Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Echocardiographic Image-Analysis for the Diagnosis of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Echocardiographic Image-Analysis for the Diagnosis of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yaduan Gan, Lin Yang, Jianmei Liao","doi":"10.31083/RCM28060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the precision of artificial intelligence (AI) in aiding the diagnostic process of congenital heart disease (CHD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical studies published in English up to March 2024. Studies using AI-assisted ultrasound for diagnosing CHD were included. To evaluate the quality of the studies included in the analysis, the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 scale was employed. The overall accuracy of AI-assisted imaging in the diagnosis of CHD was determined using Stata15.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on region and model architecture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis encompassed a total of 7 studies, yielding 19 datasets. The combined sensitivity was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.96), and the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96). The positive likelihood ratio was calculated as 13.0 (95% CI: 7.7-21.9), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04-0.13). The diagnostic odds ratio was 171 (95% CI: 62-472). The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99). Subgroup analysis found that the ResNet and DenNet architecture models had better diagnostic performance than other models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI demonstrates considerable value in aiding the diagnostic process of CHD. However, further prospective studies are required to establish its utility in real-world clinical practice.</p><p><strong>The prospero registration: </strong>CRD42024540525, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=540525.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"28060"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM28060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To assess the precision of artificial intelligence (AI) in aiding the diagnostic process of congenital heart disease (CHD).
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical studies published in English up to March 2024. Studies using AI-assisted ultrasound for diagnosing CHD were included. To evaluate the quality of the studies included in the analysis, the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 scale was employed. The overall accuracy of AI-assisted imaging in the diagnosis of CHD was determined using Stata15.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on region and model architecture.
Results: The analysis encompassed a total of 7 studies, yielding 19 datasets. The combined sensitivity was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.96), and the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96). The positive likelihood ratio was calculated as 13.0 (95% CI: 7.7-21.9), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04-0.13). The diagnostic odds ratio was 171 (95% CI: 62-472). The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99). Subgroup analysis found that the ResNet and DenNet architecture models had better diagnostic performance than other models.
Conclusions: AI demonstrates considerable value in aiding the diagnostic process of CHD. However, further prospective studies are required to establish its utility in real-world clinical practice.
The prospero registration: CRD42024540525, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=540525.
期刊介绍：
RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
