{"title":"The role of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in predicting survival and rehospitalization after surgical aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Michele D'Alonzo, Baudo Massimo, Antonio Fiore, Jacopo Capussela, Gianluca Abrami, Thierry Folliguet, Claudio Muneretto","doi":"10.1007/s12055-024-01891-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), calculated using serum albumin levels and blood lymphocyte count, reflects a patient's nutritional and immune status. It is commonly used as a prognostic tool following oncological surgery and in certain cardiovascular conditions. This study aims to assess whether the PNI can also serve as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 471 low-risk patients with EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) of ≤4%, who underwent isolated SAVR, were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups based on their PNI values (cut-off, 46.75). Outcomes such as length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, 1-year survival, and rehospitalization rates were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Low PNI group consisted of 116 patients, while the High PNI group included 355 patients. The latter were younger, but both groups had comparable comorbidities. All patients underwent SAVR with a bioprosthesis. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups (Low PNI, 2.6% vs. High PNI, 0.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.162). However, the 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in the Low PNI group (Low PNI, 5.2 ± 4.1% vs. High PNI, 1.7 ± 1.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.039). Additionally, the 1-year rehospitalization rate was significantly higher in the Low PNI group (Low PNI, 13.8 ± 6.3% vs. High PNI, 7.7 ± 2.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.040). Multivariate analysis identified PNI as a protective factor, while mechanical ventilation was associated with increased risk of death or rehospitalization at 1-year after SAVR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PNI is an inexpensive, accessible, and reliable tool that can be easily integrated into existing risk stratification scores for SAVR.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-024-01891-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":13285,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"532-540"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-024-01891-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), calculated using serum albumin levels and blood lymphocyte count, reflects a patient's nutritional and immune status. It is commonly used as a prognostic tool following oncological surgery and in certain cardiovascular conditions. This study aims to assess whether the PNI can also serve as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Methods: A total of 471 low-risk patients with EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) of ≤4%, who underwent isolated SAVR, were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups based on their PNI values (cut-off, 46.75). Outcomes such as length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, 1-year survival, and rehospitalization rates were compared between the groups.
Results: The Low PNI group consisted of 116 patients, while the High PNI group included 355 patients. The latter were younger, but both groups had comparable comorbidities. All patients underwent SAVR with a bioprosthesis. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups (Low PNI, 2.6% vs. High PNI, 0.9%, p = 0.162). However, the 1-year survival rate was significantly lower in the Low PNI group (Low PNI, 5.2 ± 4.1% vs. High PNI, 1.7 ± 1.3%, p = 0.039). Additionally, the 1-year rehospitalization rate was significantly higher in the Low PNI group (Low PNI, 13.8 ± 6.3% vs. High PNI, 7.7 ± 2.7%, p = 0.040). Multivariate analysis identified PNI as a protective factor, while mechanical ventilation was associated with increased risk of death or rehospitalization at 1-year after SAVR.
Conclusions: The PNI is an inexpensive, accessible, and reliable tool that can be easily integrated into existing risk stratification scores for SAVR.
Graphical abstract:
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-024-01891-7.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is education. The journal aims to dissipate current clinical practices and developments in the area of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. This includes information on cardiovascular epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, clinical manifestation etc. The journal accepts manuscripts from cardiovascular anaesthesia, cardiothoracic and vascular nursing and technology development and new/innovative products.The journal is the official publication of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons which has a membership of over 1000 at present.DescriptionThe journal is the official organ of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons. It was started in 1982 by Dr. Solomon Victor and ws being published twice a year up to 1996. From 2000 the editorial office moved to Delhi. From 2001 the journal was extended to quarterly and subsequently four issues annually have been printed out at time and regularly without fail. The journal receives manuscripts from members and non-members and cardiovascular surgeons. The manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two or sometimes three or four reviewers who are on the panel. The manuscript process is now completely online. Funding the journal comes partially from the organization and from revenue generated by subscription and advertisement.