Survival Impact of Postoperative Primary Area Radiotherapy on De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1177/15330338251341195
Pingchuan Li, Lineng Wei, Yinan Ji, Huawei Yang
{"title":"Survival Impact of Postoperative Primary Area Radiotherapy on De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Pingchuan Li, Lineng Wei, Yinan Ji, Huawei Yang","doi":"10.1177/15330338251341195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe role of radiotherapy (RT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) patients undergoing surgery remains controversial due to limited evidence. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy on survival outcomes in this population.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 102 dnMBC patients who underwent surgery at a provincial cancer hospital. Patients were grouped based on whether they received postoperative RT. Baseline characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the prognostic impact of postoperative radiotherapy on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsKM survival analysis showed that postoperative RT significantly improved LRFS (HR = 0.3634, 95%CI 0.1552-0.8508, <i>p</i> = .0197) and PFS (HR = 0.4903, 95%CI 0.3061-0.7855, <i>p</i> = .003) but had no significant effect on OS (HR = 0.7337, 95%CI 0.3514-1.508, <i>p</i> = .5395). Multivariate analysis identified postoperative RT as an independent protective factor for LRFS (HR = 0.265, 95%CI 0.088-0.795, <i>p</i> = .018) and PFS (HR = 0.525, 95%CI 0.313-0.882, <i>p</i> = .015). Subgroup analysis showed that for LRFS, RT had no significant interaction with different subgroup classification variables (all interaction <i>p</i> > .05). However, RT had a significant interaction with N stage for PFS (<i>p</i> = .016), specifically in N1-3 patients (HR = 0.384, 95% CI 0.221-0.668).ConclusionRT may improve disease control in selected dnMBC patients undergoing surgery, particularly those with lymph node metastasis. However, these findings still require further validation in larger, multicenter cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"24 ","pages":"15330338251341195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338251341195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe role of radiotherapy (RT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) patients undergoing surgery remains controversial due to limited evidence. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy on survival outcomes in this population.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 102 dnMBC patients who underwent surgery at a provincial cancer hospital. Patients were grouped based on whether they received postoperative RT. Baseline characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the prognostic impact of postoperative radiotherapy on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsKM survival analysis showed that postoperative RT significantly improved LRFS (HR = 0.3634, 95%CI 0.1552-0.8508, p = .0197) and PFS (HR = 0.4903, 95%CI 0.3061-0.7855, p = .003) but had no significant effect on OS (HR = 0.7337, 95%CI 0.3514-1.508, p = .5395). Multivariate analysis identified postoperative RT as an independent protective factor for LRFS (HR = 0.265, 95%CI 0.088-0.795, p = .018) and PFS (HR = 0.525, 95%CI 0.313-0.882, p = .015). Subgroup analysis showed that for LRFS, RT had no significant interaction with different subgroup classification variables (all interaction p > .05). However, RT had a significant interaction with N stage for PFS (p = .016), specifically in N1-3 patients (HR = 0.384, 95% CI 0.221-0.668).ConclusionRT may improve disease control in selected dnMBC patients undergoing surgery, particularly those with lymph node metastasis. However, these findings still require further validation in larger, multicenter cohorts.

术后原发区放疗对新发转移性乳腺癌生存率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
由于证据有限,放疗(RT)在接受手术的新发转移性乳腺癌(dnMBC)患者中的作用仍然存在争议。本研究旨在评估术后放疗对该人群生存结果的影响。材料与方法回顾性分析102例在省级肿瘤医院接受手术治疗的dnMBC患者。患者根据是否接受术后放疗进行分组。基线特征采用卡方检验进行比较。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型评估术后放疗对局部无复发生存期(LRFS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后影响。结果skm生存分析显示,术后放疗显著改善了LRFS (HR = 0.3634, 95%CI 0.1552 ~ 0.8508, p = 0.0197)和PFS (HR = 0.4903, 95%CI 0.3061 ~ 0.7855, p = 0.003),但对OS无显著影响(HR = 0.7337, 95%CI 0.3514 ~ 1.508, p = 0.5395)。多因素分析发现,术后放疗是LRFS (HR = 0.265, 95%CI 0.088-0.795, p = 0.018)和PFS (HR = 0.525, 95%CI 0.313-0.882, p = 0.015)的独立保护因素。亚组分析显示,对于LRFS, RT与不同亚组分类变量无显著交互作用(均交互作用p < 0.05)。然而,RT与PFS的N期有显著的相互作用(p = 0.016),特别是在N1-3患者(HR = 0.384, 95% CI 0.221-0.668)。结论放疗可改善部分手术患者的病情控制,尤其是有淋巴结转移的患者。然而,这些发现仍需要在更大的多中心队列中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信