Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized-controlled trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Seyed Ehsan Hashemi, Haydar Gök, Seçilay Güneş, Can Ateş, Şehim Kutlay
{"title":"Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized-controlled trial.","authors":"Seyed Ehsan Hashemi, Haydar Gök, Seçilay Güneş, Can Ateş, Şehim Kutlay","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2024.14486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of combined pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment and physical therapy on pain, stiffness, and functional limitation in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this double-blind, randomized-controlled study, a total of 70 female patients with primary knee OA (mean age: 59.74±9.82 years; range, 40 to 80 years) were randomly allocated into PEMF and sham groups between March 2014 and July 2015. Both groups received 15 sessions of physical therapy over three weeks. Additionally, the PEMF group received PEMF treatment for 30 min/day, while the control group received sham PEMF. The patients were assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scale before and three and seven weeks after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regardless of the group, all patients' pain levels were significantly improved in both scales at three and seven weeks after treatment (p<0.001). The PEMF group had significantly less pain than the sham group based on the VAS score (p=0.003). The PEMF group had significantly lower functional limitation and stiffness at seven weeks (p=0.008). Recovery ratios based on the PGA score were significantly higher in the PEMF group both at three and seven weeks (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with knee OA who receive PEMF therapy in addition to physical therapy have more pain reduction and physical improvement. Based on these findings, PEMF is a safe and well-tolerated treatment of choice in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"71 1","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2024.14486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of combined pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment and physical therapy on pain, stiffness, and functional limitation in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Patients and methods: In this double-blind, randomized-controlled study, a total of 70 female patients with primary knee OA (mean age: 59.74±9.82 years; range, 40 to 80 years) were randomly allocated into PEMF and sham groups between March 2014 and July 2015. Both groups received 15 sessions of physical therapy over three weeks. Additionally, the PEMF group received PEMF treatment for 30 min/day, while the control group received sham PEMF. The patients were assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scale before and three and seven weeks after treatment.

Results: Regardless of the group, all patients' pain levels were significantly improved in both scales at three and seven weeks after treatment (p<0.001). The PEMF group had significantly less pain than the sham group based on the VAS score (p=0.003). The PEMF group had significantly lower functional limitation and stiffness at seven weeks (p=0.008). Recovery ratios based on the PGA score were significantly higher in the PEMF group both at three and seven weeks (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Patients with knee OA who receive PEMF therapy in addition to physical therapy have more pain reduction and physical improvement. Based on these findings, PEMF is a safe and well-tolerated treatment of choice in this patient population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脉冲电磁场治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在评价脉冲电磁场(PEMF)联合物理治疗对膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)患者疼痛、僵硬和功能限制的疗效。患者和方法:在这项双盲、随机对照研究中,共有70例女性原发性膝关节OA患者(平均年龄:59.74±9.82岁;在2014年3月至2015年7月期间,年龄在40至80岁之间)随机分为PEMF组和sham组。两组都在三周内接受了15次物理治疗。此外,PEMF组接受30分钟/天的PEMF治疗,而对照组接受假PEMF治疗。患者在治疗前、治疗后3周和7周分别采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)和医生整体评估量表(PGA)进行评估。结果:无论哪一组,在治疗后3周和7周,所有患者的疼痛水平在两个量表上都有显著改善(p结论:在物理治疗的基础上接受PEMF治疗的膝关节OA患者疼痛减轻和身体改善更多。基于这些发现,PEMF是一种安全且耐受性良好的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信