Independent Evaluation of a Commercial AI Software for Incidental Findings of Pulmonary Embolism (IPE) on a Large Hospital Retrospective Dataset.

IF 2.2 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/rrp/9091895
S Ambrogio, I Verdon, B Laureano, K V Ramnarine, F Fedele, D Vilic, I Honey, E Barton, C Goncalves, Sze Mun Mak, H Shuaib, A Jacques
{"title":"Independent Evaluation of a Commercial AI Software for Incidental Findings of Pulmonary Embolism (IPE) on a Large Hospital Retrospective Dataset.","authors":"S Ambrogio, I Verdon, B Laureano, K V Ramnarine, F Fedele, D Vilic, I Honey, E Barton, C Goncalves, Sze Mun Mak, H Shuaib, A Jacques","doi":"10.1155/rrp/9091895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Early treatment of pulmonary embolism is associated with better outcomes, yet incidental PE (IPE) is frequently missed. This retrospective study aims to provide an independent assessment an artificial intelligence (AI) software, developed for flagging IPEs on CT scans. <b>Methods:</b> The study included consecutive CT examinations of 5042 unique patients (8 scanners and 3 protocols) acquired at a large NHS Trust between 01 January 2022 and 30 September 2022. Two radiologists blindly and independently reviewed the AI \"positive\" and a random selection of \"negative\" cases to establish the reference standard (<i>n</i> = 200). Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third radiologist. The clinical reports of the 200 cases were reviewed for comparison. Performance metrics for the software were calculated for the full (<i>n</i> = 5042) and reviewed (<i>n</i> = 200) cohorts separately. <b>Results:</b> Based on the reference standard, the IPE prevalence was 1.6% (81/5041). Across the reviewed cohort, the algorithm detected PE with a sensitivity of 96.4%, a specificity of 89.7%, a PPV of 87.1%, an NPV of 97.2%, and an accuracy of 92.5%. Across the full cohort, the algorithm exhibited a sensitivity of 96.4%, a specificity of 99.8%, a PPV of 87.1%, an NPV of 99.9%, and an accuracy of 99.7%. A review of the original clinical reports indicated that 11 cases of IPE were initially unreported. A total of 34 examinations were rejected by the software. While the scanner performed consistently across patient sexes and ethnicities, discrepancies were found among CT scanners. <b>Conclusions:</b> The AI software detected IPE with a high diagnostic accuracy on a large NHS dataset, showing that AI-supported reporting could improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce times to diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9091895"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/rrp/9091895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early treatment of pulmonary embolism is associated with better outcomes, yet incidental PE (IPE) is frequently missed. This retrospective study aims to provide an independent assessment an artificial intelligence (AI) software, developed for flagging IPEs on CT scans. Methods: The study included consecutive CT examinations of 5042 unique patients (8 scanners and 3 protocols) acquired at a large NHS Trust between 01 January 2022 and 30 September 2022. Two radiologists blindly and independently reviewed the AI "positive" and a random selection of "negative" cases to establish the reference standard (n = 200). Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third radiologist. The clinical reports of the 200 cases were reviewed for comparison. Performance metrics for the software were calculated for the full (n = 5042) and reviewed (n = 200) cohorts separately. Results: Based on the reference standard, the IPE prevalence was 1.6% (81/5041). Across the reviewed cohort, the algorithm detected PE with a sensitivity of 96.4%, a specificity of 89.7%, a PPV of 87.1%, an NPV of 97.2%, and an accuracy of 92.5%. Across the full cohort, the algorithm exhibited a sensitivity of 96.4%, a specificity of 99.8%, a PPV of 87.1%, an NPV of 99.9%, and an accuracy of 99.7%. A review of the original clinical reports indicated that 11 cases of IPE were initially unreported. A total of 34 examinations were rejected by the software. While the scanner performed consistently across patient sexes and ethnicities, discrepancies were found among CT scanners. Conclusions: The AI software detected IPE with a high diagnostic accuracy on a large NHS dataset, showing that AI-supported reporting could improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce times to diagnosis.

在大型医院回顾性数据集上对肺栓塞(IPE)偶然发现的商业人工智能软件进行独立评估。
背景:肺栓塞的早期治疗与更好的预后相关,但偶发性PE (IPE)经常被遗漏。本回顾性研究旨在对人工智能(AI)软件进行独立评估,该软件用于在CT扫描中标记IPEs。方法:该研究包括在2022年1月1日至2022年9月30日期间在一家大型NHS信托机构获得的5042例独特患者(8台扫描仪和3种方案)的连续CT检查。两名放射科医生盲目独立地审查了人工智能“阳性”病例和随机选择的“阴性”病例,以建立参考标准(n = 200)。差异由第三位放射科医生裁决。对200例病例的临床报告进行复习比较。分别计算完整队列(n = 5042)和回顾队列(n = 200)的软件性能指标。结果:参照标准,IPE患病率为1.6%(81/5041)。在回顾的队列中,该算法检测PE的灵敏度为96.4%,特异性为89.7%,PPV为87.1%,NPV为97.2%,准确率为92.5%。在整个队列中,该算法的灵敏度为96.4%,特异性为99.8%,PPV为87.1%,NPV为99.9%,准确率为99.7%。对原始临床报告的回顾表明,11例IPE最初未被报道。软件共拒绝了34次检查。虽然扫描仪在不同性别和种族的患者中表现一致,但在CT扫描仪中发现了差异。结论:AI软件在大型NHS数据集上检测到IPE具有较高的诊断准确性,表明AI支持的报告可以提高诊断准确性并减少诊断时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology Research and Practice
Radiology Research and Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信