Advancing the Evaluation and Management of CDH1-Associated Gastric Cancer.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Benjamin A Lerner, Samir Gupta, Carol A Burke, Sonia Kupfer, Bryson W Katona, William M Grady, Jewel J Samadder, Matthew B Yurgelun, Kaitlyn J Kelly, Mariana Moreno Prats, Nora Joseph, Gregory E Idos, Benjamin J Swanson, AnnMarie Kieber-Emmons, Jennifer M Weiss, Xavier Llor
{"title":"Advancing the Evaluation and Management of CDH1-Associated Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Benjamin A Lerner, Samir Gupta, Carol A Burke, Sonia Kupfer, Bryson W Katona, William M Grady, Jewel J Samadder, Matthew B Yurgelun, Kaitlyn J Kelly, Mariana Moreno Prats, Nora Joseph, Gregory E Idos, Benjamin J Swanson, AnnMarie Kieber-Emmons, Jennifer M Weiss, Xavier Llor","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.7006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer is a significant global health concern, with CDH1-associated gastric cancer representing a small but important subset of cases. Historically, individuals with CDH1 pathogenic germline variants were advised to undergo prophylactic total gastrectomy due to the high reported risk of gastric cancer and the limited sensitivity of upper endoscopy in detecting signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). However, emerging data suggest that the cumulative lifetime risk of advanced gastric cancer among CDH1 germline pathogenic variant carriers is lower than previously thought, and early-stage SRCC detected on endoscopy does not necessarily indicate imminent-or even eventual-progression to advanced cancer. The near-universal presence of T1a SRCC in gastrectomy specimens from asymptomatic CDH1 pathogenic variant carriers calls into question the reflexive recommendation for gastrectomy, including upon detection of SRCC during surveillance. Furthermore, the morbidity and quality-of-life impact associated with total gastrectomy require careful consideration. Active endoscopic surveillance has shown promise as an alternative management strategy for gastrectomy in patients lacking indicators of >T1a SRCC, though current data are limited by short follow-up periods and selection bias. This review synthesizes recent findings on the natural history of CDH1-associated gastric cancer and evaluates the risks and benefits of gastrectomy versus active endoscopic surveillance, with the goal of helping clinicians provide personalized and evidence-based recommendations for patients with CDH1 pathogenic variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastric cancer is a significant global health concern, with CDH1-associated gastric cancer representing a small but important subset of cases. Historically, individuals with CDH1 pathogenic germline variants were advised to undergo prophylactic total gastrectomy due to the high reported risk of gastric cancer and the limited sensitivity of upper endoscopy in detecting signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). However, emerging data suggest that the cumulative lifetime risk of advanced gastric cancer among CDH1 germline pathogenic variant carriers is lower than previously thought, and early-stage SRCC detected on endoscopy does not necessarily indicate imminent-or even eventual-progression to advanced cancer. The near-universal presence of T1a SRCC in gastrectomy specimens from asymptomatic CDH1 pathogenic variant carriers calls into question the reflexive recommendation for gastrectomy, including upon detection of SRCC during surveillance. Furthermore, the morbidity and quality-of-life impact associated with total gastrectomy require careful consideration. Active endoscopic surveillance has shown promise as an alternative management strategy for gastrectomy in patients lacking indicators of >T1a SRCC, though current data are limited by short follow-up periods and selection bias. This review synthesizes recent findings on the natural history of CDH1-associated gastric cancer and evaluates the risks and benefits of gastrectomy versus active endoscopic surveillance, with the goal of helping clinicians provide personalized and evidence-based recommendations for patients with CDH1 pathogenic variants.

推进cdh1相关性胃癌的评价与治疗。
胃癌是一个重要的全球健康问题,与cdh1相关的胃癌代表了一小部分但重要的病例。历史上,由于报道的胃癌高风险和上内镜检测印戒细胞癌(SRCC)的敏感性有限,CDH1致病性种系变异的个体被建议进行预防性全胃切除术。然而,新出现的数据表明,CDH1种系致病变异携带者发生晚期胃癌的累积终生风险比以前认为的要低,并且内窥镜检测到的早期SRCC并不一定表明即将甚至最终进展为晚期癌症。在无症状的CDH1致病变异携带者的胃切除术标本中,几乎普遍存在T1a SRCC,这使人们对胃切除术的反射性推荐提出了质疑,包括在监测期间检测到SRCC。此外,与全胃切除术相关的发病率和生活质量影响需要仔细考虑。尽管目前的数据受限于随访时间短和选择偏倚,但主动内镜监测作为缺乏>T1a SRCC指标的胃切除术患者的另一种管理策略已经显示出前景。本综述综合了关于CDH1相关胃癌的自然史的最新发现,并评估了胃切除术与主动内镜监测的风险和益处,目的是帮助临床医生为CDH1致病变异患者提供个性化和循证的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信