Prescribing direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment: a scoping review of factors that influence primary care providers.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jonathan Hallett, Tina Price, Corie Gray, Shoshana Rosenberg, Roanna Lobo, Gemma Crawford
{"title":"Prescribing direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment: a scoping review of factors that influence primary care providers.","authors":"Jonathan Hallett, Tina Price, Corie Gray, Shoshana Rosenberg, Roanna Lobo, Gemma Crawford","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02865-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis C is a significant public health challenge in Australia, particularly in diagnosis, treatment access, and ongoing care among people who inject drugs. Despite the availability of highly effective direct-acting antivirals and government subsidisation, treatment uptake has declined among this population in recent years, beyond what would be expected from the initial treatment of easier-to-reach patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This rapid scoping review aimed to identify barriers and enablers affecting primary care providers in prescribing direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies were included if they: were published after 2014, focused on DAA treatment, included primary care provider perspectives, contained primary data, identified barriers/enablers to treatment, and were conducted in high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Sources of evidence: </strong>Two databases (Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched for peer-reviewed articles. Primary care stakeholders were consulted through an online survey (n = 10) and telephone interviews (n = 7) to contextualise and validate findings.</p><p><strong>Charting methods: </strong>Data were charted using a standardised form capturing author, year, location, aim, participants, study details, and main findings. Analysis used a deductive approach to identify key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three articles, mostly quantitative studies, were included in the review. The analysis identified four key domains influencing direct-acting antiviral prescription: provider characteristics, healthcare systems and service delivery, models of care, and societal and structural issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides insights into contemporary challenges in hepatitis C care delivery models and highlights critical structural, sociocultural, and interpersonal factors affecting testing and treatment, particularly for people who inject drugs. These findings have implications for improving direct-acting antiviral prescription rates in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02865-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis C is a significant public health challenge in Australia, particularly in diagnosis, treatment access, and ongoing care among people who inject drugs. Despite the availability of highly effective direct-acting antivirals and government subsidisation, treatment uptake has declined among this population in recent years, beyond what would be expected from the initial treatment of easier-to-reach patients.

Objectives: This rapid scoping review aimed to identify barriers and enablers affecting primary care providers in prescribing direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment.

Eligibility criteria: Studies were included if they: were published after 2014, focused on DAA treatment, included primary care provider perspectives, contained primary data, identified barriers/enablers to treatment, and were conducted in high-income countries.

Sources of evidence: Two databases (Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched for peer-reviewed articles. Primary care stakeholders were consulted through an online survey (n = 10) and telephone interviews (n = 7) to contextualise and validate findings.

Charting methods: Data were charted using a standardised form capturing author, year, location, aim, participants, study details, and main findings. Analysis used a deductive approach to identify key themes.

Results: Twenty-three articles, mostly quantitative studies, were included in the review. The analysis identified four key domains influencing direct-acting antiviral prescription: provider characteristics, healthcare systems and service delivery, models of care, and societal and structural issues.

Conclusions: This review provides insights into contemporary challenges in hepatitis C care delivery models and highlights critical structural, sociocultural, and interpersonal factors affecting testing and treatment, particularly for people who inject drugs. These findings have implications for improving direct-acting antiviral prescription rates in primary care settings.

处方直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎:影响初级保健提供者因素的范围审查
背景:丙型肝炎在澳大利亚是一个重大的公共卫生挑战,特别是在注射吸毒者的诊断、治疗和持续护理方面。尽管可以获得高效的直接作用抗病毒药物和政府补贴,但近年来,这一人群的治疗接受程度有所下降,超出了对更容易接触到的患者的初始治疗的预期。目的:这项快速范围审查旨在确定影响初级保健提供者处方直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的障碍和促进因素。入选标准:纳入2014年以后发表的研究,重点是DAA治疗,包括初级保健提供者的观点,包含原始数据,确定了治疗的障碍/促进因素,并在高收入国家进行。证据来源:检索了两个数据库(Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar),以检索同行评议的文章。通过在线调查(n = 10)和电话访谈(n = 7)咨询初级保健利益相关者,以确定背景并验证调查结果。制图方法:数据采用标准化表格绘制,包括作者、年份、地点、目的、参与者、研究细节和主要发现。分析使用演绎的方法来确定关键主题。结果:共纳入23篇文献,以定量研究为主。分析确定了影响直接抗病毒处方的四个关键领域:提供者特征、医疗保健系统和服务提供、护理模式以及社会和结构问题。结论:本综述提供了对丙型肝炎护理提供模式的当代挑战的见解,并强调了影响检测和治疗的关键结构、社会文化和人际因素,特别是对注射吸毒者。这些发现对提高初级保健机构直接作用的抗病毒处方率具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信