Capturing factors associated with frailty using routinely collected electronic medical record data in British Columbia, Canada, primary care settings.

IF 1.7
Manpreet Thandi, Morgan Price, Jennifer Baumbusch, Sharde Brown, Sabrina Wong
{"title":"Capturing factors associated with frailty using routinely collected electronic medical record data in British Columbia, Canada, primary care settings.","authors":"Manpreet Thandi, Morgan Price, Jennifer Baumbusch, Sharde Brown, Sabrina Wong","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625000337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic medical record (EMR) systems in primary care present an opportunity to address frailty, a significant health concern for older adults. Researchers in the UK used Read codes to develop a 36-factor electronic frailty index (eFI), which produces frailty scores for patients in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to translate the 36-factor eFI to a Canadian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used manual and automatic mapping to develop a coding set based on standardized terminologies used in Canada to reflect the 36 factors of the eFI. Manual mapping was completed independently by two coders, followed by group consensus among the research team. Automatic mapping was completed using Apelon TermWorks. We then used EMR data from the British Columbia Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. We searched structured data fields related to diagnoses and reasons for patient visits to develop a list of free text terms associated with any of the 36 factors.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>A total of 3768 terms were identified; 3021 were codes. A total of 747 free text terms were identified from 527,521 reviewed data entries. Of the 36 frailty factors, 24 were captured mostly by codes; 7 mostly by free text; and 4 approximately equally by codes and free text. Three key findings emerged from this study: (1) It is difficult to capture frailty using only standardized terminologies currently used in Canada and a combination of standardized codes and free text terms better captures the complexity of frailty; (2) EMRs in primary care can be better optimized; (3) Output from this study allows for the development of a frailty screening algorithm that could be implemented in primary care settings to improve individual and system level outcomes related to frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625000337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electronic medical record (EMR) systems in primary care present an opportunity to address frailty, a significant health concern for older adults. Researchers in the UK used Read codes to develop a 36-factor electronic frailty index (eFI), which produces frailty scores for patients in primary care settings.

Aim: We aimed to translate the 36-factor eFI to a Canadian context.

Methods: We used manual and automatic mapping to develop a coding set based on standardized terminologies used in Canada to reflect the 36 factors of the eFI. Manual mapping was completed independently by two coders, followed by group consensus among the research team. Automatic mapping was completed using Apelon TermWorks. We then used EMR data from the British Columbia Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. We searched structured data fields related to diagnoses and reasons for patient visits to develop a list of free text terms associated with any of the 36 factors.

Results and conclusions: A total of 3768 terms were identified; 3021 were codes. A total of 747 free text terms were identified from 527,521 reviewed data entries. Of the 36 frailty factors, 24 were captured mostly by codes; 7 mostly by free text; and 4 approximately equally by codes and free text. Three key findings emerged from this study: (1) It is difficult to capture frailty using only standardized terminologies currently used in Canada and a combination of standardized codes and free text terms better captures the complexity of frailty; (2) EMRs in primary care can be better optimized; (3) Output from this study allows for the development of a frailty screening algorithm that could be implemented in primary care settings to improve individual and system level outcomes related to frailty.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省初级保健机构常规收集的电子病历数据捕捉与虚弱相关的因素。
背景:初级保健中的电子病历(EMR)系统为解决老年人的一个重要健康问题——虚弱提供了一个机会。英国的研究人员使用Read代码开发了一个36因素的电子虚弱指数(eFI),它为初级保健机构的患者提供虚弱评分。目的:我们的目标是将36因素eFI转化为加拿大的环境。方法:采用手动和自动映射的方法,根据加拿大使用的标准化术语开发编码集,以反映eFI的36个因素。手工映射由两名编码员独立完成,然后在研究团队中进行小组协商。使用Apelon TermWorks完成自动映射。然后我们使用了不列颠哥伦比亚省加拿大初级保健哨点监测网络的电子病历数据。我们搜索了与诊断和患者就诊原因相关的结构化数据字段,以开发与36个因素中的任何一个相关的免费文本术语列表。结果与结论:共鉴定出3768项;3021是代码。从527,521个审查的数据条目中共确定了747个自由文本术语。在36个脆弱因素中,24个主要被编码捕获;7 .主要通过免费文本;代码和自由文本的比例大致相等。本研究得出了三个主要发现:(1)仅使用加拿大目前使用的标准化术语很难捕捉脆弱性,标准化代码和自由文本术语的组合更好地捕捉了脆弱性的复杂性;(2)可以更好地优化初级保健的电子病历;(3)本研究的结果允许开发虚弱筛查算法,该算法可以在初级保健机构中实施,以改善与虚弱相关的个人和系统层面的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信