{"title":"Multimedia contamination characteristics, risk assessment, and source quantification of phthalates in the Shaying River Basin, China.","authors":"Minghui Hao, Qiting Zuo, Xinna Zhao, Shujuan Shi, Junfeng Wu, Hongbin Gao, Yizhen Lu","doi":"10.1007/s10653-025-02518-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phthalates (PAEs), a class of typical endocrine-disrupting chemicals, have been widely detected in the environment due to their prevalent use as plasticizers in plastic products. This study investigates the multimedia contamination characteristics and potential ecological risks of PAEs in water, soil, and sediments of the Shaying River (SYR) Basin. A Geodetector model (GDM) was employed to identify the key drivers influencing the spatial distribution of PAEs, while factor analysis and the Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model were utilized to quantitatively apportion the potential sources of PAEs. Results revealed that the concentrations and spatial variation of PAEs were significantly higher in soil and sediments than in water, with distinct compositional profiles. Water samples exhibited a higher proportion of low-molecular-weight PAEs compared to soil and sediment, where high-molecular-weight PAEs prevailed to a lesser extent. Notably, among the 6 target PAEs, di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) were uniformly the primary PAEs in water, soil, and sediment of the SYR Basin, posing higher ecological risks to algae, crustaceans, amphibians, and fish compared to the other 4 PAEs. The spatial distribution of PAEs in the SYR Basin was comprehensively influenced by land use, precipitation, human activities, and soil types. Key factors vary across media, but the interaction between popdensity and other variables significantly enhanced the interpretation degree, jointly shaping the PAEs distribution patterns. Primary sources of PAEs in the basin were sewage and wastewater discharges (37.0%), nonpoint industrial sources (36.4%), and domestic sources (25.6%).</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"47 6","pages":"202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02518-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phthalates (PAEs), a class of typical endocrine-disrupting chemicals, have been widely detected in the environment due to their prevalent use as plasticizers in plastic products. This study investigates the multimedia contamination characteristics and potential ecological risks of PAEs in water, soil, and sediments of the Shaying River (SYR) Basin. A Geodetector model (GDM) was employed to identify the key drivers influencing the spatial distribution of PAEs, while factor analysis and the Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model were utilized to quantitatively apportion the potential sources of PAEs. Results revealed that the concentrations and spatial variation of PAEs were significantly higher in soil and sediments than in water, with distinct compositional profiles. Water samples exhibited a higher proportion of low-molecular-weight PAEs compared to soil and sediment, where high-molecular-weight PAEs prevailed to a lesser extent. Notably, among the 6 target PAEs, di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) were uniformly the primary PAEs in water, soil, and sediment of the SYR Basin, posing higher ecological risks to algae, crustaceans, amphibians, and fish compared to the other 4 PAEs. The spatial distribution of PAEs in the SYR Basin was comprehensively influenced by land use, precipitation, human activities, and soil types. Key factors vary across media, but the interaction between popdensity and other variables significantly enhanced the interpretation degree, jointly shaping the PAEs distribution patterns. Primary sources of PAEs in the basin were sewage and wastewater discharges (37.0%), nonpoint industrial sources (36.4%), and domestic sources (25.6%).
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.