Benchmark comparison of transcranial ultrasound simulation: Comparing the CIVA Healthcare platform method with existing compressional wave models.

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Robert Andrew Drainville, Sylvain Chatillon, Maxime Lafond, Victor Delattre, Cyril Lafon
{"title":"Benchmark comparison of transcranial ultrasound simulation: Comparing the CIVA Healthcare platform method with existing compressional wave models.","authors":"Robert Andrew Drainville, Sylvain Chatillon, Maxime Lafond, Victor Delattre, Cyril Lafon","doi":"10.1121/10.0036497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational models for acoustic wave propagation play a pivotal role in transcranial ultrasound (TUS) therapy, which is commonly employed for calculating intracranial pressure fields and phase delays to correct for wave distortion during propagation through the skull. Recent collaborative work by Aubry, Bates, Boehm, Butts Pauly, Christensen, Cueto, Gélat, Guasch, Jaros, Jing, Jones, Li, Marty, Montanaro, Neufeld, Pichardo, Pinton, Pulkkinen, Stanziola, Thielscher, Treeby, and van 't Wout [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 152(2), 1003-1019 (2022)] presented a set of numerical benchmarks (BMs) to allow comparisons between various modeling tools and techniques used across the field. In this work, these established BMs are extended to incorporate the CIVA Healthcare simulation platform, which employs a distinct ray-tracing methodology for acoustic wave modeling. The goal of this study is not only to provide a comprehensive benchmarking analysis of the CIVA Heathcare platform within the context of TUS but also to contribute to the ongoing dialogue regarding the intercomparison of different modeling techniques. By doing so, the aim is to enhance the validity and reliability of these computational models for improved applications in TUS therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 4","pages":"3148-3157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational models for acoustic wave propagation play a pivotal role in transcranial ultrasound (TUS) therapy, which is commonly employed for calculating intracranial pressure fields and phase delays to correct for wave distortion during propagation through the skull. Recent collaborative work by Aubry, Bates, Boehm, Butts Pauly, Christensen, Cueto, Gélat, Guasch, Jaros, Jing, Jones, Li, Marty, Montanaro, Neufeld, Pichardo, Pinton, Pulkkinen, Stanziola, Thielscher, Treeby, and van 't Wout [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 152(2), 1003-1019 (2022)] presented a set of numerical benchmarks (BMs) to allow comparisons between various modeling tools and techniques used across the field. In this work, these established BMs are extended to incorporate the CIVA Healthcare simulation platform, which employs a distinct ray-tracing methodology for acoustic wave modeling. The goal of this study is not only to provide a comprehensive benchmarking analysis of the CIVA Heathcare platform within the context of TUS but also to contribute to the ongoing dialogue regarding the intercomparison of different modeling techniques. By doing so, the aim is to enhance the validity and reliability of these computational models for improved applications in TUS therapy.

经颅超声模拟的基准比较:比较CIVA Healthcare平台方法与现有的纵波模型。
声波传播的计算模型在经颅超声(TUS)治疗中起着关键作用,通常用于计算颅内压场和相位延迟,以纠正通过颅骨传播过程中的波畸变。最近由Aubry, Bates, Boehm, Butts Pauly, Christensen, Cueto, gastlaat, Guasch, Jaros, Jing, Jones, Li, Marty, Montanaro, Neufeld, Pichardo, Pinton, Pulkkinen, Stanziola, Thielscher, Treeby和van 't Wout进行的合作研究[J]。Acoust。Soc。Am. 152(2), 1003-1019(2022)]提出了一组数值基准(bm),以便对整个油田使用的各种建模工具和技术进行比较。在这项工作中,这些已建立的脑机模型被扩展为包含CIVA医疗仿真平台,该平台采用独特的射线追踪方法进行声波建模。本研究的目的不仅是在美国的背景下对CIVA医疗保健平台进行全面的基准分析,而且还有助于就不同建模技术的相互比较进行对话。通过这样做,目的是提高这些计算模型的有效性和可靠性,以改进在TUS治疗中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信