Benjamin A. Steinberg, Richard Holubkov, T. Jared Bunch, Thomas F. Deering, Christopher A. Groh, Robert Kennedy, Marco Perez, Jonathan P. Piccini, Parash Pokharel, Salvatore J. Savona, Nishant Verma, Kevin Watt, Suneet Mittal
{"title":"Sotalol Dosing and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Intravenous Loading for Atrial Arrhythmias—A PEAKS Registry Substudy","authors":"Benjamin A. Steinberg, Richard Holubkov, T. Jared Bunch, Thomas F. Deering, Christopher A. Groh, Robert Kennedy, Marco Perez, Jonathan P. Piccini, Parash Pokharel, Salvatore J. Savona, Nishant Verma, Kevin Watt, Suneet Mittal","doi":"10.1111/jce.16677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sotalol is used for the maintenance of sinus rhythm among patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is discretion regarding dosing of chronic therapy, and the target oral dose dictates infusion doses for intravenous sotalol loading. To date, use and outcomes by dose are not well-described.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In the Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry, we analyzed outcomes among patients undergoing elective IV sotalol load for atrial arrhythmias (AT/AF). Baseline characteristics, changes in ECG parameters, in-hospital adverse events, and arrhythmia outcomes were compared based on target oral dose (80 mg vs. 120 mg).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 163 total patients, 85 (52%) of patients underwent loading anticipating target oral dose of 80 mg, compared with 78 (48%) for 120 mg. Those targeting 80 mg were older (median age 70 vs. 66, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with similar proportion female (24% vs. 21%, <i>p</i> = 0.71), and without significant differences in comorbidities or renal function. Patients targeted for 80 mg were less frequently kept in-hospital for 2 oral doses after intravenous infusion (45% vs. 89%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of sinus rhythm or adverse events during loading.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Selection of target oral sotalol dose (120 vs. 80 mg) does not appear to be driven by patient characteristics, and may represent an opportunity for improved treatment. In-hospital adverse events are low overall without differences between dose.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Clinicaltrials. gov # NCT05247320.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 6","pages":"1352-1358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jce.16677","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16677","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Sotalol is used for the maintenance of sinus rhythm among patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is discretion regarding dosing of chronic therapy, and the target oral dose dictates infusion doses for intravenous sotalol loading. To date, use and outcomes by dose are not well-described.
Methods
In the Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry, we analyzed outcomes among patients undergoing elective IV sotalol load for atrial arrhythmias (AT/AF). Baseline characteristics, changes in ECG parameters, in-hospital adverse events, and arrhythmia outcomes were compared based on target oral dose (80 mg vs. 120 mg).
Results
Among 163 total patients, 85 (52%) of patients underwent loading anticipating target oral dose of 80 mg, compared with 78 (48%) for 120 mg. Those targeting 80 mg were older (median age 70 vs. 66, p < 0.001), with similar proportion female (24% vs. 21%, p = 0.71), and without significant differences in comorbidities or renal function. Patients targeted for 80 mg were less frequently kept in-hospital for 2 oral doses after intravenous infusion (45% vs. 89%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of sinus rhythm or adverse events during loading.
Conclusions
Selection of target oral sotalol dose (120 vs. 80 mg) does not appear to be driven by patient characteristics, and may represent an opportunity for improved treatment. In-hospital adverse events are low overall without differences between dose.
背景:索他洛尔用于房颤患者窦性心律的维持。然而,对于慢性治疗的剂量有一定的酌情权,目标口服剂量决定静脉注射索他洛尔负荷的剂量。迄今为止,按剂量划分的使用和结果没有得到很好的描述。方法:在前瞻性评价分析和静脉索他洛尔动力学(PEAKS)登记中,我们分析了选择性静脉索他洛尔负荷治疗心房心律失常(AT/AF)患者的结果。基线特征、心电图参数的变化、住院不良事件和心律失常结果基于口服目标剂量(80mg vs 120mg)进行比较。结果:在163例患者中,85例(52%)患者接受了负荷预期目标口服剂量80 mg,而78例(48%)患者接受了120 mg。以80 mg为靶点的患者年龄较大(中位年龄70 vs 66, p)。结论:口服索他洛尔靶点剂量(120 vs 80 mg)的选择似乎不受患者特征的驱动,可能代表着改善治疗的机会。院内不良事件总体上较低,剂量间无差异。试验注册:临床试验。NCT05247320。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.