The Novel "Hot Dog" Technique for Reconstruction of Incudostapedial Discontinuity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
İsa Kaya, Fetih Furkan Şahin, Tanrıverdi O Hasan, Tayfun Kirazlı
{"title":"The Novel \"Hot Dog\" Technique for Reconstruction of Incudostapedial Discontinuity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"İsa Kaya, Fetih Furkan Şahin, Tanrıverdi O Hasan, Tayfun Kirazlı","doi":"10.1177/00034894251328682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic otitis media can cause ossicular chain discontinuity (OCD), especially erosion of long process of incus. This study introduces a novel \"Hot Dog\" technique for OCD reconstruction that combines glass ionomer cement (GIC) with autogenous cartilage dust and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to address these limitations. The aim is to evaluate the auditory and anatomical outcomes of the \"Hot Dog\" technique compared to GIC alone, and to describe the \"Hot Dog\" reconstruction method in detail.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the \"Hot Dog\" technique to GIC alone for incudostapedial rebridging. Thirty-eight adult patients were included and randomized (18 patients in both study and control groups). Preoperative and postoperative pure-tone audiometry were performed. Air-bone gap (ABG) and ABG gain were measured at least 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups achieved significant postoperative ABG closure (mean gain: 22.8 dB in \"Hot Dog\" vs 19 dB in GIC), with no statistically significant difference. A success rate of 100% (postoperative ABG ≤ 20 dB) was observed in both groups at a minimum 12-month follow-up. No complications were observed in the \"Hot Dog\" group, while 1 patient in the GIC group developed a postoperative tympanic membrane perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"Hot Dog\" technique demonstrated promise for incudostapedial rebridging, achieving significant hearing improvement and a favorable complication profile compared to GIC alone. While a trend toward better hearing was observed, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and definitively compare its efficacy to established techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 1b.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"518-526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251328682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic otitis media can cause ossicular chain discontinuity (OCD), especially erosion of long process of incus. This study introduces a novel "Hot Dog" technique for OCD reconstruction that combines glass ionomer cement (GIC) with autogenous cartilage dust and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to address these limitations. The aim is to evaluate the auditory and anatomical outcomes of the "Hot Dog" technique compared to GIC alone, and to describe the "Hot Dog" reconstruction method in detail.

Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the "Hot Dog" technique to GIC alone for incudostapedial rebridging. Thirty-eight adult patients were included and randomized (18 patients in both study and control groups). Preoperative and postoperative pure-tone audiometry were performed. Air-bone gap (ABG) and ABG gain were measured at least 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative complications were assessed.

Results: Both groups achieved significant postoperative ABG closure (mean gain: 22.8 dB in "Hot Dog" vs 19 dB in GIC), with no statistically significant difference. A success rate of 100% (postoperative ABG ≤ 20 dB) was observed in both groups at a minimum 12-month follow-up. No complications were observed in the "Hot Dog" group, while 1 patient in the GIC group developed a postoperative tympanic membrane perforation.

Conclusion: The "Hot Dog" technique demonstrated promise for incudostapedial rebridging, achieving significant hearing improvement and a favorable complication profile compared to GIC alone. While a trend toward better hearing was observed, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and definitively compare its efficacy to established techniques.

Level of evidence: Level 1b.

新颖的“热狗”技术重建镫骨不连续性:一项随机对照试验。
目的:慢性中耳炎可引起听骨链断裂(OCD),尤其是长牙突糜烂。本研究介绍了一种用于强迫症重建的新型“热狗”技术,该技术将玻璃离聚体水泥(GIC)与自体软骨粉尘和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)相结合,以解决这些局限性。目的是评估“热狗”技术与单独GIC相比的听觉和解剖学结果,并详细描述“热狗”重建方法。方法:这项前瞻性、随机对照试验比较了“热狗”技术与单纯使用GIC治疗镫骨再桥的效果。38名成年患者被纳入并随机分配(研究组和对照组各18名患者)。术前、术后进行纯音测听。术后至少12个月测量气骨间隙(ABG)和ABG增加。评估术后并发症。结果:两组术后ABG均明显闭合(“Hot Dog”组平均增益22.8 dB, GIC组平均增益19 dB),差异无统计学意义。在至少12个月的随访中,两组的手术成功率均为100%(术后ABG≤20 dB)。“Hot Dog”组无并发症发生,GIC组有1例患者术后出现鼓膜穿孔。结论:与单纯的GIC相比,“热狗”技术有望实现包括镫骨再桥,实现显着的听力改善和有利的并发症。虽然观察到听力改善的趋势,但需要更大的研究和更长的随访时间来证实这些发现,并明确地将其效果与现有技术进行比较。证据等级:1b级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信