Legal regulation of AI-assisted academic writing: challenges, frameworks, and pathways.

IF 3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2025.1546064
Runyang Gao, Danghui Yu, Biao Gao, Heng Hua, Zhaoyang Hui, Jingquan Gao, Cha Yin
{"title":"Legal regulation of AI-assisted academic writing: challenges, frameworks, and pathways.","authors":"Runyang Gao, Danghui Yu, Biao Gao, Heng Hua, Zhaoyang Hui, Jingquan Gao, Cha Yin","doi":"10.3389/frai.2025.1546064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The widespread application of artificial intelligence in academic writing has triggered a series of pressing legal challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study systematically examines critical issues, including copyright protection, academic integrity, and comparative research methods. We establishes a risk assessment matrix to quantitatively analyze various risks in AI-assisted academic writing from three dimensions: impact, probability, and mitigation cost, thereby identifying high-risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings reveal that AI-assisted writing challenges fundamental principles of traditional copyright law, with judicial practice tending to position AI as a creative tool while emphasizing human agency. Regarding academic integrity, new risks, such as \"credibility illusion\" and \"implicit plagiarism,\" have become prominent in AI-generated content, necessitating adaptive regulatory mechanisms. Research data protection and personal information security face dual challenges in data security that require technological and institutional innovations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on these findings, we propose a three-dimensional regulatory framework of \"transparency, accountability, technical support\" and present systematic policy recommendations from institutional design, organizational structure, and international cooperation perspectives. The research results deepen understanding of legal attributes of AI creation, promote theoretical innovation in digital era copyright and academic ethics, and provide practical guidance for academic institutions in formulating AI usage policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"1546064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1546064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The widespread application of artificial intelligence in academic writing has triggered a series of pressing legal challenges.

Methods: This study systematically examines critical issues, including copyright protection, academic integrity, and comparative research methods. We establishes a risk assessment matrix to quantitatively analyze various risks in AI-assisted academic writing from three dimensions: impact, probability, and mitigation cost, thereby identifying high-risk factors.

Results: The findings reveal that AI-assisted writing challenges fundamental principles of traditional copyright law, with judicial practice tending to position AI as a creative tool while emphasizing human agency. Regarding academic integrity, new risks, such as "credibility illusion" and "implicit plagiarism," have become prominent in AI-generated content, necessitating adaptive regulatory mechanisms. Research data protection and personal information security face dual challenges in data security that require technological and institutional innovations.

Discussion: Based on these findings, we propose a three-dimensional regulatory framework of "transparency, accountability, technical support" and present systematic policy recommendations from institutional design, organizational structure, and international cooperation perspectives. The research results deepen understanding of legal attributes of AI creation, promote theoretical innovation in digital era copyright and academic ethics, and provide practical guidance for academic institutions in formulating AI usage policies.

人工智能辅助学术写作的法律监管:挑战、框架和途径。
导读:人工智能在学术写作中的广泛应用引发了一系列紧迫的法律挑战。方法:本研究系统检视关键议题,包括版权保护、学术诚信及比较研究方法。我们建立了风险评估矩阵,从影响、概率和缓解成本三个维度定量分析人工智能辅助学术写作中的各种风险,从而识别高风险因素。结果:研究结果表明,人工智能辅助写作挑战了传统版权法的基本原则,司法实践倾向于将人工智能定位为一种创造性工具,同时强调人类的能动性。在学术诚信方面,“可信度错觉”和“隐性抄袭”等新的风险在人工智能生成的内容中变得突出,需要适应性的监管机制。研究数据保护和个人信息安全面临数据安全的双重挑战,需要技术和制度创新。讨论:基于这些发现,我们提出了一个“透明、问责、技术支持”的三维监管框架,并从制度设计、组织结构和国际合作的角度提出了系统的政策建议。研究成果深化了对人工智能创造法律属性的认识,促进了数字时代版权和学术伦理的理论创新,为学术机构制定人工智能使用政策提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信