Does biceps tenodesis screw with forked eyelet decrease the risk of Popeye deformity when compared to traditional closed eyelet screws?

Emrah Caliskan, Kadir Buyukdoğan, Ilker Eren, Olgar Birsel, Lercan Aslan, Mehmet Demirhan
{"title":"Does biceps tenodesis screw with forked eyelet decrease the risk of Popeye deformity when compared to traditional closed eyelet screws?","authors":"Emrah Caliskan, Kadir Buyukdoğan, Ilker Eren, Olgar Birsel, Lercan Aslan, Mehmet Demirhan","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2024.22169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: While many biomechanical studies have compared various biotenodesis materials for biceps tenodesis, there is a lack of research comparing different types of interference screws. This study aimed to compare the impact of a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) forked eyelet tenodesis screw with the traditional PEEK closed eyelet whipstitching technique. The focus was on evaluating the occurrence of Popeye deformity, which is an objective predictor of a successful arthroscopic suprapectoral long head of biceps tenodesis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and biceps tenodesis performed by a single surgeon between January 2010 and 2020 at a single center. The follow-up period was at least 1 year. Exclusion criteria included previous shoulder surgery and osteoarthritis. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of tenodesis anchor used: forked eyelet tenodesis screw versus closed eyelet tenodesis screw. The occurrence of Popeye deformity was compared between the 2 groups. Results: A total of 82 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and biceps tenodesis were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 24.5 ± 4 months. The patients operated on using forked eyelet tenodesis screw were labeled as Group I (n=72) and those with traditional PEEK closed eyelet screw as Group II (n=10). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (Group I: 59.4 ± 5, Group II: 58.4 ± 4, P=.896), gender (both groups predominantly male, P=.886), and body mass index (Group I: 26.7 ± 2, Group II: 27 ± 3; P=.896). The overall rate of popeye deformity in all patients was 8% (n=7). No significant difference in popeye deformity occurrence was observed between the 2 groups (Group I: 6/72 (8.3%), Group II: 1/10 (10%); P=.998). Conclusion: The incidence of Popeye deformity after arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in patients undergoing concomitant rotator cuff repair is low. The choice of fixation anchor, whether a forked eyelet or closed eyelet PEEK anchor, does not significantly influence the occurrence of Popeye deformity. Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"59 2","pages":"73-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2024.22169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While many biomechanical studies have compared various biotenodesis materials for biceps tenodesis, there is a lack of research comparing different types of interference screws. This study aimed to compare the impact of a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) forked eyelet tenodesis screw with the traditional PEEK closed eyelet whipstitching technique. The focus was on evaluating the occurrence of Popeye deformity, which is an objective predictor of a successful arthroscopic suprapectoral long head of biceps tenodesis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and biceps tenodesis performed by a single surgeon between January 2010 and 2020 at a single center. The follow-up period was at least 1 year. Exclusion criteria included previous shoulder surgery and osteoarthritis. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of tenodesis anchor used: forked eyelet tenodesis screw versus closed eyelet tenodesis screw. The occurrence of Popeye deformity was compared between the 2 groups. Results: A total of 82 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and biceps tenodesis were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 24.5 ± 4 months. The patients operated on using forked eyelet tenodesis screw were labeled as Group I (n=72) and those with traditional PEEK closed eyelet screw as Group II (n=10). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age (Group I: 59.4 ± 5, Group II: 58.4 ± 4, P=.896), gender (both groups predominantly male, P=.886), and body mass index (Group I: 26.7 ± 2, Group II: 27 ± 3; P=.896). The overall rate of popeye deformity in all patients was 8% (n=7). No significant difference in popeye deformity occurrence was observed between the 2 groups (Group I: 6/72 (8.3%), Group II: 1/10 (10%); P=.998). Conclusion: The incidence of Popeye deformity after arthroscopic biceps tenodesis in patients undergoing concomitant rotator cuff repair is low. The choice of fixation anchor, whether a forked eyelet or closed eyelet PEEK anchor, does not significantly influence the occurrence of Popeye deformity. Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.

与传统闭孔螺钉相比,叉孔二头肌肌腱固定术螺钉是否能降低大力水手畸形的风险?
目的:虽然许多生物力学研究比较了各种生物肌腱固定材料用于二头肌肌腱固定,但缺乏对不同类型干涉螺钉进行比较的研究。本研究旨在比较聚醚醚酮(PEEK)叉孔固定螺钉与传统聚醚醚酮闭孔短缝技术的影响。重点是评估大力水手畸形的发生,这是关节镜下成功的胸上二头肌肌腱固定术的客观预测指标。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2020年1月在同一中心接受关节镜下肩袖修复和肱二头肌肌腱固定术的患者。随访期至少1年。排除标准包括既往肩部手术和骨关节炎。根据使用的固定锚的类型将患者分为两组:分叉孔固定螺钉和闭合孔固定螺钉。比较两组大力水手畸形的发生情况。结果:共有82例患者接受了关节镜下肩袖修复和二头肌肌腱固定术,平均随访24.5±4个月。采用叉孔螺钉固定的患者为I组(n=72),采用传统PEEK闭式螺钉固定的患者为II组(n=10)。两组患者在年龄(组1:59.4±5,组2:58.4±4,P= 0.896)、性别(两组均为男性,P= 0.886)、体重指数(组1:26.7±2,组2:27±3;P = .896)。所有患者大力眼畸形的总发生率为8% (n=7)。两组之间大力水手畸形发生率无显著差异(ⅰ组:6/72(8.3%),ⅱ组:1/10 (10%);P = .998)。结论:关节镜下二头肌肌腱固定术并发肩袖修复术后大力水手畸形发生率低。固定锚的选择,无论是叉孔还是闭孔PEEK锚,对大力水手畸形的发生没有显著影响。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信