Special pedagogy of people with intellectual disability and contemporary psychiatry in poland - mutual complementarity or lack of understanding?

Q3 Medicine
Tadeusz Pietras, Kasper Sipowicz, Andrzej Witusik, Anna Mosiołek, Karol Batko, Aleksander Stefanik
{"title":"Special pedagogy of people with intellectual disability and contemporary psychiatry in poland - mutual complementarity or lack of understanding?","authors":"Tadeusz Pietras, Kasper Sipowicz, Andrzej Witusik, Anna Mosiołek, Karol Batko, Aleksander Stefanik","doi":"10.36740/Merkur202502118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intellectual disability is the subject of interest of psychiatry and special education. Both sciences in Poland adopt an inclusive model of care for people with disabilities. The path of each of them from a directive model to an inclusive model has been different. The aim of the study is to compare the attitude towards people with intellectual disabilities and the evolution of changes that have taken place in Polish special education and in Polish psychiatry in the last few decades. The comparison was carried out using the narrative method through a review of key publications on the understanding of the intellectual disability phenomenon by special education in Poland and by psychiatry. In 1989, Polish special education departed from dialectical materialism as a binding doctrine in the social sciences. A postmodern understanding of the phenomenon of disability, culminating in the formulation of a humanistic paradigm of special education consisting of four microparadigms, developed instead. Special education moved away from quantitative research in favor of qualitative research, negating the biomedical aspects of disability. Qualitative and conceptual research studies carried out in Poland have not entered the global circulation of scientific information and are known locally in Poland. Polish psychiatry has undergone a less revolutionary path of change than special education. The development of community psychiatry in Western Europe slowly began to be implemented in Poland. It has been implemented in recent years in the form of mental health centers. Since the beginning of the political transformation, Polish psychiatry has been present in international journals in published English with the Impact Factor. Despite the postmodern, inclusive understanding of mental disorders, but in contrast to Polish special education, Polish psychiatry is based on quantitative research studies. Their results are published in international journals. Polish special pedagogy of people with intellectual disabilities, as well as Polish psychiatry, have undergone a significant paradigmatic reconstruction in the last few decades. Both sciences adopted an inclusive model of understanding intellectual disability. The different ways of development of the two sciences are reflected in publications and scientific research, as well as in certain terminological differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":39518,"journal":{"name":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","volume":"53 2","pages":"277-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/Merkur202502118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intellectual disability is the subject of interest of psychiatry and special education. Both sciences in Poland adopt an inclusive model of care for people with disabilities. The path of each of them from a directive model to an inclusive model has been different. The aim of the study is to compare the attitude towards people with intellectual disabilities and the evolution of changes that have taken place in Polish special education and in Polish psychiatry in the last few decades. The comparison was carried out using the narrative method through a review of key publications on the understanding of the intellectual disability phenomenon by special education in Poland and by psychiatry. In 1989, Polish special education departed from dialectical materialism as a binding doctrine in the social sciences. A postmodern understanding of the phenomenon of disability, culminating in the formulation of a humanistic paradigm of special education consisting of four microparadigms, developed instead. Special education moved away from quantitative research in favor of qualitative research, negating the biomedical aspects of disability. Qualitative and conceptual research studies carried out in Poland have not entered the global circulation of scientific information and are known locally in Poland. Polish psychiatry has undergone a less revolutionary path of change than special education. The development of community psychiatry in Western Europe slowly began to be implemented in Poland. It has been implemented in recent years in the form of mental health centers. Since the beginning of the political transformation, Polish psychiatry has been present in international journals in published English with the Impact Factor. Despite the postmodern, inclusive understanding of mental disorders, but in contrast to Polish special education, Polish psychiatry is based on quantitative research studies. Their results are published in international journals. Polish special pedagogy of people with intellectual disabilities, as well as Polish psychiatry, have undergone a significant paradigmatic reconstruction in the last few decades. Both sciences adopted an inclusive model of understanding intellectual disability. The different ways of development of the two sciences are reflected in publications and scientific research, as well as in certain terminological differences.

波兰智障人士的特殊教育与当代精神病学——相互补充还是缺乏理解?
智力残疾是精神病学和特殊教育所关注的课题。波兰的这两门科学都采用了包容性的残疾人护理模式。它们从指令模型到包含模型的路径各不相同。这项研究的目的是比较过去几十年来波兰特殊教育和波兰精神病学对智障人士的态度和变化的演变。通过回顾波兰特殊教育和精神病学对智力残疾现象的理解的主要出版物,采用叙述方法进行比较。1989年,波兰特殊教育脱离了作为社会科学约束学说的辩证唯物主义。一种对残疾现象的后现代理解,最终形成了一种由四个微观范式组成的特殊教育人文范式,取而代之。特殊教育从定量研究转向定性研究,否定了残疾的生物医学方面。在波兰进行的定性和概念性研究没有进入全球科学资料流通,在波兰当地为人所知。与特殊教育相比,波兰精神病学经历了一条不那么革命性的变革之路。西欧社区精神病学的发展在波兰慢慢开始实施。近年来以精神卫生中心的形式实施了这一计划。自政治转型开始以来,波兰精神病学已出现在以英文出版的国际期刊上,并具有影响因子。尽管后现代,对精神障碍的包容性理解,但与波兰的特殊教育相比,波兰精神病学是基于定量研究的。他们的研究结果发表在国际期刊上。波兰智障人士的特殊教育学以及波兰精神病学在过去几十年中经历了重大的范式重建。这两门科学都采用了一种包容的模式来理解智力残疾。这两门科学的不同发展方式不仅体现在出版物和科学研究上,还体现在某些术语上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski
Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信