{"title":"Sequential comparison of single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with cholecystectomy.","authors":"Jiarui Liu, Xianglong Duan","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02205-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is used to treat gallbladder (GB) stones combined with common bile duct (CBD) stones. Patients with GB stones combined with CBD stones who underwent single-stage LC + LCBDE surgery in our center from January 2020 to November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into LC-BDE and BDE-LC groups. LC-BDE was performed in patients with cystic duct diameter ≥ 0.5 cm, and BDE-LC was performed in patients with cystic duct diameter < 0.5 cm. Baseline data, preoperative conditions, operative details, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative care, and complication rates were compared between patients in the two groups. A total of 240 patients were included, including 72 in the LC-BDE group and 168 in the BDE-LC group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (5 (0, 16) mL vs. 16 (10, 20) mL, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (130.2 (110.0, 168.6) min vs. 125.0 (105.0, 150.0) min, P = 0.112), and postoperative complications such as bile leakage (8.3 vs. 11.9%, P = 0.415). Different operative sequences of cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration in the single-stage surgical treatment of GB stones combined with CBD stones were acceptable in terms of bile duct stone clearance and postoperative complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02205-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is used to treat gallbladder (GB) stones combined with common bile duct (CBD) stones. Patients with GB stones combined with CBD stones who underwent single-stage LC + LCBDE surgery in our center from January 2020 to November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into LC-BDE and BDE-LC groups. LC-BDE was performed in patients with cystic duct diameter ≥ 0.5 cm, and BDE-LC was performed in patients with cystic duct diameter < 0.5 cm. Baseline data, preoperative conditions, operative details, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative care, and complication rates were compared between patients in the two groups. A total of 240 patients were included, including 72 in the LC-BDE group and 168 in the BDE-LC group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss (5 (0, 16) mL vs. 16 (10, 20) mL, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time (130.2 (110.0, 168.6) min vs. 125.0 (105.0, 150.0) min, P = 0.112), and postoperative complications such as bile leakage (8.3 vs. 11.9%, P = 0.415). Different operative sequences of cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration in the single-stage surgical treatment of GB stones combined with CBD stones were acceptable in terms of bile duct stone clearance and postoperative complication rates.
期刊介绍:
Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future.
Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts.
Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.