Exploring the perspectives of new-in-practice specialists about the Health Advocate role: "I didn't even know where to start".

Jacqueline Dorothy Cochrane, Nancy Dudek, Kelsey Crawford, Lindsay Cowley, Kori A LaDonna
{"title":"Exploring the perspectives of new-in-practice specialists about the Health Advocate role: \"I didn't even know where to start\".","authors":"Jacqueline Dorothy Cochrane, Nancy Dudek, Kelsey Crawford, Lindsay Cowley, Kori A LaDonna","doi":"10.36834/cmej.78570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current approaches to health advocate (HA) training leave many physicians feeling ill-equipped to advocate effectively. Likewise, faculty perceive the HA role as challenging to teach, role model, evaluate and assess. Progress on improving HA training is further stalled by debate over the role's importance and whether it should be considered intrinsic to medical practice. Recent graduates are well-positioned to comment on how these challenges affect HA training and preparation for practice. Therefore, our purpose was to explore the perspectives of new-in-practice physicians who are keen to be effective advocates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten early-career physicians participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their perceived competence and motivation to engage in health advocacy. Constructivist grounded theory informed the iterative data collection and analysis process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants wished they knew during training how much they would use advocacy in practice. While training imparted adequate patient-level advocacy skills, participants felt underprepared to enact system-level advocacy-which they conceptualized as a wide-range of activities including political advocacy. In turn, participants grappled with lack of preparation, waning motivation, feelings of futility, lack of value for advocacy and need for self-preservation. For these reasons, they questioned whether system-level advocacy should be expected of all physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although training may adequately prepare physicians for patient-level advocacy, system-level advocacy training remains insufficient. While patient-level advocacy is integral to good care, whether system-level advocacy should be a universal expectation deserves closer consideration. Perhaps system-level health advocacy may be better conceptualized as a specialized role requiring additional training. Regardless, physician advocates' efforts need to be valued for their contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"16 2","pages":"6-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current approaches to health advocate (HA) training leave many physicians feeling ill-equipped to advocate effectively. Likewise, faculty perceive the HA role as challenging to teach, role model, evaluate and assess. Progress on improving HA training is further stalled by debate over the role's importance and whether it should be considered intrinsic to medical practice. Recent graduates are well-positioned to comment on how these challenges affect HA training and preparation for practice. Therefore, our purpose was to explore the perspectives of new-in-practice physicians who are keen to be effective advocates.

Methods: Ten early-career physicians participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their perceived competence and motivation to engage in health advocacy. Constructivist grounded theory informed the iterative data collection and analysis process.

Results: Participants wished they knew during training how much they would use advocacy in practice. While training imparted adequate patient-level advocacy skills, participants felt underprepared to enact system-level advocacy-which they conceptualized as a wide-range of activities including political advocacy. In turn, participants grappled with lack of preparation, waning motivation, feelings of futility, lack of value for advocacy and need for self-preservation. For these reasons, they questioned whether system-level advocacy should be expected of all physicians.

Conclusions: Although training may adequately prepare physicians for patient-level advocacy, system-level advocacy training remains insufficient. While patient-level advocacy is integral to good care, whether system-level advocacy should be a universal expectation deserves closer consideration. Perhaps system-level health advocacy may be better conceptualized as a specialized role requiring additional training. Regardless, physician advocates' efforts need to be valued for their contributions.

探索新执业专家对健康倡导者角色的看法:“我甚至不知道从哪里开始”。
导言:目前的健康倡导者(HA)培训方法使许多医生感觉没有能力有效地进行宣传。同样,教师们认为医管局的角色在教学、树立榜样、评估和评估方面具有挑战性。关于这一角色的重要性以及是否应将其视为医疗实践的内在因素的争论进一步阻碍了改进医管局培训的进展。应届毕业生很有资格就这些挑战如何影响医管局的培训和实践准备发表意见。因此,我们的目的是探索那些热衷于成为有效倡导者的新执业医生的观点。方法:对10名早期职业医生进行半结构化访谈,探讨他们参与健康宣传的感知能力和动机。建构主义理论为迭代的数据收集和分析过程提供了依据。结果:参与者希望在培训期间知道他们在实践中会使用多少倡导。虽然培训传授了足够的患者层面的宣传技能,但与会者感到准备不足,无法制定系统层面的宣传,他们将其定义为包括政治宣传在内的广泛活动。反过来,参与者又面临着缺乏准备、动力减弱、徒劳感、缺乏倡导价值和自我保护的需要等问题。由于这些原因,他们质疑是否应该期望所有医生都进行系统级别的宣传。结论:尽管培训可以使医生为患者层面的宣传做好充分准备,但系统层面的宣传培训仍然不足。虽然患者层面的倡导是良好护理不可或缺的一部分,但系统层面的倡导是否应该成为一种普遍的期望,值得进一步考虑。也许系统一级的卫生宣传可以更好地概念化为需要额外培训的专门作用。无论如何,医生倡导者的努力需要被重视,因为他们的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信