Faculty Members' Perception of Factors on Academic Bullying: A Qualitative Study.

Rahmatollah Soltani, Mohammad Hasan Keshavarzi, Ali Asghar Hayat, Seyed Ali Akbar Faghihi, Soolmaz Zare
{"title":"Faculty Members' Perception of Factors on Academic Bullying: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Rahmatollah Soltani, Mohammad Hasan Keshavarzi, Ali Asghar Hayat, Seyed Ali Akbar Faghihi, Soolmaz Zare","doi":"10.30476/jamp.2025.104498.2063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Academic bullying is a global phenomenon in academic settings. Yet, it is complex and frequently overlooked, with insufficient action to address it. Consequently, the existing comprehension of this issue is inadequate for recognizing and preventing bullying behaviors. However, investigations into the determinants of bullying within academia are scarce, demanding further exploration. Thus, this study seeks to investigate the factors contributing to the academic bullying phenomenon among university faculty members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study employed a grounded theory approach. The sample consisted of 20 faculty members affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Purposeful sampling and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using Strauss and Corbin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the grounded theory approach, conditional consequential matrix included a core variable (Academy scientific stagnation), two categories (Job burnout and Erosion of competitive edge), and four subcategories (Personality traits, Discrimination, Autocratic leadership, and unhealthy organizational climate).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights \"Academy scientific stagnation\" due to academic bullying among faculty members. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive strategies targeting both personal behaviors and systemic structures. Interventions should focus on fostering a supportive and inclusive organizational culture, promoting fair leadership practices, and mitigating discriminatory behaviors to break the cycle of academic bullying and scientific stagnation.</p>","PeriodicalId":30645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","volume":"13 2","pages":"123-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2025.104498.2063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Academic bullying is a global phenomenon in academic settings. Yet, it is complex and frequently overlooked, with insufficient action to address it. Consequently, the existing comprehension of this issue is inadequate for recognizing and preventing bullying behaviors. However, investigations into the determinants of bullying within academia are scarce, demanding further exploration. Thus, this study seeks to investigate the factors contributing to the academic bullying phenomenon among university faculty members.

Methods: This qualitative study employed a grounded theory approach. The sample consisted of 20 faculty members affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Purposeful sampling and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using Strauss and Corbin.

Results: From the grounded theory approach, conditional consequential matrix included a core variable (Academy scientific stagnation), two categories (Job burnout and Erosion of competitive edge), and four subcategories (Personality traits, Discrimination, Autocratic leadership, and unhealthy organizational climate).

Conclusions: This study highlights "Academy scientific stagnation" due to academic bullying among faculty members. Addressing this issue requires comprehensive strategies targeting both personal behaviors and systemic structures. Interventions should focus on fostering a supportive and inclusive organizational culture, promoting fair leadership practices, and mitigating discriminatory behaviors to break the cycle of academic bullying and scientific stagnation.

教师对校园霸凌影响因素的知觉:一项质性研究。
学术欺凌是一种全球性的学术现象。然而,这个问题很复杂,经常被忽视,没有采取足够的行动来解决它。因此,对这一问题的现有理解不足以识别和预防欺凌行为。然而,对学术界欺凌决定因素的调查很少,需要进一步探索。因此,本研究旨在探讨造成大学教职员工学业霸凌现象的因素。方法:本定性研究采用扎根理论方法。样本包括隶属于伊朗设拉子设拉子医学大学的20名教员。采用有目的的抽样和半结构化访谈来收集数据。使用Strauss和Corbin分析数据。结果:从扎根理论的角度来看,条件后果矩阵包括一个核心变量(学院科学停滞)、两个类别(工作倦怠和竞争优势侵蚀)和四个子类别(人格特质、歧视、专制领导和不健康的组织氛围)。结论:本研究突出了教师之间的学术欺凌导致的“学院科学停滞”。解决这个问题需要针对个人行为和系统结构的综合战略。干预措施应侧重于培养一种支持性和包容性的组织文化,促进公平的领导实践,减轻歧视行为,以打破学术欺凌和科学停滞的循环。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信