Hui Grace Xu, Yang Camila Zhao, Jed Duff, Nicole Marsh
{"title":"A scoping review of randomised controlled trials in vascular access devices in emergency departments.","authors":"Hui Grace Xu, Yang Camila Zhao, Jed Duff, Nicole Marsh","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To synthesise findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on vascular access devices (VADs) in emergency departments (EDs).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>VADs play a critical role in EDs, enabling rapid delivery of supportive therapies to address urgent medical needs. This scoping review will map current evidence and determine areas to focus future research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, a comprehensive search was conducted (2012-2024) across four databases. RCTs that focused on peripheral intravenous catheters, central venous catheters, arterial catheters, or intraosseous catheters in an ED setting were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 RCTs were included, a majority focused on peripheral intravenous catheters (n = 41, 85 %), followed by central venous catheters (n = 4, 8 %), arterial catheters (n = 2, 4 %), and intraosseous catheters (n = 1, 3 %). The findings were categorised by intervention type, including vessel visualisation technology, catheter design, dressing and securement design, distraction techniques, topical anaesthetics, inserter models, and other related techniques. The top three most frequently reported outcomes were insertion success (n = 21), time to successful insertion (n = 20), and catheter-related complications (n = 19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides ED clinicians with current evidence on VAD technologies and techniques, enabling them to select and implement the most effective options into daily practice reduce costs and improve patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.03.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To synthesise findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on vascular access devices (VADs) in emergency departments (EDs).
Background: VADs play a critical role in EDs, enabling rapid delivery of supportive therapies to address urgent medical needs. This scoping review will map current evidence and determine areas to focus future research priorities.
Methods: Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, a comprehensive search was conducted (2012-2024) across four databases. RCTs that focused on peripheral intravenous catheters, central venous catheters, arterial catheters, or intraosseous catheters in an ED setting were included.
Results: 48 RCTs were included, a majority focused on peripheral intravenous catheters (n = 41, 85 %), followed by central venous catheters (n = 4, 8 %), arterial catheters (n = 2, 4 %), and intraosseous catheters (n = 1, 3 %). The findings were categorised by intervention type, including vessel visualisation technology, catheter design, dressing and securement design, distraction techniques, topical anaesthetics, inserter models, and other related techniques. The top three most frequently reported outcomes were insertion success (n = 21), time to successful insertion (n = 20), and catheter-related complications (n = 19).
Conclusion: This review provides ED clinicians with current evidence on VAD technologies and techniques, enabling them to select and implement the most effective options into daily practice reduce costs and improve patient satisfaction.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.