Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Lidocaine for Sustained Postoperative Analgesia in Adults.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kenyon W Osborne, Wiremu S MacFater, Brian J Anderson, Darren Svirskis, Andrew G Hill, Jacqueline A Hannam
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Lidocaine for Sustained Postoperative Analgesia in Adults.","authors":"Kenyon W Osborne, Wiremu S MacFater, Brian J Anderson, Darren Svirskis, Andrew G Hill, Jacqueline A Hannam","doi":"10.1007/s13318-025-00948-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Intraperitoneal lidocaine is an emerging strategy for analgesia following abdominal surgery but its pharmacokinetics are poorly quantified. We aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic model for unbound and total lidocaine by intraperitoneal and intravenous routes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unbound and total lidocaine concentrations, and pain scores (visual analogue score 0-10) were from a published randomized control trial of adults (n = 56) undergoing laparoscopic colon resection. Participants received intravenous or intraperitoneal lidocaine (2 mg/kg bolus then 1.5 mg/kg/h infusion) for 72 h postoperatively. Data were pooled with literature-derived alpha-1-acid glycoprotein concentrations (AAG) to support total lidocaine modelling. Unbound kinetics were described using compartmental models with first order absorption between intraperitoneal and plasma compartments. A turnover model described AAG kinetics with constant binding to lidocaine. An inhibitory pharmacodynamic model was explored to link concentration to pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maximum lidocaine concentrations after intraperitoneal administration were means (range) of 3.0 (0.4-4.5) mg/L total and 0.6 (0.1-0.9) mg/L unbound. Intraperitoneal absorption was incomplete (bioavailability = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-0.76) with a half-time of 0.5 (0.4-0.8) h. A two-compartment model with first order elimination fit best, with unbound clearance 121 (108-136) L/h/70 kg. The binding constant to AAG (K<sub>D</sub>) was 2.98 (2.69-3.35) µmol/L. A pharmacodynamic model with C<sub>50</sub> of 0.21 mg/L and maximal reduction (E<sub>max</sub>) of 6 units captured pain scores and was used to simulate dosing strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A third of the intraperitoneal dose did not reach the central compartment and absorption took ~2 h. Simulations show that 2 mg/kg/h intraperitoneal infusion achieves a 5-point pain score reduction within ~36 min.</p>","PeriodicalId":11939,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-025-00948-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Intraperitoneal lidocaine is an emerging strategy for analgesia following abdominal surgery but its pharmacokinetics are poorly quantified. We aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic model for unbound and total lidocaine by intraperitoneal and intravenous routes.

Methods: Unbound and total lidocaine concentrations, and pain scores (visual analogue score 0-10) were from a published randomized control trial of adults (n = 56) undergoing laparoscopic colon resection. Participants received intravenous or intraperitoneal lidocaine (2 mg/kg bolus then 1.5 mg/kg/h infusion) for 72 h postoperatively. Data were pooled with literature-derived alpha-1-acid glycoprotein concentrations (AAG) to support total lidocaine modelling. Unbound kinetics were described using compartmental models with first order absorption between intraperitoneal and plasma compartments. A turnover model described AAG kinetics with constant binding to lidocaine. An inhibitory pharmacodynamic model was explored to link concentration to pain scores.

Results: Maximum lidocaine concentrations after intraperitoneal administration were means (range) of 3.0 (0.4-4.5) mg/L total and 0.6 (0.1-0.9) mg/L unbound. Intraperitoneal absorption was incomplete (bioavailability = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-0.76) with a half-time of 0.5 (0.4-0.8) h. A two-compartment model with first order elimination fit best, with unbound clearance 121 (108-136) L/h/70 kg. The binding constant to AAG (KD) was 2.98 (2.69-3.35) µmol/L. A pharmacodynamic model with C50 of 0.21 mg/L and maximal reduction (Emax) of 6 units captured pain scores and was used to simulate dosing strategies.

Conclusions: A third of the intraperitoneal dose did not reach the central compartment and absorption took ~2 h. Simulations show that 2 mg/kg/h intraperitoneal infusion achieves a 5-point pain score reduction within ~36 min.

腹腔注射利多卡因用于成人术后持续镇痛的药代动力学。
背景和目的:腹腔注射利多卡因是腹部手术后镇痛的一种新兴策略,但其药代动力学的量化很差。我们的目的是通过腹腔和静脉途径建立未结合利多卡因和总利多卡因的药代动力学模型。方法:未结合和总利多卡因浓度以及疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分0-10)来自已发表的随机对照试验(n = 56)进行腹腔镜结肠切除术的成年人。参与者术后72小时静脉或腹腔注射利多卡因(2 mg/kg丸,然后1.5 mg/kg/h输注)。数据与文献推导的α -1-酸性糖蛋白浓度(AAG)合并,以支持总利多卡因模型。用腹腔和血浆间一级吸收的室室模型来描述非结合动力学。转换模型描述了AAG与利多卡因持续结合的动力学。研究了一种抑制性药效学模型,将浓度与疼痛评分联系起来。结果:腹腔给药后利多卡因的最大浓度平均值(范围)为总浓度3.0 (0.4 ~ 4.5)mg/L,未结合浓度0.6 (0.1 ~ 0.9)mg/L。腹腔内吸收不完全(生物利用度= 0.66,95%可信区间(CI) 0.6-0.76),半衰期为0.5 (0.4-0.8)h。一阶消除的双室模型最适合,未结合清除率为121 (108-136)L/h/70 kg。与AAG结合常数(KD)为2.98(2.69 ~ 3.35)µmol/L。C50为0.21 mg/L, Emax为6个单位的药效学模型捕获疼痛评分,并用于模拟给药策略。结论:三分之一的腹腔注射剂量未到达中央室,吸收时间约为2小时。模拟显示,2 mg/kg/h腹腔注射可在约36分钟内使疼痛评分降低5分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal focuses mainly on new and emerging diagnostic and treatment options, protocols and molecular and cellular basis of disease pathogenesis, new technologies, in liver and biliary sciences. Hepatology International publishes original research articles related to clinical care and basic research; review articles; consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment; invited editorials, and controversies in contemporary issues. The journal does not publish case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信