Outcomes of Exclusive 50 W High Power, 5 s Ablation Close to the Esophagus in Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yoshikazu Sato, Shigeki Kusa, Naoyuki Miwa, Satoshi Hara, Tadanori Nakata, Hidenori Hirano, Taiki Ishizawa, Tomohiro Tahara, Tetsuo Sasano, Hitoshi Hachiya
{"title":"Outcomes of Exclusive 50 W High Power, 5 s Ablation Close to the Esophagus in Pulmonary Vein Isolation.","authors":"Yoshikazu Sato, Shigeki Kusa, Naoyuki Miwa, Satoshi Hara, Tadanori Nakata, Hidenori Hirano, Taiki Ishizawa, Tomohiro Tahara, Tetsuo Sasano, Hitoshi Hachiya","doi":"10.1111/jce.16678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) employing a high-power and short-duration (HP-SD) strategy, no consensus exists regarding the optimal settings for radiofrequency application (RFA) to the section of left atrium adjacent to the esophagus (esophageal area, EA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate (1) the efficacy and safety of HP-SD RFA with 50 W for 5 s on the EA, and (2) the predictive factors of esophageal thermal injury (ETI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy on 85 patients who had undergone PVI with 50 W RFA. RFA duration was limited to 5 s on the EA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 85 patients, 16 (18.8%) developed asymptomatic thermal injury (1 mucosal injury, namely erosion and 15 gastric hypomotility). All of those were asymptomatic and transient, and any symptomatic or severe, esophageal or gastric complications was not observed. On the EA, conduction block was achieved after the first encircling in 82 (96.5%) patients. The number of RFA on the EA and the proportion of patients whose EA was located at the posterior wall of the right inferior PV (right-sided EA) were higher in the patients with ETI than without (9.0 [7.0-10.5] vs. 7.0 [5.0-9.0] p = 0.021, and 18.8% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.044, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the number of RFA on the EA (hazard ratio 1.32, p = 0.019) and RFA on the right-sided EA (hazard ratio, 13.50, p = 0.013) were identified as the predictors of ETI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFA of 50 W for 5 s on the EA can be performed with a low incidence of esophageal mucosal injury while maintaining efficacy. RFA on the right-sided EA and the high number of RFA on the EA increase the risk of ETI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16678","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) employing a high-power and short-duration (HP-SD) strategy, no consensus exists regarding the optimal settings for radiofrequency application (RFA) to the section of left atrium adjacent to the esophagus (esophageal area, EA).

Objective: To evaluate (1) the efficacy and safety of HP-SD RFA with 50 W for 5 s on the EA, and (2) the predictive factors of esophageal thermal injury (ETI).

Methods: We performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy on 85 patients who had undergone PVI with 50 W RFA. RFA duration was limited to 5 s on the EA.

Results: Of the 85 patients, 16 (18.8%) developed asymptomatic thermal injury (1 mucosal injury, namely erosion and 15 gastric hypomotility). All of those were asymptomatic and transient, and any symptomatic or severe, esophageal or gastric complications was not observed. On the EA, conduction block was achieved after the first encircling in 82 (96.5%) patients. The number of RFA on the EA and the proportion of patients whose EA was located at the posterior wall of the right inferior PV (right-sided EA) were higher in the patients with ETI than without (9.0 [7.0-10.5] vs. 7.0 [5.0-9.0] p = 0.021, and 18.8% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.044, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the number of RFA on the EA (hazard ratio 1.32, p = 0.019) and RFA on the right-sided EA (hazard ratio, 13.50, p = 0.013) were identified as the predictors of ETI.

Conclusion: RFA of 50 W for 5 s on the EA can be performed with a low incidence of esophageal mucosal injury while maintaining efficacy. RFA on the right-sided EA and the high number of RFA on the EA increase the risk of ETI.

50 W高功率,5 s近食管消融术在肺静脉隔离中的效果。
背景:在采用高功率和短时间(HP-SD)策略的肺静脉隔离(PVI)中,关于射频应用(RFA)到食管附近左心房部分(食管区,EA)的最佳设置尚无共识。目的:评价(1)50 W 5 s HP-SD RFA对食管热损伤(ETI)的疗效和安全性;(2)食管热损伤的预测因素。方法:对85例经PVI手术的患者行食管胃十二指肠镜检查。结果:85例患者中,16例(18.8%)出现无症状热损伤(1例粘膜损伤,即糜烂,15例胃动力低下)。所有病例均为无症状和短暂性,未观察到任何症状性或严重的食管或胃并发症。在EA上,82例(96.5%)患者在第一次围合后实现传导阻滞。ETI患者EA上的RFA数量和EA位于右下PV后壁(右侧EA)的患者比例均高于无ETI患者(9.0 [7.0-10.5]vs. 7.0 [5.0-9.0] p = 0.021, 18.8% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.044)。在多因素分析中,EA上的RFA数(风险比1.32,p = 0.019)和右侧EA上的RFA数(风险比13.50,p = 0.013)被确定为ETI的预测因子。结论:50 W 5 s RFA可在维持疗效的同时,降低食管黏膜损伤发生率。右侧EA的RFA和EA的高数量RFA增加了ETI的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信