Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin by Kidney Function in Atrial Fibrillation: A Binational Population-Based Study.

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-04-09 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000809
Dickson Lam, Anish Scaria, Jason Andrade, Sunil V Badve, Peter Birks, Sarah E Bota, Anna Campain, Ognjenka Djurdjev, Amit X Garg, Ziv Harel, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Carinna Hockham, Matthew T James, Meg J Jardine, Adeera Levin, Eric McArthur, Pietro Ravani, Selena Shao, Manish M Sood, Zhi Tan, Navdeep Tangri, Reid Whitlock, Martin Gallagher, Min Jun, Jeffrey T Ha
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin by Kidney Function in Atrial Fibrillation: A Binational Population-Based Study.","authors":"Dickson Lam, Anish Scaria, Jason Andrade, Sunil V Badve, Peter Birks, Sarah E Bota, Anna Campain, Ognjenka Djurdjev, Amit X Garg, Ziv Harel, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Carinna Hockham, Matthew T James, Meg J Jardine, Adeera Levin, Eric McArthur, Pietro Ravani, Selena Shao, Manish M Sood, Zhi Tan, Navdeep Tangri, Reid Whitlock, Martin Gallagher, Min Jun, Jeffrey T Ha","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence to guide use of apixaban in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in routine clinical practice has been limited. We assessed comparative safety (major bleeding) and effectiveness (ischemic stroke and death) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with AF across the spectrum of non-dialysis-dependent CKD using large, routinely collected data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined findings from 5 retrospective cohorts (2013-2018) across Australia and Canada. Adults with AF, new dispensation of apixaban or warfarin, and a recorded eGFR grouped as ≥60, 45-59, 30-44 and <30mL/min/1.73m2 were included. Patients on dialysis or kidney transplant recipients were excluded. We assessed outcomes within one year of initiating either therapy: (1) composite of all-cause death, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and (2) first hospitalization for major bleeding (intracranial, gastrointestinal or other). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for outcomes across eGFR categories, after 1:1 matching using propensity scores. We summarized center-level data using random effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 38,598 matched apixaban and warfarin users, there were 4130 (10.7%) ischemic and 697 (1.8%) bleeding events within one year. Apixaban was associated with lower or similar risk for the ischemic outcome compared with warfarin in all eGFR categories (pooled HRs [95% CI]: 0.78 [0.64-0.94]), 0.77 [0.62-0.97], 0.82 [0.68-0.98] and 0.99 [0.68-1.45] for eGFR >60, 45-59, 30-44 and <30mL/min/1.73m2 respectively). Apixaban was associated with lower or similar risk of bleeding across the range of kidney function (pooled HRs: 0.55 [0.43-0.69], 0.73 [0.52-1.02], 0.55 [0.31-0.97], 0.68 [0.47-0.99], respectively). There was no significant heterogeneity across jurisdictions or eGFR categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adults with AF and non-dialysis-dependent CKD, apixaban compared with warfarin was associated with lower or similar risk of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. Our results suggest apixaban offers a favorable risk-benefit ratio in patients with AF independent of kidney function.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence to guide use of apixaban in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in routine clinical practice has been limited. We assessed comparative safety (major bleeding) and effectiveness (ischemic stroke and death) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with AF across the spectrum of non-dialysis-dependent CKD using large, routinely collected data.

Methods: We combined findings from 5 retrospective cohorts (2013-2018) across Australia and Canada. Adults with AF, new dispensation of apixaban or warfarin, and a recorded eGFR grouped as ≥60, 45-59, 30-44 and <30mL/min/1.73m2 were included. Patients on dialysis or kidney transplant recipients were excluded. We assessed outcomes within one year of initiating either therapy: (1) composite of all-cause death, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and (2) first hospitalization for major bleeding (intracranial, gastrointestinal or other). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for outcomes across eGFR categories, after 1:1 matching using propensity scores. We summarized center-level data using random effects meta-analysis.

Results: Among 38,598 matched apixaban and warfarin users, there were 4130 (10.7%) ischemic and 697 (1.8%) bleeding events within one year. Apixaban was associated with lower or similar risk for the ischemic outcome compared with warfarin in all eGFR categories (pooled HRs [95% CI]: 0.78 [0.64-0.94]), 0.77 [0.62-0.97], 0.82 [0.68-0.98] and 0.99 [0.68-1.45] for eGFR >60, 45-59, 30-44 and <30mL/min/1.73m2 respectively). Apixaban was associated with lower or similar risk of bleeding across the range of kidney function (pooled HRs: 0.55 [0.43-0.69], 0.73 [0.52-1.02], 0.55 [0.31-0.97], 0.68 [0.47-0.99], respectively). There was no significant heterogeneity across jurisdictions or eGFR categories.

Conclusions: In adults with AF and non-dialysis-dependent CKD, apixaban compared with warfarin was associated with lower or similar risk of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. Our results suggest apixaban offers a favorable risk-benefit ratio in patients with AF independent of kidney function.

阿哌沙班与华法林对房颤肾功能影响的安全性和有效性:一项基于两国人群的研究。
背景:指导心房颤动(AF)和慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者在常规临床实践中使用阿哌沙班的证据有限。我们使用大量常规收集的数据评估了阿哌沙班与华法林在非透析依赖性CKD房颤患者中的安全性(大出血)和有效性(缺血性卒中和死亡)。方法:我们结合了来自澳大利亚和加拿大的5个回顾性队列(2013-2018)的研究结果。成人房事,新配用阿哌沙班或华法林,记录eGFR≥60,45-59,30-44。结果:在38,598名匹配的阿哌沙班和华法林使用者中,一年内有4130例(10.7%)缺血性和697例(1.8%)出血事件。与华法林相比,在所有eGFR类别中,阿哌沙班与缺血性结局的风险更低或相似(eGFR的合并HRs [95% CI]: 0.78[0.64-0.94])、0.77[0.62-0.97]、0.82[0.68-0.98]和0.99[0.68-1.45])。结论:在成人AF和非透析依赖性CKD患者中,阿哌沙班与华法林相比,缺血性和出血结局的风险更低或相似。我们的结果表明阿哌沙班在独立于肾功能的房颤患者中具有良好的风险-收益比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信