reported beta coefficients and 95% confidence interval estimates examining LGBT discrimination (LGBT survey) and attitudes toward LGBT (non-LGBT survey). We used deductive and inductive thematic and narrative analysis to analyze the qualitative data.

Results: In adjusted analyses of the non-LGBT survey, as compared to those who knew zero LGBT persons, persons who knew more than five had lower negative attitude scores (β =  - 1.3, 95% CI - 2.2, - 0.5), while the score was lower for those that knew one to five (- 0.2), it was not significant (95% CI - 0.8, 0.5). In the LGBT survey, adjusted analyses indicated that there was no significant difference found in discrimination between bisexual, gay, or lesbian participants. However, as compared to cisgender participants, transgender participants had discrimination scores that were 2.1 points higher (95% CI 1.1, 3.0), and gender non-confirming individuals had scores that were one point higher (95% CI 0.2, 1.9). The qualitative findings showcased how societal "othering" occurs in the everyday life of LGBT Rwandans, with large ramifications in creating feelings of isolation and hampering one's capacity to live authentically and with dignity.

Conclusion: The findings from our study indicate a high level of othering of the LGBT community across multiple domains, including housing, employment, healthcare, education, religion, and family within Rwanda.

Policy implications: The findings highlight the importance of social education campaigns about LGBT people, particularly among vital societal role-holders, including healthcare providers and educators. Integrating the rich historical and indigenous culture related to LGBT could be successful in combating anti-West rhetoric.

卢旺达“酷儿”的他人和边缘化:来自LGBT人群的公众认知和生活经历的调查结果。
引言:LGBT人群在全球范围内所经历的多维度的耻辱需要研究来探索工作中的过程。该研究旨在量化“他者”的水平,并探索卢旺达LGBT“他者”的过程。方法:我们对卢旺达的LGBT生活经历进行了连续横断面混合方法研究。我们招募了499名参与者完成lgbt特定调查,1254名参与者完成非lgbt调查。我们对非lgbt参与者进行了16次深度访谈(IDIs)。对于LGBT参与者,我们完成了6个59人的焦点小组,6个深度访谈和3个数字叙事访谈。对于定量调查,我们进行了多变量线性回归,并报告了对LGBT歧视(LGBT调查)和对LGBT态度(非LGBT调查)的贝塔系数和95%置信区间估计。我们采用演绎和归纳的主题和叙事分析方法对定性数据进行分析。结果:在非LGBT调查的调整分析中,与不认识LGBT者相比,认识5人以上的人的负性态度得分较低(β = - 1.3, 95% CI - 2.2, - 0.5),而认识1至5人的人的负性态度得分较低(- 0.2),差异无统计学意义(95% CI - 0.8, 0.5)。在LGBT调查中,经过调整的分析表明,双性恋、男同性恋和女同性恋参与者之间的歧视没有显著差异。然而,与顺性别参与者相比,跨性别参与者的歧视得分高出2.1分(95% CI 1.1, 3.0),性别不确定者的得分高出1分(95% CI 0.2, 1.9)。定性调查结果显示了社会“他者化”在卢旺达LGBT人群的日常生活中是如何发生的,在制造孤立感和阻碍一个人真实而有尊严地生活的能力方面产生了巨大的影响。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在卢旺达,LGBT社区在住房、就业、医疗、教育、宗教和家庭等多个领域的其他性水平很高。政策启示:研究结果强调了关于LGBT人群的社会教育运动的重要性,特别是在重要的社会角色中,包括医疗保健提供者和教育工作者。整合与LGBT相关的丰富历史和本土文化可以成功地对抗反西方言论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Sexuality Research and Social Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Sexuality Research and Social Policy is an international multidisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed state-of-the-art empirical research on sexuality, theoretical and methodological discussions, and the implications of this evidence for policies across the globe regarding sexual health, sexuality education, and sexual rights in diverse communities. The journal also publishes brief research and conference reports; white papers; book, film, and other reviews; together with guest editorials and commentaries. Sexuality Research and Social Policy occasionally publishes special issues on timely topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信