Redefining value assessment and healthcare funding priorities for medicines: the journey to patient-centric decision making in APAC - a systematic literature review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Durhane Wong-Rieger, I-Ching Tsai, Jin Yu Tan, David Bin-Chia Wu, DaeYoung Yu, Alison Keetley, Alex Best, Ritu Jain
{"title":"Redefining value assessment and healthcare funding priorities for medicines: the journey to patient-centric decision making in APAC - a systematic literature review.","authors":"Durhane Wong-Rieger, I-Ching Tsai, Jin Yu Tan, David Bin-Chia Wu, DaeYoung Yu, Alison Keetley, Alex Best, Ritu Jain","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325000224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored patient involvement in healthcare decision-making in the Asia Pacific region (APAC) by identifying roles and factors influencing differences between healthcare systems. Proposed recommendations to enhance patient engagement were made.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic literature review was conducted using studies from Australia, China, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand. Studies were included if they provided data on patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) and/or funding decisions for medicines. Extracted data were scored according to eleven parameters adapted from the National Health Council (NHC) rubric, which assessed the level of patient involvement in healthcare system decision-making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 159 records between 2018 and 2022, including methodology guidelines from Government websites. Most mentioned parameters were patient partnership, patient-reported outcome, and mechanism to incorporate patient input. Limited information was available on diversity and patient-centered data sources. Tools for collecting patient experience included quality-of-life questionnaires, focus groups, interviews, and surveys, with feedback options like structured templates, videos, and public sessions.Beyond input in assessment process, involvement of patients in decision-making phase has evolved within HTA bodies over time with considerable variation. Few APAC healthcare systems involve patients in the appraisal process as members of the recommendation or decision-making committee.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that while patient involvement in pharmaceutical reimbursement decisions exists, improvements are needed. Effective integration of patient input requires transparency, education, and resource planning. This study establishes a baseline to track progress and assess the long-term impact of patient involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"41 1","pages":"e28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study explored patient involvement in healthcare decision-making in the Asia Pacific region (APAC) by identifying roles and factors influencing differences between healthcare systems. Proposed recommendations to enhance patient engagement were made.

Methods: This systematic literature review was conducted using studies from Australia, China, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand. Studies were included if they provided data on patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) and/or funding decisions for medicines. Extracted data were scored according to eleven parameters adapted from the National Health Council (NHC) rubric, which assessed the level of patient involvement in healthcare system decision-making.

Results: We identified 159 records between 2018 and 2022, including methodology guidelines from Government websites. Most mentioned parameters were patient partnership, patient-reported outcome, and mechanism to incorporate patient input. Limited information was available on diversity and patient-centered data sources. Tools for collecting patient experience included quality-of-life questionnaires, focus groups, interviews, and surveys, with feedback options like structured templates, videos, and public sessions.Beyond input in assessment process, involvement of patients in decision-making phase has evolved within HTA bodies over time with considerable variation. Few APAC healthcare systems involve patients in the appraisal process as members of the recommendation or decision-making committee.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that while patient involvement in pharmaceutical reimbursement decisions exists, improvements are needed. Effective integration of patient input requires transparency, education, and resource planning. This study establishes a baseline to track progress and assess the long-term impact of patient involvement.

重新定义药物的价值评估和医疗资助优先事项:亚太地区以患者为中心的决策之旅-系统文献综述。
目的:本研究通过识别影响医疗系统差异的角色和因素,探讨亚太地区(APAC)患者对医疗决策的参与。提出了提高患者参与度的建议。方法:本系统文献综述采用来自澳大利亚、中国、日本、马来西亚、新西兰、菲律宾、韩国、新加坡、台湾和泰国的研究。如果研究提供了患者参与卫生技术评估(HTA)和/或药物资助决策的数据,则纳入研究。提取的数据根据国家卫生委员会(NHC)标准的11个参数进行评分,该标准评估了患者参与医疗系统决策的水平。结果:我们确定了2018年至2022年期间的159份记录,包括政府网站的方法指南。提到最多的参数是患者伙伴关系、患者报告的结果和纳入患者输入的机制。关于多样性和以患者为中心的数据源的信息有限。收集患者体验的工具包括生活质量调查问卷、焦点小组、访谈和调查,以及结构化模板、视频和公开会议等反馈选项。除了在评估过程中的投入,患者在决策阶段的参与在HTA机构内随着时间的推移而发生了相当大的变化。亚太地区很少有医疗保健系统让患者作为建议或决策委员会的成员参与评估过程。结论:研究结果表明,虽然患者参与药物报销决策存在,但仍需改进。有效整合患者输入需要透明度、教育和资源规划。本研究建立了一个基线来跟踪进展和评估患者参与的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信