A scoping review of randomised controlled trials in vascular access devices in emergency departments.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hui Grace Xu, Yang Camila Zhao, Jed Duff, Nicole Marsh
{"title":"A scoping review of randomised controlled trials in vascular access devices in emergency departments.","authors":"Hui Grace Xu, Yang Camila Zhao, Jed Duff, Nicole Marsh","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To synthesise findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on vascular access devices (VADs) in emergency departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>VADs play a critical role in EDs, enabling rapid delivery of supportive therapies to address urgent medical needs. This scoping review will map current evidence and determine areas to focus future research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, a comprehensive search was conducted (2012-2024) across four databases. RCTs that focused on peripheral intravenous catheters, central venous catheters, arterial catheters, or intraosseous catheters in an ED setting were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 RCTs were included, a majority focused on peripheral intravenous catheters (n = 41, 85 %), followed by central venous catheters (n = 4, 8 %), arterial catheters (n = 2, 4 %), and intraosseous catheters (n = 1, 3 %). The findings were categorised by intervention type, including vessel visualisation technology, catheter design, dressing and securement design, distraction techniques, topical anaesthetics, inserter models, and other related techniques. The top three most frequently reported outcomes were insertion success (n = 21), time to successful insertion (n = 20), and catheter-related complications (n = 19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides ED clinicians with current evidence on VAD technologies and techniques, enabling them to select and implement the most effective options into daily practice reduce costs and improve patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To synthesise findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on vascular access devices (VADs) in emergency departments (EDs).

Background: VADs play a critical role in EDs, enabling rapid delivery of supportive therapies to address urgent medical needs. This scoping review will map current evidence and determine areas to focus future research priorities.

Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, a comprehensive search was conducted (2012-2024) across four databases. RCTs that focused on peripheral intravenous catheters, central venous catheters, arterial catheters, or intraosseous catheters in an ED setting were included.

Results: 48 RCTs were included, a majority focused on peripheral intravenous catheters (n = 41, 85 %), followed by central venous catheters (n = 4, 8 %), arterial catheters (n = 2, 4 %), and intraosseous catheters (n = 1, 3 %). The findings were categorised by intervention type, including vessel visualisation technology, catheter design, dressing and securement design, distraction techniques, topical anaesthetics, inserter models, and other related techniques. The top three most frequently reported outcomes were insertion success (n = 21), time to successful insertion (n = 20), and catheter-related complications (n = 19).

Conclusion: This review provides ED clinicians with current evidence on VAD technologies and techniques, enabling them to select and implement the most effective options into daily practice reduce costs and improve patient satisfaction.

急诊科血管通路装置随机对照试验的范围综述
目的:综合急诊(ed)血管通路装置(VADs)的随机对照试验(RCTs)的研究结果。背景:VADs在急诊科中发挥着关键作用,能够快速提供支持性治疗以满足紧急医疗需求。这一范围审查将绘制当前证据图,并确定未来研究重点的领域。方法:遵循Arksey和O'Malley的范围审查框架,在四个数据库中进行了全面的检索(2012-2024)。包括在ED环境中使用外周静脉导管、中心静脉导管、动脉导管或骨内导管的随机对照试验。结果:48相关的包括,大多数集中在周边静脉导管(n = 41岁,85年 %),紧随其后的是中央静脉导管(n = 4,8 %),动脉导管(n = 2,4 %),和intraosseous导管(n = 1,3 %)。研究结果按干预类型进行分类,包括血管可视化技术、导管设计、敷料和安全设计、牵引技术、局部麻醉、插入器模型和其他相关技术。最常见的三个结果是插入成功(n = 21)、成功插入时间(n = 20)和导管相关并发症(n = 19)。结论:本综述为急诊科临床医生提供了VAD技术和技术的最新证据,使他们能够在日常实践中选择和实施最有效的方案,降低成本,提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信