Comparison Between Septic Arthritis Alone and Coexisting with Other Bone and Joint Infections in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Review.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00200
Nicolas Makoto Favre, Giacomo De Marco, Oscar Vazquez, Amira Chargui, Anne Tabard-Fougère, Blaise Cochard, Christina Steiger, Romain Dayer, Dimitri Ceroni
{"title":"Comparison Between Septic Arthritis Alone and Coexisting with Other Bone and Joint Infections in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Review.","authors":"Nicolas Makoto Favre, Giacomo De Marco, Oscar Vazquez, Amira Chargui, Anne Tabard-Fougère, Blaise Cochard, Christina Steiger, Romain Dayer, Dimitri Ceroni","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear whether coexisting septic arthritis and osteomyelitis (CSAO) differs from septic arthritis (SA) alone in terms of susceptible age groups, clinical and paraclinical presentations, and prevalence. This study aimed to compare patients with isolated SA with those presenting with CSAO, determine the efficacy of different parameters used to distinguish those diagnoses, and investigate the prevalence of CSAO due to <i>Kingella kingae</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study retrospectively included all patients treated for SA over a 17-year period at Geneva University Hospitals. Clinical, biological, and bacteriological data were analyzed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was reviewed for all patients to identify those with coexisting osteomyelitis. Comparisons between patients with isolated SA and those with CSAO were performed using the unpaired Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> for continuous outcomes (reported with median [interquartile range]) and the Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> tests for dichotomous outcomes (reported with n [%]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 247 patients with osteoarticular infections, 177 with SA fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Of these, 124 had SA alone, and 53 (29.9%) had a CSAO. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding sex, age, and clinical and paraclinical results. When coexisting osteomyelitis was present, 51% of cases were acute and 49% were subacute. Bone infection was found in the metaphyses of 21 patients (39.6%), the epiphyses of 11 (20.8%), and was transphyseal in 10 (18.9%). Whatever the infection location, <i>K. kingae</i> was the most common pathogen found in both groups (48% of SA, 43% of CSAO, p = 0.651).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that CSAO is common in children, especially among those younger than 4 years, with an unexpectedly high prevalence of subacute osteomyelitis. This should encourage caregivers to use MRI more extensively in diagnostic processes. Clinical and paraclinical data did not contribute to differentiate CSAO from SA. The widespread presence of <i>K. kingae</i> as a pathogen in both groups supports the advice to systematically use polymerase chain reaction techniques in children younger than 4 years of age.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether coexisting septic arthritis and osteomyelitis (CSAO) differs from septic arthritis (SA) alone in terms of susceptible age groups, clinical and paraclinical presentations, and prevalence. This study aimed to compare patients with isolated SA with those presenting with CSAO, determine the efficacy of different parameters used to distinguish those diagnoses, and investigate the prevalence of CSAO due to Kingella kingae.

Methods: The study retrospectively included all patients treated for SA over a 17-year period at Geneva University Hospitals. Clinical, biological, and bacteriological data were analyzed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was reviewed for all patients to identify those with coexisting osteomyelitis. Comparisons between patients with isolated SA and those with CSAO were performed using the unpaired Mann-Whitney U for continuous outcomes (reported with median [interquartile range]) and the Pearson χ2 tests for dichotomous outcomes (reported with n [%]).

Results: Of 247 patients with osteoarticular infections, 177 with SA fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Of these, 124 had SA alone, and 53 (29.9%) had a CSAO. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding sex, age, and clinical and paraclinical results. When coexisting osteomyelitis was present, 51% of cases were acute and 49% were subacute. Bone infection was found in the metaphyses of 21 patients (39.6%), the epiphyses of 11 (20.8%), and was transphyseal in 10 (18.9%). Whatever the infection location, K. kingae was the most common pathogen found in both groups (48% of SA, 43% of CSAO, p = 0.651).

Conclusions: This study showed that CSAO is common in children, especially among those younger than 4 years, with an unexpectedly high prevalence of subacute osteomyelitis. This should encourage caregivers to use MRI more extensively in diagnostic processes. Clinical and paraclinical data did not contribute to differentiate CSAO from SA. The widespread presence of K. kingae as a pathogen in both groups supports the advice to systematically use polymerase chain reaction techniques in children younger than 4 years of age.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

儿童脓毒性关节炎单独与合并其他骨和关节感染的比较:回顾性回顾。
背景:目前尚不清楚脓毒性关节炎合并骨髓炎(CSAO)与单纯脓毒性关节炎(SA)在易感年龄组、临床和临床外表现以及患病率方面是否存在差异。本研究旨在比较孤立性SA患者与CSAO患者,确定用于区分这些诊断的不同参数的有效性,并调查金氏菌引起的CSAO的患病率。方法:回顾性研究纳入了日内瓦大学医院17年来所有接受SA治疗的患者。对临床、生物学和细菌学资料进行分析。对所有患者进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查,以确定合并骨髓炎的患者。孤立性SA患者与CSAO患者之间的比较使用未配对的Mann-Whitney U进行连续结果(以中位数[四分位数范围]报道)和Pearson χ2检验进行二分类结果(以n[%]报道)。结果:247例骨关节感染患者中,177例SA符合我们的纳入标准。其中124例单纯SA, 53例(29.9%)合并CSAO。两组在性别、年龄、临床及临床旁结果方面无统计学差异。当并发骨髓炎时,51%的病例为急性,49%为亚急性。骨骺感染21例(39.6%),骨骺感染11例(20.8%),骨骺上感染10例(18.9%)。无论感染部位如何,两组中最常见的病原菌均为kingae (SA占48%,CSAO占43%,p = 0.651)。结论:本研究表明,CSAO在儿童中很常见,特别是在4岁以下的儿童中,亚急性骨髓炎的患病率出乎意料地高。这将鼓励护理人员在诊断过程中更广泛地使用MRI。临床和临床资料不能区分CSAO和SA。在这两组中,金氏克雷伯氏菌作为病原体的广泛存在支持了在4岁以下儿童中系统地使用聚合酶链反应技术的建议。证据等级:三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信