Building a Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Curriculum in Undergraduate Medical Education Through Stepwise Development and Assessment.

POCUS journal Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18116
Nancy L Hagood, Romik Srivastava, Marc E Heincelman, Meghan K Thomas
{"title":"Building a Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Curriculum in Undergraduate Medical Education Through Stepwise Development and Assessment.","authors":"Nancy L Hagood, Romik Srivastava, Marc E Heincelman, Meghan K Thomas","doi":"10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) training is increasingly incorporated in undergraduate medical education (UME). However, limited resources and lack of standard guidelines lead to questions regarding the most effective curriculum and assessment method. The authors aimed to develop a longitudinal UME POCUS curriculum through staged intervention. Year 1, which involved simulation alone, led to improved confidence without adequate knowledge. The authors hypothesized that the addition of resident-led workshops alongside faculty-led lectures would improve POCUS knowledge and confidence among third-year medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study of third-year students on the Internal Medicine (IM) clerkship at a large academic medical center was performed, assessing efficacy of stepwise POCUS curriculum development. Previously implemented year 1 involved comparing the control cohort receiving baseline POCUS education on rounds with the experimental cohort that had access to a high-fidelity POCUS simulator. The year 2 cohort added hands-on resident-led POCUS workshops. The year 3 cohort added faculty-led lectures. All cohorts completed pre- and post-intervention confidence and knowledge-based examinations. The year 1 control cohort served as a control for the current study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 and 102 students completed both pre-/post-tests among year 2 and 3 cohorts, respectively. Both cohorts demonstrated statistically significant improvement in POCUS knowledge and confidence, with greater magnitude of improvement in year 3 with overall knowledge improving from 49.9% to 66.7% on pre- to post-intervention examination (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While simulation alone was insufficient to instill knowledge, the addition of resident-led workshops and faculty-led lectures demonstrated benefits in POCUS knowledge and confidence among medical students and represents a sustainable model of training.</p>","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.18116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) training is increasingly incorporated in undergraduate medical education (UME). However, limited resources and lack of standard guidelines lead to questions regarding the most effective curriculum and assessment method. The authors aimed to develop a longitudinal UME POCUS curriculum through staged intervention. Year 1, which involved simulation alone, led to improved confidence without adequate knowledge. The authors hypothesized that the addition of resident-led workshops alongside faculty-led lectures would improve POCUS knowledge and confidence among third-year medical students.

Methods: A prospective cohort study of third-year students on the Internal Medicine (IM) clerkship at a large academic medical center was performed, assessing efficacy of stepwise POCUS curriculum development. Previously implemented year 1 involved comparing the control cohort receiving baseline POCUS education on rounds with the experimental cohort that had access to a high-fidelity POCUS simulator. The year 2 cohort added hands-on resident-led POCUS workshops. The year 3 cohort added faculty-led lectures. All cohorts completed pre- and post-intervention confidence and knowledge-based examinations. The year 1 control cohort served as a control for the current study.

Results: A total of 69 and 102 students completed both pre-/post-tests among year 2 and 3 cohorts, respectively. Both cohorts demonstrated statistically significant improvement in POCUS knowledge and confidence, with greater magnitude of improvement in year 3 with overall knowledge improving from 49.9% to 66.7% on pre- to post-intervention examination (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: While simulation alone was insufficient to instill knowledge, the addition of resident-led workshops and faculty-led lectures demonstrated benefits in POCUS knowledge and confidence among medical students and represents a sustainable model of training.

通过逐步发展与评估,构建医学本科护理点超声课程。
背景:护理点超声(POCUS)培训越来越多地纳入本科医学教育(UME)。然而,有限的资源和缺乏标准的指导方针导致了关于最有效的课程和评估方法的问题。作者旨在通过分阶段干预开发一个纵向的UME POCUS课程。第一年只涉及模拟,在没有足够知识的情况下提高了信心。作者假设,除了教师主导的讲座外,增加住院医师主导的研讨会将提高三年级医学生对POCUS的认识和信心。方法:对某大型学术医疗中心内科见习三年级学生进行前瞻性队列研究,评估循序渐进的POCUS课程开发效果。先前实施的第一年涉及将接受基线POCUS教育的对照队列与使用高保真POCUS模拟器的实验队列进行比较。第二年的学员增加了由住院医师主导的POCUS实践工作坊。三年级的学生增加了教师主导的讲座。所有队列均完成干预前和干预后的信心和知识基础考试。第1年的对照队列作为本研究的对照。结果:在二年级和三年级的队列中,分别有69名和102名学生完成了前/后测试。两组患者在POCUS知识和信心方面均有统计学意义上的改善,在干预前和干预后的检查中,第3年的改善幅度更大,总体知识从49.9%提高到66.7% (p)。虽然仅靠模拟不足以灌输知识,但增加住院医师主导的讲习班和教师主导的讲座表明,医学学生对POCUS的知识和信心有所提高,这是一种可持续的培训模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信