What Lies Beneath? Using Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) to Identify Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies in Children and Adults: A Literature Review.

POCUS journal Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18072
David McCreary, Bhaskar Sarvesh, Maria Munir
{"title":"What Lies Beneath? Using Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) to Identify Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies in Children and Adults: A Literature Review.","authors":"David McCreary, Bhaskar Sarvesh, Maria Munir","doi":"10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate and appraise the existing evidence on the use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for identifying soft tissue foreign bodies (FBs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the reliability of POCUS in identifying soft tissue FBs. Our primary intention was to review the paediatric-specific evidence base. However, due to a paucity of literature in this area, we also included relevant adult studies and case reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 42 unique articles with relevance to our study objective, of which 3 were paediatric cohort studies and 5 were cohort studies involving paediatric patients. There were two paediatric case series and six individual case reports relating to paediatric patients. The remaining studies either involved adults, did not specify the age of their subjects, or were relevant in-vitro studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS-users regard it as an effective tool for detecting soft tissue FBs. However, the existing evidence base for POCUS use in paediatric patients is limited. Evidence in adults is also relatively lacking compared with other areas of POCUS research, with few large studies evaluating its reliability. This literature review highlights the need for a large prospective paediatric study in order to confirm its effectiveness compared to traditional radiological imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"110-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate and appraise the existing evidence on the use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for identifying soft tissue foreign bodies (FBs).

Methods: We searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the reliability of POCUS in identifying soft tissue FBs. Our primary intention was to review the paediatric-specific evidence base. However, due to a paucity of literature in this area, we also included relevant adult studies and case reports.

Results: We identified a total of 42 unique articles with relevance to our study objective, of which 3 were paediatric cohort studies and 5 were cohort studies involving paediatric patients. There were two paediatric case series and six individual case reports relating to paediatric patients. The remaining studies either involved adults, did not specify the age of their subjects, or were relevant in-vitro studies.

Conclusion: POCUS-users regard it as an effective tool for detecting soft tissue FBs. However, the existing evidence base for POCUS use in paediatric patients is limited. Evidence in adults is also relatively lacking compared with other areas of POCUS research, with few large studies evaluating its reliability. This literature review highlights the need for a large prospective paediatric study in order to confirm its effectiveness compared to traditional radiological imaging.

下面是什么?使用点护理超声(POCUS)识别儿童和成人软组织异物:文献综述。
目的:我们的目的是评估和评价现有证据的使用点超声(POCUS)识别软组织异物(FBs)。方法:我们检索PubMed, Medline, CINAHL和Cochrane数据库,以评估POCUS识别软组织FBs的可靠性的前瞻性和回顾性研究。我们的主要目的是审查儿科特异性证据基础。然而,由于缺乏这方面的文献,我们也纳入了相关的成人研究和病例报告。结果:我们共确定了42篇与我们的研究目标相关的独特文章,其中3篇是儿科队列研究,5篇是涉及儿科患者的队列研究。有两个儿科病例系列和六个与儿科患者有关的个案报告。其余的研究要么涉及成年人,要么没有明确受试者的年龄,要么是相关的体外研究。结论:pocus用户认为它是检测软组织FBs的有效工具。然而,在儿科患者中使用POCUS的现有证据基础有限。与其他POCUS研究领域相比,成人的证据也相对缺乏,很少有大型研究评估其可靠性。这篇文献综述强调需要进行一项大型的前瞻性儿科研究,以证实其与传统放射成像相比的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信