Impact of Intertarget Distances on Single-Isocenter Radiotherapy Plans with jaw-Tracking and jaw-Fixed Techniques for Vertebral Metastases.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1177/15330338251332386
Ling Xu, Huarui Yin, Dewen Zhang, Wentong Qiu, Xianfang Yin, Kai Xie, Xinye Ni
{"title":"Impact of Intertarget Distances on Single-Isocenter Radiotherapy Plans with jaw-Tracking and jaw-Fixed Techniques for Vertebral Metastases.","authors":"Ling Xu, Huarui Yin, Dewen Zhang, Wentong Qiu, Xianfang Yin, Kai Xie, Xinye Ni","doi":"10.1177/15330338251332386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionMultiple targets with varying distances are common in radiotherapy. Reducing treatment time in the plan design helps minimize patient movement and discomfort during the treatment process. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of varying intertarget distances (ITDs) on the dosimetric differences and delivery efficiency of two single-isocenter techniques.MethodsITDs for 15 patients with dual-site vertebral metastases undergoing volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were modified using Matlab 2019a. Distances of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 cm were considered. The VMAT plans were designed with a prescription dose of 40 Gy/20f on Infinity Linac and Monaco 5.40.01. Single-isocenter with jaw tracking (VMAT1) and fixed jaw (VMAT2) were compared in terms of dosimetry and delivery efficiency under different ITDs.ResultsResults showed that both VMAT plans exhibited dosimetric parameters meeting clinical requirements. The conformity index (CI) of VMAT1 plans was smaller than that of VMAT2 at ITD = 4, 6, and 8 cm (P = 0.007, 0.020, and 0.039, respectively), with no significant differences in other planning target volume dosimetry parameters. In terms of delivery efficiency, the treatment time of VMAT1 increased significantly when ITD > 2 cm compared with that at ITD = 2 cm (P = 0.000). Conversely, VMAT2 exhibited no significant change in treatment time at different ITDs (P = 0.073). For ITD = 2 cm, the treatment time of VMAT1 was shorter than that of VMAT2, with a median difference of 77 s. For ITD > 2 cm, the treatment time of VMAT2 was shorter than that of VMAT1, with a median difference ranging from 65 s to 121 s.ConclusionThe experimental results showed that the single-isocenter with jaw tracking is recommended in the planning design when ITDs are less than 2 cm. However, for ITDs greater than 2 cm, the single-isocenter with fixed jaw demonstrates high delivery efficiency.5075.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"24 ","pages":"15330338251332386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338251332386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionMultiple targets with varying distances are common in radiotherapy. Reducing treatment time in the plan design helps minimize patient movement and discomfort during the treatment process. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of varying intertarget distances (ITDs) on the dosimetric differences and delivery efficiency of two single-isocenter techniques.MethodsITDs for 15 patients with dual-site vertebral metastases undergoing volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were modified using Matlab 2019a. Distances of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 cm were considered. The VMAT plans were designed with a prescription dose of 40 Gy/20f on Infinity Linac and Monaco 5.40.01. Single-isocenter with jaw tracking (VMAT1) and fixed jaw (VMAT2) were compared in terms of dosimetry and delivery efficiency under different ITDs.ResultsResults showed that both VMAT plans exhibited dosimetric parameters meeting clinical requirements. The conformity index (CI) of VMAT1 plans was smaller than that of VMAT2 at ITD = 4, 6, and 8 cm (P = 0.007, 0.020, and 0.039, respectively), with no significant differences in other planning target volume dosimetry parameters. In terms of delivery efficiency, the treatment time of VMAT1 increased significantly when ITD > 2 cm compared with that at ITD = 2 cm (P = 0.000). Conversely, VMAT2 exhibited no significant change in treatment time at different ITDs (P = 0.073). For ITD = 2 cm, the treatment time of VMAT1 was shorter than that of VMAT2, with a median difference of 77 s. For ITD > 2 cm, the treatment time of VMAT2 was shorter than that of VMAT1, with a median difference ranging from 65 s to 121 s.ConclusionThe experimental results showed that the single-isocenter with jaw tracking is recommended in the planning design when ITDs are less than 2 cm. However, for ITDs greater than 2 cm, the single-isocenter with fixed jaw demonstrates high delivery efficiency.5075.

靶间距离对采用下颌追踪和下颌固定技术治疗椎体转移的单等中心放疗计划的影响。
不同距离的多个靶点在放射治疗中很常见。在计划设计中减少治疗时间有助于减少患者在治疗过程中的运动和不适。本回顾性研究旨在探讨不同靶间距离(ITDs)对两种单等中心技术的剂量学差异和递送效率的影响。方法使用Matlab 20119a对15例双侧椎体转移瘤行体积调节弧线治疗(VMAT)的患者的sitd进行修改。考虑距离为2、4、6、8和10 cm。VMAT计划的处方剂量为40 Gy/20f,以Infinity Linac和Monaco为5.40.01。比较了不同过渡段下单等中心下颌跟踪(VMAT1)和固定下颌(VMAT2)的剂量学和给药效率。结果两种VMAT方案的剂量学参数均符合临床要求。VMAT1方案在ITD = 4、6、8 cm处的符合性指数(CI)小于VMAT2方案(P分别为0.007、0.020、0.039),其他方案靶体积剂量学参数差异无统计学意义。在输送效率方面,与过渡段为2 cm时相比,过渡段为2 cm时VMAT1的处理时间显著增加(P = 0.000)。相反,VMAT2在不同过渡段的治疗时间没有显著变化(P = 0.073)。当ITD = 2 cm时,VMAT1的治疗时间短于VMAT2,中位差为77 s。对于直径为2 cm的过渡段,VMAT2的处理时间短于VMAT1,中位差为65 ~ 121 s。结论实验结果表明,当过渡段小于2 cm时,建议采用单等心带颌部跟踪的规划设计。然而,对于大于2 cm的过渡段,单等心固定颚的输送效率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信