Healthcare utilization in a cohort receiving chronic disease specialty care by video telemedicine compared to propensity-matched adults not using telemedicine.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elizabeth D Ferucci, Rabecca I Arnold, Peter Holck
{"title":"Healthcare utilization in a cohort receiving chronic disease specialty care by video telemedicine compared to propensity-matched adults not using telemedicine.","authors":"Elizabeth D Ferucci, Rabecca I Arnold, Peter Holck","doi":"10.1177/1357633X251333514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionTelemedicine use has undergone rapid transformation in recent years. We designed this study to evaluate factors associated with telemedicine use and modality and the association with telemedicine use and healthcare utilization in a post-pandemic period.MethodsThis observational study included four regions of the Alaska Tribal Health System. We used electronic health record data to evaluate a cohort of adults who had chronic disease specialty care visits, with or without telemedicine, between July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 for factors associated with telemedicine use and modality. We then evaluated the association between telemedicine use and healthcare utilization in 2022. We used propensity score matching to improve covariate balance between adults who had used telemedicine or not, and then estimated the effect of telemedicine on outcomes (inpatient hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and emergency department visits) using multivariable models.ResultsAdults who used telemedicine were slightly older, had more chronic conditions and clinic visits, and resided in different regions compared to those who did not, with differences also observed between telemedicine modalities. The incident rate ratio for inpatient visits (1.16, p = 0.28), outpatient visits (1.15, p = 0.13), and emergency department visits (1.12, p = 0.36) were higher but not statistically significant for adults using telemedicine when compared to individuals not using telemedicine.DiscussionWe found a non-significant association of higher rates of inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits in people who used telemedicine compared to propensity-matched \"controls.\" These findings should be considered in context of potential benefits of telemedicine and patient preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X251333514"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X251333514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionTelemedicine use has undergone rapid transformation in recent years. We designed this study to evaluate factors associated with telemedicine use and modality and the association with telemedicine use and healthcare utilization in a post-pandemic period.MethodsThis observational study included four regions of the Alaska Tribal Health System. We used electronic health record data to evaluate a cohort of adults who had chronic disease specialty care visits, with or without telemedicine, between July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 for factors associated with telemedicine use and modality. We then evaluated the association between telemedicine use and healthcare utilization in 2022. We used propensity score matching to improve covariate balance between adults who had used telemedicine or not, and then estimated the effect of telemedicine on outcomes (inpatient hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and emergency department visits) using multivariable models.ResultsAdults who used telemedicine were slightly older, had more chronic conditions and clinic visits, and resided in different regions compared to those who did not, with differences also observed between telemedicine modalities. The incident rate ratio for inpatient visits (1.16, p = 0.28), outpatient visits (1.15, p = 0.13), and emergency department visits (1.12, p = 0.36) were higher but not statistically significant for adults using telemedicine when compared to individuals not using telemedicine.DiscussionWe found a non-significant association of higher rates of inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits in people who used telemedicine compared to propensity-matched "controls." These findings should be considered in context of potential benefits of telemedicine and patient preference.

通过视频远程医疗接受慢性病专科护理的队列中的医疗保健利用与不使用远程医疗的倾向匹配的成年人的比较
近年来,远程医疗的使用经历了快速的转变。我们设计这项研究是为了评估与远程医疗使用和模式相关的因素,以及大流行后时期远程医疗使用和医疗保健利用之间的关系。方法本观察性研究包括阿拉斯加部落卫生系统的四个地区。我们使用电子健康记录数据来评估2021年7月1日至2021年12月31日期间有或没有远程医疗的慢性病专科护理就诊的成年人队列,以了解与远程医疗使用和模式相关的因素。然后,我们评估了2022年远程医疗使用与医疗保健利用之间的关系。我们使用倾向得分匹配来改善使用或未使用远程医疗的成年人之间的协变量平衡,然后使用多变量模型估计远程医疗对结果(住院患者住院、门诊就诊和急诊就诊)的影响。结果使用远程医疗的成年人年龄稍大,患有慢性病和就诊次数较多,居住在不同地区,与未使用远程医疗的成年人相比,使用远程医疗的成年人也存在差异。使用远程医疗的成年人的住院就诊(1.16,p = 0.28)、门诊就诊(1.15,p = 0.13)和急诊科就诊(1.12,p = 0.36)的事发率比高于未使用远程医疗的成年人,但无统计学意义。讨论:我们发现,与倾向匹配的“对照组”相比,使用远程医疗的人的住院、门诊和急诊就诊率较高,但相关性不显著。这些发现应该在远程医疗的潜在益处和患者偏好的背景下加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信