Yoslien Sopamena, Raden Sutiawan, Marlies J Visser, Dadun Dadun, Rita Damayanti, Dien Anshari, Lawrence Yang, Ruth M H Peters, Marjolein B M Zweekhorst
{"title":"What matters most in Cirebon, Indonesia: cultural nuances to health-related stigma.","authors":"Yoslien Sopamena, Raden Sutiawan, Marlies J Visser, Dadun Dadun, Rita Damayanti, Dien Anshari, Lawrence Yang, Ruth M H Peters, Marjolein B M Zweekhorst","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2497918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with stigmatised health conditions face adverse attitudes, social exclusion and discrimination, stemming from preconceived notions about the condition and its associated symptoms or links to disability. Culture plays a role in shaping stigma manifestations. By employing the 'what matters most' framework, this study sought to capture perspectives of men and women living with leprosy, lymphatic filariasis or depressive disorder, and of their families and healthcare providers, regarding key cultural capabilities that 'matter most' for men and women in Cirebon Regency, Indonesia. A total of 91 respondents participated in 45 interviews and 10 focus group discussions. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis and the analysis generated three core cultural themes defined as 'what matters most' in Cirebon Regency: personal responsibilities, marriage and family responsibilities, and community responsibilities. Specifically, recovery-oriented attitudes, family support and community engagement were identified as key cultural engagements that could help people with stigmatised conditions to maintain personhood and mitigate health-related stigma. In conclusion, our findings highlight it is important to consider these cultural capabilities in stigma research, particularly in the design of stigma assessment and stigma-reduction interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2497918"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2497918","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Individuals with stigmatised health conditions face adverse attitudes, social exclusion and discrimination, stemming from preconceived notions about the condition and its associated symptoms or links to disability. Culture plays a role in shaping stigma manifestations. By employing the 'what matters most' framework, this study sought to capture perspectives of men and women living with leprosy, lymphatic filariasis or depressive disorder, and of their families and healthcare providers, regarding key cultural capabilities that 'matter most' for men and women in Cirebon Regency, Indonesia. A total of 91 respondents participated in 45 interviews and 10 focus group discussions. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis and the analysis generated three core cultural themes defined as 'what matters most' in Cirebon Regency: personal responsibilities, marriage and family responsibilities, and community responsibilities. Specifically, recovery-oriented attitudes, family support and community engagement were identified as key cultural engagements that could help people with stigmatised conditions to maintain personhood and mitigate health-related stigma. In conclusion, our findings highlight it is important to consider these cultural capabilities in stigma research, particularly in the design of stigma assessment and stigma-reduction interventions.
期刊介绍:
Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.