Retroperitoneal single port vs. transperitoneal multiport robot assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with highly hostile abdomen: comparative analysis from a tertiary care center.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini, Ruben S Calvo, Juan R Torres Anguiano, Donato Cannoletta, Greta Pettenuzzo, Fabrizio DI Maida, Francesca Valastro, Andrea Mari, Gabriele Bignante, Francesco Lasorsa, Hakan B Haberal, Alessandro Zucchi, Andrea Minervini, Simone Crivellaro
{"title":"Retroperitoneal single port vs. transperitoneal multiport robot assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with highly hostile abdomen: comparative analysis from a tertiary care center.","authors":"Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini, Ruben S Calvo, Juan R Torres Anguiano, Donato Cannoletta, Greta Pettenuzzo, Fabrizio DI Maida, Francesca Valastro, Andrea Mari, Gabriele Bignante, Francesco Lasorsa, Hakan B Haberal, Alessandro Zucchi, Andrea Minervini, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06245-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore perioperative and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with highly hostile abdomens treated with retroperitoneal (RP) single port vs transperitoneal multiport robot assisted partial nephrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and surgical data of all consecutive patients treated with transperitoneal multiport and RP single-port robot assisted partial nephrectomy between March 2019 and January 2024 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The presence of \"hostile abdomen\" was defined as personal history of at least one major abdominal surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of Trifecta achievement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, clinical and surgical data of 247 consecutive patients were prospectively collected, of these 71 met the inclusions criteria and were retrospectively analyzed. No differences emerged in baseline features. Previous surgery proximity to the site of partial nephrectomy was found comparable among groups (P=0.21). RP single port group showed a significantly lower operative time (171 vs. 235 min, P=0.02) and estimated blood loss (70 vs. 100 cc, P=0.04) while open conversion was significantly higher (9.3%) in case of multiport treatment (P=0.001). A significative lower rate of major postoperative complications (7.1% vs. 16.3%, P=0.03) as well as 90-days readmissions (P=0.04) was found in case of single port RP procedures. Adjusting for age, BMI and CCI, RP single port approach was confirmed as independent predictor of Trifecta achievement (OR 1.62 CI 1.18-2.35 P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients treated with RAPN with highly hostile abdomens, the adoption of a single port RP approach reduces the major complication rate as compared to the multiport transperitoneal approach also improving EBL, operative time, LOS and pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 2","pages":"209-216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06245-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to explore perioperative and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with highly hostile abdomens treated with retroperitoneal (RP) single port vs transperitoneal multiport robot assisted partial nephrectomy.

Methods: Clinical and surgical data of all consecutive patients treated with transperitoneal multiport and RP single-port robot assisted partial nephrectomy between March 2019 and January 2024 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The presence of "hostile abdomen" was defined as personal history of at least one major abdominal surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of Trifecta achievement.

Results: Overall, clinical and surgical data of 247 consecutive patients were prospectively collected, of these 71 met the inclusions criteria and were retrospectively analyzed. No differences emerged in baseline features. Previous surgery proximity to the site of partial nephrectomy was found comparable among groups (P=0.21). RP single port group showed a significantly lower operative time (171 vs. 235 min, P=0.02) and estimated blood loss (70 vs. 100 cc, P=0.04) while open conversion was significantly higher (9.3%) in case of multiport treatment (P=0.001). A significative lower rate of major postoperative complications (7.1% vs. 16.3%, P=0.03) as well as 90-days readmissions (P=0.04) was found in case of single port RP procedures. Adjusting for age, BMI and CCI, RP single port approach was confirmed as independent predictor of Trifecta achievement (OR 1.62 CI 1.18-2.35 P=0.01).

Conclusions: In patients treated with RAPN with highly hostile abdomens, the adoption of a single port RP approach reduces the major complication rate as compared to the multiport transperitoneal approach also improving EBL, operative time, LOS and pain management.

腹膜后单孔与经腹膜多孔机器人辅助高度敌对腹部患者部分肾切除术:来自三级保健中心的比较分析。
背景:本研究的目的是探讨采用后腹膜(RP)单孔与经腹膜多孔机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗高度敌对腹部患者的围手术期和功能结局。方法:前瞻性收集2019年3月至2024年1月连续使用经腹膜多口和RP单口机器人辅助肾部分切除术患者的临床和手术资料,并进行回顾性分析。“敌对腹部”的存在定义为至少有一次腹部大手术的个人病史。采用多变量logistic回归分析评估三连片效果的独立预测因素。结果:总体而言,前瞻性收集了247例连续患者的临床和手术资料,其中71例符合纳入标准,并进行回顾性分析。基线特征无差异。既往手术邻近部分肾切除术部位组间具有可比性(P=0.21)。RP单端口组的手术时间(171 vs. 235 min, P=0.02)和估计失血量(70 vs. 100 cc, P=0.04)显著较低,而多端口组的开放转换率显著较高(9.3%)(P=0.001)。单端口RP手术的主要术后并发症发生率(7.1% vs. 16.3%, P=0.03)和90天再入院率(P=0.04)明显较低。调整年龄、BMI和CCI后,RP单端口方法被证实是三连片疗效的独立预测因子(OR 1.62 CI 1.18-2.35 P=0.01)。结论:在腹部高度敌对的RAPN患者中,与多口经腹腔入路相比,采用单孔RP入路可减少主要并发症发生率,并改善EBL、手术时间、LOS和疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信