Sensitivity and Specificity of Cognitive Health Screening in a Coordinated Specialty Care Setting.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Alice M Saperstein, Cale N Basaraba, Melanie M Wall, Lisa B Dixon, Ilana Nossel, Iruma Bello, Alice Medalia
{"title":"Sensitivity and Specificity of Cognitive Health Screening in a Coordinated Specialty Care Setting.","authors":"Alice M Saperstein, Cale N Basaraba, Melanie M Wall, Lisa B Dixon, Ilana Nossel, Iruma Bello, Alice Medalia","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive health should be addressed as part of routine clinical care for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, including those with early psychosis. Providers need an efficient workflow that includes screening tools with adequate sensitivity and specificity to facilitate appropriate cognitive symptom management. This study aimed to examine the utility of a cognitive health screening protocol by analyzing data from 102 participants in OnTrackNY, a specialized network of programs for people experiencing early psychosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Screening elicited participants' perceptions of the usefulness of better memory, attention, and critical thinking skills and aimed to detect the presence of cognitive difficulties via participant and clinician reports. The screening protocol's sensitivity and specificity for detecting cognitive impairment, as defined by scores on a brief cognitive assessment, were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half the sample had global cognitive impairment, whereas more than 90% demonstrated impairment in at least one cognitive domain. Screening items demonstrated high sensitivity to detect global (≥0.80) and specific cognitive impairment (≥0.74), such that individuals with objectively measured cognitive impairment were likely to be correctly identified, although specificity remained low (≤0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The screening protocol may best be considered as a means to initiate shared decision making for next steps, which may include brief cognitive assessment or more resource-intensive evaluation, and to inform appropriate treatment recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"appips20240524"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive health should be addressed as part of routine clinical care for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, including those with early psychosis. Providers need an efficient workflow that includes screening tools with adequate sensitivity and specificity to facilitate appropriate cognitive symptom management. This study aimed to examine the utility of a cognitive health screening protocol by analyzing data from 102 participants in OnTrackNY, a specialized network of programs for people experiencing early psychosis.

Methods: Screening elicited participants' perceptions of the usefulness of better memory, attention, and critical thinking skills and aimed to detect the presence of cognitive difficulties via participant and clinician reports. The screening protocol's sensitivity and specificity for detecting cognitive impairment, as defined by scores on a brief cognitive assessment, were evaluated.

Results: About half the sample had global cognitive impairment, whereas more than 90% demonstrated impairment in at least one cognitive domain. Screening items demonstrated high sensitivity to detect global (≥0.80) and specific cognitive impairment (≥0.74), such that individuals with objectively measured cognitive impairment were likely to be correctly identified, although specificity remained low (≤0.34).

Conclusions: The screening protocol may best be considered as a means to initiate shared decision making for next steps, which may include brief cognitive assessment or more resource-intensive evaluation, and to inform appropriate treatment recommendations.

认知健康筛查在协调专科护理中的敏感性和特异性
目的:认知健康应作为精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的常规临床护理的一部分,包括那些早期精神病患者。提供者需要一个有效的工作流程,包括具有足够敏感性和特异性的筛选工具,以促进适当的认知症状管理。这项研究旨在通过分析OnTrackNY(一个专门针对早期精神病患者的项目网络)102名参与者的数据,来检验认知健康筛查方案的效用。方法:筛选激发了参与者对更好的记忆力、注意力和批判性思维技能的有用性的感知,旨在通过参与者和临床医生的报告来检测认知困难的存在。筛选方案的敏感性和特异性检测认知障碍,定义为在一个简短的认知评估得分,进行评估。结果:大约一半的样本有整体认知障碍,而超过90%的人表现出至少一个认知领域的障碍。筛查项目在检测整体认知障碍(≥0.80)和特定认知障碍(≥0.74)方面具有较高的敏感性,因此客观测量的认知障碍个体可能被正确识别,尽管特异性仍然很低(≤0.34)。结论:筛查方案最好被视为启动下一步共同决策的一种手段,这可能包括简短的认知评估或更多的资源密集型评估,并告知适当的治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信