Pain Assessment Tools for Infants, Children, and Adolescents With Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mika Hirata, Noyuri Yamaji, Shotaro Iwamoto, Ayaka Hasegawa, Mitsuru Miyachi, Takashi Yamaguchi, Daisuke Hasegawa, Erika Ota, Nobuyuki Yotani
{"title":"Pain Assessment Tools for Infants, Children, and Adolescents With Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review.","authors":"Mika Hirata, Noyuri Yamaji, Shotaro Iwamoto, Ayaka Hasegawa, Mitsuru Miyachi, Takashi Yamaguchi, Daisuke Hasegawa, Erika Ota, Nobuyuki Yotani","doi":"10.2196/66614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management in children with cancer may be inadequate due to poor pain assessment, and evaluation using suitable tools is necessary. Despite the availability of many pain assessment scales, few studies have summarized the existing assessment tools, making it challenging to select a suitable scale.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map existing pain assessment tools for children with cancer and provide a comprehensive overview of pediatric cancer-related pain screening and assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scoping review will be conducted according to the guidelines by the Joanna Briggs Institute and reported following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) framework. Electronic databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ICHUSHI (Japan Medical Abstracts Society), and Embase, will be searched to identify eligible studies, without date or language restrictions. We defined the eligibility criteria based on the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) format. Studies that focused on assessment tools for evaluating pain in children (aged 0-18 years) with cancer in a hospital or at home will be included. Although there are no restrictions on study design, protocols and conference abstracts will be excluded. Two or more reviewers will select studies by reviewing the full text of relevant articles identified by titles and abstracts, and disagreements will be resolved through discussion. Two or more reviewers will extract predefined data items, including characteristics of included studies (eg, author name, title of publication, year of publication, purpose of study, study setting, study population, outline of the assessment tool, study design, and findings) and the characteristics of assessment tools (eg, types of tools, target population, assessor, validity, instructions, precautions, and advantages and disadvantages of the tools). Pain assessment tools will be summarized in tabular format and described in a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through electronic database searches on November 20, 2023, we identified 3748 articles. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of pain assessment tools. The final report is planned for submission to a peer-reviewed journal in 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review is the first comprehensive effort to map existing tools on pediatric cancer-related pain assessment tools for infants, children, and adolescents aged <18 years, according to developmental stages. Based on the findings of this study, we will discuss future clinical and research implications for pain assessment and management in children with cancer. The findings are expected to enhance pain management practices in children with cancer and inform health care providers, policy makers, and other stakeholders.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/66614.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e66614"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/66614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain management in children with cancer may be inadequate due to poor pain assessment, and evaluation using suitable tools is necessary. Despite the availability of many pain assessment scales, few studies have summarized the existing assessment tools, making it challenging to select a suitable scale.

Objective: This scoping review aims to map existing pain assessment tools for children with cancer and provide a comprehensive overview of pediatric cancer-related pain screening and assessment tools.

Methods: The scoping review will be conducted according to the guidelines by the Joanna Briggs Institute and reported following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) framework. Electronic databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ICHUSHI (Japan Medical Abstracts Society), and Embase, will be searched to identify eligible studies, without date or language restrictions. We defined the eligibility criteria based on the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) format. Studies that focused on assessment tools for evaluating pain in children (aged 0-18 years) with cancer in a hospital or at home will be included. Although there are no restrictions on study design, protocols and conference abstracts will be excluded. Two or more reviewers will select studies by reviewing the full text of relevant articles identified by titles and abstracts, and disagreements will be resolved through discussion. Two or more reviewers will extract predefined data items, including characteristics of included studies (eg, author name, title of publication, year of publication, purpose of study, study setting, study population, outline of the assessment tool, study design, and findings) and the characteristics of assessment tools (eg, types of tools, target population, assessor, validity, instructions, precautions, and advantages and disadvantages of the tools). Pain assessment tools will be summarized in tabular format and described in a narrative synthesis.

Results: Through electronic database searches on November 20, 2023, we identified 3748 articles. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of pain assessment tools. The final report is planned for submission to a peer-reviewed journal in 2025.

Conclusions: This scoping review is the first comprehensive effort to map existing tools on pediatric cancer-related pain assessment tools for infants, children, and adolescents aged <18 years, according to developmental stages. Based on the findings of this study, we will discuss future clinical and research implications for pain assessment and management in children with cancer. The findings are expected to enhance pain management practices in children with cancer and inform health care providers, policy makers, and other stakeholders.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/66614.

婴儿、儿童和青少年癌症患者的疼痛评估工具:范围审查方案。
背景:由于疼痛评估不佳,癌症儿童的疼痛管理可能不充分,使用合适的工具进行评估是必要的。尽管有许多疼痛评估量表,但很少有研究对现有的评估工具进行总结,这使得选择合适的量表具有挑战性。目的:本综述旨在绘制现有的儿童癌症疼痛评估工具,并提供儿童癌症相关疼痛筛查和评估工具的全面概述。方法:范围评价将按照Joanna Briggs研究所的指南进行,并按照PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和范围评价扩展元分析首选报告项目)框架进行报告。检索电子数据库,包括PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ICHUSHI(日本医学文摘学会)和Embase,以确定符合条件的研究,没有日期或语言限制。我们根据PCC(人口、概念和上下文)格式定义了资格标准。将包括在医院或家中评估癌症儿童(0-18岁)疼痛评估工具的研究。虽然对研究设计没有限制,但协议和会议摘要将被排除在外。两名或两名以上审稿人将通过阅读相关文章的全文和摘要来选择研究,并通过讨论来解决分歧。两名或两名以上的审稿人将提取预定义的数据项,包括纳入研究的特征(如作者姓名、发表标题、发表年份、研究目的、研究环境、研究人群、评估工具概述、研究设计和结果)和评估工具的特征(如工具类型、目标人群、评估者、有效性、说明、注意事项和工具的优缺点)。疼痛评估工具将以表格形式进行总结,并以叙事综合形式进行描述。结果:通过2023年11月20日的电子数据库检索,共检索到3748篇文章。本综述将提供疼痛评估工具的全面概述。最终报告计划于2025年提交给同行评议期刊。结论:这项范围综述是第一次全面地绘制现有的用于婴儿、儿童和青少年的儿童癌症相关疼痛评估工具的工具,国际注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/66614。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信